Literature DB >> 33284527

Evolution of the home health care market: The expansion and quality performance of multi-agency chains.

Fangli Geng1, Sarah Mansouri2, David G Stevenson3,4, David C Grabowski5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the growth and evolution of the home health agency (HHA) market and to compare quality performance across HHA ownership categories. DATA SOURCE: Agency characteristics were extracted from Medicare cost reports and Provider of Services file. Quality of care and patient characteristics were extracted from Quality of Patient Care Star Ratings and HHA Public Use File. STUDY
DESIGN: Agency- and state-level analyses were conducted to describe HHA market trends. Patient characteristics and quality measures were compared across ownership categories of interest. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: All Medicare-certified HHAs in operation, 2005-2018. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Over the study period, the HHA sector grew substantially, increasing from 7899 to 10 818 agencies, and chain-owned HHAs doubled in number from 903 (11.4% of all agencies) to 1841 (17.0%). In 2018, across agency types, for-profit nonchain agencies were the largest category both in the number of agencies (67.8%) and the number of Medicare enrollees served (40.7%). Additionally, for-profit nonchain agencies grew most in total number, from 4293 (54.3%) to 7337 (67.8%), while for-profit chain agencies grew most in the number of Medicare enrollees served, from 439 998 (12.9%) to 1 082 385 (28.3%). Regarding patient composition, for-profit nonchain agencies served the highest proportion of dual eligible beneficiaries (42.2%) and African-Americans (27.9%) among all agency types. Regarding quality performance, a higher star rating is significantly (P < .01) associated with chain agency status. Moreover, chain HHAs performed better on self-reported process measures, and risk-adjusted self-reported outcome measures; however, they performed worse on risk-adjusted claims-based outcome measures. These results were similar across for-profit and nonprofit chain agencies.
CONCLUSION: Chains play a growing role in the home health sector. Substantial differences in geographic distribution, patient composition, and quality performance were observed between chain- and nonchain HHAs. Examining the growth and performance of multi-agency chains can help inform quality reporting and monitoring, assess payment adequacy, and facilitate greater transparency and accountability within the HHA marketplace. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chain ownership; home health care; quality performance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284527      PMCID: PMC7720704          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  13 in total

1.  Utilization of home health services before and after the Balanced Budget Act of 1997: what were the initial effects?

Authors:  Nelda McCall; Andrew Petersons; Stanley Moore; Jodi Korb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of home health and hospice care agencies by organizational characteristics and services provided: United States, 2007.

Authors:  Eunice Y Park-Lee; Frederic H Decker
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2010-11-09

3.  Ownership conversions and nursing home performance.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; David G Stevenson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  The past, present, and future of skilled home health agency care.

Authors:  Rachel L Murkofsky; Karen Alston
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.076

5.  Private equity investment and nursing home care: is it a big deal?

Authors:  David G Stevenson; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Nearly half of all Medicare hospice enrollees received care from agencies owned by regional or national chains.

Authors:  David G Stevenson; Jesse B Dalton; David C Grabowski; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  For-profit medicare home health agencies' costs appear higher and quality appears lower compared to nonprofit agencies.

Authors:  William Cabin; David U Himmelstein; Michael L Siman; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Do corporate chains affect quality of care in nursing homes? The role of corporate standardization.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Whitney Berta; Joel A C Baum; Carmen Weigelt; Will Mitchell
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

9.  Uncovering waste in US healthcare: Evidence from ambulance referral patterns.

Authors:  Joseph J Doyle; John A Graves; Jonathan Gruber
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Effect of Ownership on Hospice Service Use: 2005-2011.

Authors:  David G Stevenson; David C Grabowski; Nancy L Keating; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Internet of Medical Things for Home-Based Treatment of Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Jerry Zhou; Vincent Ho; Bahman Javadi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.