Literature DB >> 33284126

Effectiveness of a Mobile-Based Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance System (FluMob) Among Health Care Workers: Longitudinal Study.

May Oo Lwin1, Jiahui Lu2, Anita Sheldenkar1, Chitra Panchapakesan1, Yi-Roe Tan3, Peiling Yap4, Mark I Chen3, Vincent Tk Chow5, Koh Cheng Thoon6, Chee Fu Yung6, Li Wei Ang3, Brenda Sp Ang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing studies have suggested that internet-based participatory surveillance systems are a valid sentinel for influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance. However, there is limited scientific knowledge on the effectiveness of mobile-based ILI surveillance systems. Previous studies also adopted a passive surveillance approach and have not fully investigated the effectiveness of the systems and their determinants.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of a mobile-based surveillance system of ILI, termed FluMob, among health care workers using a targeted surveillance approach. Specifically, this study evaluated the effectiveness of the system for ILI surveillance pertaining to its participation engagement and surveillance power. In addition, we aimed to identify the factors that can moderate the effectiveness of the system.
METHODS: The FluMob system was launched in two large hospitals in Singapore from April 2016 to March 2018. A total of 690 clinical and nonclinical hospital staff participated in the study for 18 months and were prompted via app notifications to submit a survey listing 18 acute respiratory symptoms (eg, fever, cough, sore throat) on a weekly basis. There was a period of study disruption due to maintenance of the system and the end of the participation incentive between May and July of 2017.
RESULTS: On average, the individual submission rate was 41.4% (SD 24.3%), with a rate of 51.8% (SD 26.4%) before the study disruption and of 21.5% (SD 30.6%) after the disruption. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the adjusted individual submission rates were higher for participants who were older (<30 years, 31.4% vs 31-40 years, 40.2% [P<.001]; 41-50 years, 46.0% [P<.001]; >50 years, 39.9% [P=.01]), ethnic Chinese (Chinese, 44.4% vs non-Chinese, 34.7%; P<.001), and vaccinated against flu in the past year (vaccinated, 44.6% vs nonvaccinated, 34.4%; P<.001). In addition, the weekly ILI incidence was 1.07% on average. The Pearson correlation coefficient between ILI incidence estimated by FluMob and that reported by Singapore Ministry of Health was 0.04 (P=.75) with all data and was 0.38 (P=.006) including only data collected before the study disruption. Health care workers with higher risks of ILI and influenza such as women, non-Chinese, allied health staff, those who had children in their households, not vaccinated against influenza, and reported allergy demonstrated higher surveillance correlations.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobile-based ILI surveillance systems among health care workers can be effective. However, proper operation of the mobile system without major disruptions is vital for the engagement of participants and the persistence of surveillance power. Moreover, the effectiveness of the mobile surveillance system can be moderated by participants' characteristics, which highlights the importance of targeted disease surveillance that can reduce the cost of recruitment and engagement. ©May Oo Lwin, Jiahui Lu, Anita Sheldenkar, Chitra Panchapakesan, Yi-Roe Tan, Peiling Yap, Mark I Chen, Vincent TK Chow, Koh Cheng Thoon, Chee Fu Yung, Li Wei Ang, Brenda SP Ang. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 07.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care workers; influenza-like illness; mobile phone; participatory surveillance; syndromic surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284126      PMCID: PMC7752531          DOI: 10.2196/19712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  30 in total

1.  Influenza and seasonal patterns of hospital use by older adults in long-term care and community settings in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Andrea Gruneir; Jeff C Kwong; Michael A Campitelli; Alice Newman; Geoffrey M Anderson; Paula A Rochon; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  E-health technologies show promise in developing countries.

Authors:  Joaquin A Blaya; Hamish S F Fraser; Brian Holt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Influenza in Singapore: assessing the burden of illness in the community.

Authors:  T P Ng; K H Pwee; M Niti; L G Goh
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.473

4.  Economic analysis of pandemic influenza vaccination strategies in Singapore.

Authors:  Vernon J Lee; Mei Yin Tok; Vincent T Chow; Kai Hong Phua; Eng Eong Ooi; Paul A Tambyah; Mark I Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Surveillance and clinical characterization of influenza in a university cohort in Singapore.

Authors:  Aidan Lyanzhiang Tan; Ramandeep Kaur Virk; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah; Masafumi Inoue; Elizabeth Ai-Sim Lim; Ka-Wei Chan; C Senthamarai Chelvi; Say-Tat Ooi; Catherine Chua; Boon-Huan Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Determinants of follow-up participation in the Internet-based European influenza surveillance platform Influenzanet.

Authors:  Paolo Bajardi; Alessandro Vespignani; Sebastian Funk; Ken Td Eames; W John Edmunds; Clément Turbelin; Marion Debin; Vittoria Colizza; Ronald Smallenburg; Carl E Koppeschaar; Ana O Franco; Vitor Faustino; Annasara Carnahan; Moa Rehn; Daniela Paolotti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Building influenza surveillance pyramids in near real time, Australia.

Authors:  Craig B Dalton; Sandra J Carlson; Michelle T Butler; Elissa Elvidge; David N Durrheim
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  FluMob: Enabling Surveillance of Acute Respiratory Infections in Health-care Workers via Mobile Phones.

Authors:  May Oo Lwin; Chee Fu Yung; Peiling Yap; Karthikayen Jayasundar; Anita Sheldenkar; Kosala Subasinghe; Schubert Foo; Udeepa Gayantha Jayasinghe; Huarong Xu; Siaw Ching Chai; Ashwin Kurlye; Jie Chen; Brenda Sze Peng Ang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-03-17

9.  Influenza seasonality and vaccination timing in tropical and subtropical areas of southern and south-eastern Asia.

Authors:  Siddhartha Saha; Mandeep Chadha; Abdullah Al Mamun; Mahmudur Rahman; Katharine Sturm-Ramirez; Malinee Chittaganpitch; Sirima Pattamadilok; Sonja J Olsen; Ondri Dwi Sampurno; Vivi Setiawaty; Krisna Nur Andriana Pangesti; Gina Samaan; Sibounhom Archkhawongs; Phengta Vongphrachanh; Darouny Phonekeo; Andrew Corwin; Sok Touch; Philippe Buchy; Nora Chea; Paul Kitsutani; Le Quynh Mai; Vu Dinh Thiem; Raymond Lin; Constance Low; Chong Chee Kheong; Norizah Ismail; Mohd Apandi Yusof; Amado Tandoc; Vito Roque; Akhilesh Mishra; Ann C Moen; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Jeffrey Partridge; Renu B Lal
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Ethnic and gender specific life expectancies of the Singapore population, 1965 to 2009 - converging, or diverging?

Authors:  Raymond Boon Tar Lim; Huili Zheng; Qian Yang; Alex Richard Cook; Kee Seng Chia; Wei Yen Lim
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Influenza surveillance systems using traditional and alternative sources of data: A scoping review.

Authors:  Aspen Hammond; John J Kim; Holly Sadler; Katelijn Vandemaele
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  The Landscape of Participatory Surveillance Systems Across the One Health Spectrum: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carrie McNeil; Sarah Verlander; Nomita Divi; Mark Smolinski
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-08-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.