Literature DB >> 33284401

Long-term survival of two patients with pancreatic cancer after resection of liver and lung oligometastases: a case report.

Kei Hagiwara1, Norifumi Harimoto2,3, Kenichiro Araki1, Akira Watanabe1, Norio Kubo1, Seshiru Nakazawa4, Toshiki Yajima4, Nobuyuki Uchida5, Ken Shirabe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of resection of pancreatic cancer metastases has not been established. We here report two patients with long-term survival after resection of lung and liver metastases. CASE
PRESENTATION: The first patient underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. One year later, she underwent partial hepatectomy for a single liver metastasis. She subsequently underwent pulmonary resections 7, 7.5, 9, and 10 years later for pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer. Thus, this patient underwent five surgeries for metastases, one for a liver metastasis and four for lung metastases. All of the tumors were pathologically diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer. She is currently alive without new recurrence 10 years after the initial diagnosis. The second patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Four years later, she underwent a thoracoscopic partial resection for lung metastasis. The tumor was similar to the pancreatic cancer on pathological examination. She is currently alive without new recurrences 6 years after the initial diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients with pancreatic cancer by resection of metachronous liver or lung metastases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metastatic liver tumor; Metastatic lung tumor; Oligometastases; Pancreatic cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284401      PMCID: PMC7721952          DOI: 10.1186/s40792-020-01029-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2198-7793


Background

The term oligometastasis was introduced in 1995 and refers to a state of limited systemic metastases [1]. There is no precise definition of this term; however, most studies define oligometastases as the presence of up to three, or up to five, metastases [2]. Theoretically, local ablative therapy may be curative in some patients with oligometastasis [3]. Long-term survival after excision of metastases has been reported for some types of cancer. Resection of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer can improve prognosis [4]. Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer has reportedly achieved good long-term cancer-specific survival benefit [5], repeat hepatic resection for colorectal cancer being as effective as primary surgical treatment [6]. However, pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, being characterized by rapid progression, high metastatic potential, and limited response to conventional therapies [7]. Despite progress in the development of multidisciplinary treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with pancreatic cancer is less than 10% [8]. The efficacy of resection of metastatic pancreatic cancer has not been established; however, there is increasing interest in the possibility that metastasectomy in well-selected patients can prolong survival [9]. We here report two patients with pancreatic cancer with long-term survival after resection of liver and lung metastases.

Case presentation

Case 1: A 57-year-old woman was admitted with cancer of the pancreatic body. Computed tomography (CT) showed a 3.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic body and no evidence of intrahepatic, distant, or lymph node metastasis (Fig. 1a). This clinical course is summarized in Fig. 2a.
Fig. 1

a CT image showing a 3.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic body. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis are arranged as tubular structures (hematoxylin and eosin [HE] staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a mass suggestive of metastasis in the liver (S5). d Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis that are similar to those of the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. e CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S2). F. Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. g CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S9). h Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. i. CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). j Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. k CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S6). l Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200

Fig. 2

a Summary of the course of the case 1. b Summary of the course of the case 2

a CT image showing a 3.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic body. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis are arranged as tubular structures (hematoxylin and eosin [HE] staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a mass suggestive of metastasis in the liver (S5). d Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis that are similar to those of the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. e CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S2). F. Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. g CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S9). h Photomicrograph showing the tumor is similar to the original pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. i. CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). j Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. k CT image showing a nodule in the left lung (S6). l Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200 a Summary of the course of the case 1. b Summary of the course of the case 2 She underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, and lymph node dissection. On microscopic examination of the operative specimen, cancer cells with abundant fibrosis were arranged in tubular structures (Fig. 1b). There was microscopic evidence of invasion of the nerve plexus; however, no vascular invasion was identified and the resection margin was negative. The histopathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0 Stage IIA: UICC). One year after resection of the primary tumor, a mass suggestive of liver metastasis was identified (S5) (Fig. 1c). No distant metastases were detected. She underwent a partial hepatectomy for liver metastasis. On microscopic examination, the cancer had abundant fibrosis and was similar to the original pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1d). The tumor was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer. She was followed up with no recurrence for the next 5 years. However, 7 years after the primary resection, CT showed a 1-cm nodule in the right lung (S2) (Fig. 1e) that was diagnosed as a lung metastasis from pancreatic cancer. The single tumor appeared to be resectable so thoracoscopic resection of the right upper lobe was performed. The tumor was similar to the original pancreatic cancer on microscopic examination and was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1f). Seven years and 6 months after the primary resection, she underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of a nodule in the left lung (S9) (Fig. 1g). This tumor was also diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1g). Nine years after the primary resection, she underwent partial resection of the right lobe (Fig. 1i) for another tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1j). Ten years after the primary resection, she underwent thoracoscopic resection of the left lower lobe (Fig. 1k) for another tumor that was also diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1l). She has since been followed up with no evidence of recurrence and remains alive without new recurrence 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Thus, she underwent five surgeries, one for liver metastasis and four for lung metastases after the primary resection. Changes in the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) before and after surgical resections are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of CA19-9 had increased slightly before hepatectomy for metastatic liver cancer; however, the concentrations of these tumor markers were within their normal ranges at the times of the remaining measurements.
Table 1

Summary of changes in tumor markers concentrations

PreoperativePostoperative
CEA (ng/mL)(0–5.0)CA19-9 (U/mL)(0–37)CEA (ng/mL)(0–5.0)CA19-9 (U/mL)(0–37)
Case 1
 Primary resection1.7141.312
 Liver metastasis resection1.5611.512
 First lung metastasis resection2.920
 Second lung metastasis resection2.7
 Third lung metastasis resection3.0
 Fourth lung metastasis resection3.018
Case 2
 Primary resection2.21042.624
 Lung metastasis resection5.7475.553
Summary of changes in tumor markers concentrations Gemcitabine (GEM) had been administered intravenously for 6 months after the primary resection as adjuvant chemotherapy, this having been the standard regimen at that time. However, she had experienced severe adverse effects, namely nausea and general malaise. Although adjuvant chemotherapy using GEM for 6 months after resection of the liver metastasis had been planned, she only received this chemotherapy for 2 months because of its severe adverse effects. After every pulmonary resection, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for 6 months was proposed, but she consistently refused it. Case 2: A 73-year-old woman was admitted with cancer of the pancreatic head. CT showed a 2.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head and no evidence of intrahepatic, distant, or lymph node metastasis (Fig. 3a). This clinical course is summarized in Fig. 2a.
Fig. 3

a CT image showing a 2.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis arranged in tubular structures (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). d Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200

a CT image showing a 2.0 cm hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic head. b Photomicrograph showing cancer cells with abundant fibrosis arranged in tubular structures (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200. c CT image showing a nodule in the right lung (S6). d Photomicrograph showing a tumor that was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (HE staining). Original magnification: ×200 She underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and lymph node dissection. Microscopic examination of the operative specimen showed cancer cells with abundant fibrosis arranged in tubular structures (Fig. 3b). Cancer cells were invading the nerve plexus and lymph vessels; however, no vascular invasion was identified and the resection margin was negative. One lymph node metastasis was detected. The histopathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (pT3N1M0 Stage IIB: UICC). Four years after the primary resection, CT showed a nodule in the right lung (S6) (Fig. 3c). We performed a thoracoscopic partial resection of the right lobe. The tumor was found to be similar to the pancreatic cancer on microscopic examination and was diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic cancer (Fig. 3d). She has been followed up with no recurrence and remains alive without new recurrence 6 years after the initial diagnosis. Changes in the tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 before and after surgical resections are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of CA19-9 had increased slightly before primary resection of the pancreas, and had fallen to within the normal range after resection. CA19-9 concentrations were slightly increased both before and after pulmonary resection. She underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year after the primary resection. Chemotherapy with S-1 for a further 6 months was proposed after resection of her lung metastasis; however, she refused this.

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal cancers, is characterized by rapid progression and limited response to conventional therapies [7]. Despite progress in the development of multidisciplinary treatments, the 5-year OS rate of patients with pancreatic cancer is less than 10% [8]. Metastatic or recurrent cancer is difficult to manage; in particular, surgery alone appears to be non-curative in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer [9]. The most effective treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection; however, in patients with simultaneous metastases at the time of diagnosis, the disease is unresectable according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [10]. In addition, resection is rarely indicated for metastases from pancreatic cancer. Isabella et al. reported administering systemic chemotherapy to 535 patients with oligometastasis from pancreatic cancer, only 24 (4.5%) of whom underwent successful resection [11]. However, resection of metachronous oligometastasis in well-selected patients with pancreatic cancer is reportedly effective [12]. The prognosis of pancreatic cancer reportedly improves when metachronous liver and lung metastases are resected, median overall survival after the first treatment varying from 51 to 121 months for lung metastases and from 24 to 40 months for liver metastases [13]. Isabella et al. reported a median OS of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing resection of oligometastases of 56 months (range 36–75) [14], whereas Wright et al. reported a median OS for such patients of 18.2 months (95% CI 11.8–35.5) [15]. Still, our patients who underwent surgical resection for metastases, who survived more than 120 months and 72 months after the initial diagnosis, are extremely rare. The characteristics of patients with long-term survival after resection of oligometastasis have not been fully clarified. In a study in which patients underwent pulmonary resection for suspected metastasis after resection of a primary pancreatic cancer, those with late recurrence (later than 17 months after primary surgery) had better OS than those with earlier development of pulmonary nodules (32.2 vs. 14.75 months, p = 0.025). High serum concentrations of tumor markers (CA 19-9 and CEA) and number of pulmonary metastases reportedly have no significant impact on outcome [16]. Lu et al. reported that resection of solitary hepatic or pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer should be considered only when: (I) complete surgical resection (R0) can be achieved by pancreatectomy; (II) the pancreatic cancer has responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; (III) the oligometastases are resectable; and (IV) the patient is in overall good general health with few comorbidities [17]. Both of our patients met conditions (I), (III) and (IV); however, neither of them received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The reasons for our failure to prescribe this treatment were as follows: (1) the concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy had not been clarified at the time in question; (2) there were few recommended chemotherapeutic regimens at that time; and (3) both patients refused chemotherapy because they had experienced severe adverse effects while receiving previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Nowadays, the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer has greatly improved with the advent of effective chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and GEM/nab-paclitaxel [18]. These treatments have been reported to have tumor-reducing effects [19, 20]. A recent study suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be important in determining surgical indications for oligometastasis, especially when it has occurred soon after resection of the primary lesion [11, 16, 17]. Thus, if a single liver metastasis occurs within 1 year of primary resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy using effective chemotherapeutic regimens is currently considered for that metastasis. Additionally, more oligometastases may become resectable as a result of administering these treatments. Nevertheless, some patients who undergo surgical resection of oligometastasis experience long subsequent survivals without chemotherapy. Further investigation is necessary to determine the utility of neo and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for oligometastasis. Systematic follow-up of patients who undergo surgical resection of oligometastasis is very important. Although one study has reported that up to 80% of patients who have undergone resection of oligometastases of pancreatic cancer develop recurrence within 2 years [12], there is no standard recommendation as to when follow-up can be stopped. The present cases indicate that late recurrence can occur and life-long follow-up may be necessary. When treating metastases from pancreatic cancer, it is necessary to consider the site, number of metastases, general condition of the patient and the necessity of chemotherapy to determine whether resection is indicated.

Conclusions

We here present two patients with pancreatic cancer who achieved long-term survival by repeated resection of metastatic lesions. Resection of metachronous liver or lung metastases can result in long-term survival of some patients with pancreatic cancer.
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuhito Muranaka; Masaki Kuwatani; Yoshito Komatsu; Kentaro Sawada; Hiroshi Nakatsumi; Yasuyuki Kawamoto; Satoshi Yuki; Yoshimasa Kubota; Kimitoshi Kubo; Shuhei Kawahata; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hiroshi Kawakami; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

2.  Long-term outcome and quality of life after initial and repeat resection of colorectal liver metastasis: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  D Heise; W Bayings; A Tuinhof; R Eickhoff; A Kroh; F Ulmer; C H C Dejong; U Neumann; M Binnebösel
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; Mokenge P Malafa; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; Horacio Asbun; Andrew Bain; Stephen W Behrman; Al B Benson; Ellen Binder; Dana B Cardin; Charles Cha; E Gabriela Chiorean; Vincent Chung; Brian Czito; Mary Dillhoff; Efrat Dotan; Cristina R Ferrone; Jeffrey Hardacre; William G Hawkins; Joseph Herman; Andrew H Ko; Srinadh Komanduri; Albert Koong; Noelle LoConte; Andrew M Lowy; Cassadie Moravek; Eric K Nakakura; Eileen M O'Reilly; Jorge Obando; Sushanth Reddy; Courtney Scaife; Sarah Thayer; Colin D Weekes; Robert A Wolff; Brian M Wolpin; Jennifer Burns; Susan Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A review of current literature.

Authors:  Tatsuma Sakaguchi; Roberto Valente; Kimitaka Tanaka; Sohei Satoi; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Oligometastases.

Authors:  S Hellman; R R Weichselbaum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  C Sperti; C Pasquali; A Piccoli; S Pedrazzoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Downstaging in Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer: A New Population Eligible for Surgery?

Authors:  Isabella Frigerio; Paolo Regi; Alessandro Giardino; Filippo Scopelliti; Roberto Girelli; Claudio Bassi; Stefano Gobbo; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Paola Capelli; Mirko D'Onofrio; Giuseppe Malleo; Laura Maggino; Elena Viviani; Giovanni Butturini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients.

Authors:  Myrddin Rees; Paris P Tekkis; Fenella K S Welsh; Thomas O'Rourke; Timothy G John
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Surgery for oligometastasis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Fengchun Lu; Katherine E Poruk; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  An individual patient data metaanalysis of outcomes and prognostic factors after treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Allison B Ashworth; Suresh Senan; David A Palma; Marc Riquet; Yong Chan Ahn; Umberto Ricardi; Maria T Congedo; Daniel R Gomez; Gavin M Wright; Giulio Melloni; Michael T Milano; Claudio V Sole; Tommaso M De Pas; Dennis L Carter; Andrew J Warner; George B Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of high-quality nursing care on quality of life, survival, and recurrence in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Minghuan Wang; Yang Sun; Meihui Zhang; Renzhi Yu; Jing Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.