Literature DB >> 33284521

Care integration within and outside health system boundaries.

Sara J Singer1, Anna D Sinaiko2, Maike V Tietschert1,3, Michaela Kerrissey2, Russell S Phillips4, Veronique Martin1, Grace Joseph1, Hassina Bahadurzada1, Denis Agniel5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine care integration-efforts to unify disparate parts of health care organizations to generate synergy across activities occurring within and between them-to understand whether and at which organizational level health systems impact care quality and staff experience. DATA SOURCES: Surveys administered to one practice manager (56/59) and up to 26 staff (828/1360) in 59 practice sites within 24 physician organizations within 17 health systems in four states (2017-2019). STUDY
DESIGN: We developed manager and staff surveys to collect data on organizational, social, and clinical process integration, at four organizational levels: practice site, physician organization, health system, and outside health systems. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and regression. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Managers and staff perceived opportunity for improvement across most types of care integration and organizational levels. Managers/staff perceived little variation in care integration across health systems. They perceived better care integration within practice sites than within physician organizations, health systems, and outside health systems-up to 38 percentage points (pp) lower (P < .001) outside health systems compared to within practice sites. Of nine clinical process integration measures, one standard deviation (SD) (7.2-pp) increase in use of evidence-based care related to 6.4-pp and 8.9-pp increases in perceived quality of care by practice sites and health systems, respectively, and a 4.5-pp increase in staff job satisfaction; one SD (9.7-pp) increase in integration of social services and community resources related to a 7.0-pp increase in perceived quality of care by health systems; one SD (6.9-pp) increase in patient engagement related to a 6.4-pp increase in job satisfaction and a 4.6-pp decrease in burnout; and one SD (10.6-pp) increase in integration of diabetic eye examinations related to a 5.5-pp increase in job satisfaction (all P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Measures of clinical process integration related to higher staff ratings of quality and experience. Action is needed to improve care integration within and outside health systems. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care organizations and systems; integrated delivery systems; quality of care/patient safety (measurement); survey research and questionnaire design

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284521      PMCID: PMC7720712          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  31 in total

1.  Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.

Authors:  Iris Eekhout; Henrica C W de Vet; Jos W R Twisk; Jaap P L Brand; Michiel R de Boer; Martijn W Heymans
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Development and validation of the primary care team dynamics survey.

Authors:  Hummy Song; Alyna T Chien; Josephine Fisher; Julia Martin; Antoinette S Peters; Karen Hacker; Meredith B Rosenthal; Sara J Singer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Measuring Workplace Climate in Community Clinics and Health Centers.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Hector P Rodriguez; Grant R Martsolf; Maria O Edelen; Arturo Vargas Bustamante
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Vertical Integration of Hospitals and Physicians: Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence on Spending and Quality.

Authors:  Brady Post; Tom Buchmueller; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Adverse Events and Burnout: The Moderating Effects of Workgroup Identification and Safety Climate.

Authors:  Timothy J Vogus; Rangaraj Ramanujam; Zhanna Novikov; Vijaya Venkataramani; Subrahmaniam Tangirala
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Financial Integration's Impact On Care Delivery And Payment Reforms: A Survey Of Hospitals And Physician Practices.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Stephen M Shortell; A James O'Malley; Taressa K Fraze; Andrew Wood; Marisha Palm; Carrie H Colla; Meredith B Rosenthal; Hector P Rodriguez; Valerie A Lewis; Steven Woloshin; Nilay Shah; Ellen Meara
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Primary care physicians' links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Ann S O'Malley; Peter B Bach; Cynthia Saiontz-Martinez; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A Mixed Methods Study of the Association of Non-Veterans Affairs Care With Veterans' and Clinicians' Experiences of Care Coordination.

Authors:  Justin K Benzer; Deborah Gurewich; Sara J Singer; Nathalie M McIntosh; David C Mohr; Varsha G Vimalananda; Martin P Charns
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.

Authors:  Leeann N Comfort; Stephen M Shortell; Hector P Rodriguez; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: the perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries.

Authors:  M Bonciani; W Schäfer; S Barsanti; S Heinemann; P P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  United, can we be stronger? Did French general practitioners in multi-professional groups provide more chronic care follow-up during lockdown?

Authors:  Anna Zaytseva; Pierre Verger; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.