Literature DB >> 33284525

The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.

M Susan Ridgely1, Christine Buttorff2, Laura J Wolf3, Erin Lindsey Duffy1,4, Ashlyn K Tom1, Cheryl L Damberg1, Dennis P Scanlon3, Mary E Vaiana1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We explore if there are ways to characterize health systems-not already revealed by secondary data-that could provide new insights into differences in health system performance. We sought to collect rich qualitative data to reveal whether and to what extent health systems vary in important ways across dimensions of structural, functional, and clinical integration. DATA SOURCES: Interviews with 162 c-suite executives of 24 health systems in four states conducted through "virtual" site visits between 2017 and 2019. STUDY
DESIGN: Exploratory study using thematic comparative analysis to describe factors that may lead to high performance. DATA COLLECTION: We used maximum variation sampling to achieve diversity in size and performance. We conducted, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in-depth, semi-structured interviews with system executives, covering such topics as market context, health system origin, organizational structure, governance features, and relationship of health system to affiliated hospitals and POs. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Health systems vary widely in size and ownership type, complexity of organization and governance arrangements, and ability to take on risk. Structural, functional, and clinical integration vary across systems, with considerable activity around centralizing business functions, aligning financial incentives with physicians, establishing enterprise-wide EHR, and moving toward single signatory contracting. Executives describe clinical integration as more difficult to achieve, but essential. Studies that treat "health system" as a binary variable may be inappropriately aggregating for analysis health systems of very different types, at different degrees of maturity, and at different stages of structural, functional, and clinical integration. As a result, a "signal" indicating performance may be distorted by the "noise."
CONCLUSIONS: Developing ways to account for the complex structures of today's health systems can enhance future efforts to study systems as complex organizations, to assess their performance, and to better understand the effects of payment innovation, care redesign, and other reforms. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  health care organization; health services research; health system; hospital-physician affiliation; integrated delivery system; qualitative research; vertical integration

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284525      PMCID: PMC7720708          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Themed issue: Accountable care organizations and vertical integration.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2019 Apr/Jun

3.  Medical Group Characteristics and the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Patricia Ramsay; Laurence C Baker; Michael F Pesko; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Hospital consolidation, competition, and quality: is bigger necessarily better?

Authors:  Thomas C Tsai; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  What Are the Determinants of Health System Performance? Findings from the Literature and a Technical Expert Panel.

Authors:  M Susan Ridgely; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Ashlyn Tom; Mary E Vaiana; Aneesa Motala; Marissa Silverman; Alice Kim; Cheryl L Damberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2019-12-16

6.  A Comprehensive Theory of Integration.

Authors:  Sara J Singer; Michaela Kerrissey; Mark Friedberg; Russell Phillips
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel M Machta; Kristin A Maurer; David J Jones; Michael F Furukawa; Eugene C Rich
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2019 Apr/Jun

8.  Medical Group Structural Integration May Not Ensure That Care Is Integrated, From The Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Michaela J Kerrissey; Jonathan R Clark; Mark W Friedberg; Wei Jiang; Ashley K Fryer; Molly Frean; Stephen M Shortell; Patricia P Ramsay; Lawrence P Casalino; Sara J Singer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Leveraging Diverse Data Sources to Identify and Describe U.S. Health Care Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Genna R Cohen; David J Jones; Jessica Heeringa; Kirsten Barrett; Michael F Furukawa; Dan Miller; Anne Mutti; James D Reschovsky; Rachel Machta; Stephen M Shortell; Taressa Fraze; Eugene Rich
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-12-15

10.  Weighing the Effects of Vertical Integration Versus Market Concentration on Hospital Quality.

Authors:  Marah Noel Short; Vivian Ho
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.929

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is Bigger Better?: A Closer Look at Small Health Systems in the United States.

Authors:  Tisamarie B Sherry; Cheryl L Damberg; Maria DeYoreo; Andy Bogart; Denis Agniel; M Susan Ridgely; José J Escarce
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.178

2.  Physician Compensation Arrangements and Financial Performance Incentives in US Health Systems.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Ashlyn K Tom; Rachel M Ross; Erin L Duffy; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  Evaluation of the integration of social accountability values into medical education using a problem-based learning curriculum.

Authors:  Nihar Ranjan Dash; Mohamed H Taha; Sarra Shorbagi; Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.