Justin C Collette1,2,3, Mark K J Ooi1,3. 1. Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. The Australian PlantBank, Australian Institute of Botanical Science, Australian Botanic Garden, Mount Annan NSW, Australia. 3. NSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Different seed dormancy classes control the timing of germination via different cues. The ecological dissimilarities between classes therefore suggest that they are likely to be subject to different selective pressures, and that species within each class will have diverse functional responses. We aimed to investigate this by assessing how variation in the distribution of dormancy classes is correlated with regional environmental factors, in particular rainfall seasonality and temperature. Additionally, we compare the relative proportions of species with physiological (PD) or physical (PY) dormancy to assess whether dormancy class influences their ability to persist under different rainfall seasonality regimes. METHODS: Dormancy class was assigned for 3990 species from 281 genera occurring across two climate regions, with either winter or aseasonal rainfall, across temperate fire-prone Australia. All regions have similar vegetation and fire regimes. Using a Bayesian framework, we compared the distribution of dormancy classes across temperature and rainfall climate gradients, for threatened and common species. KEY RESULTS: A high dormant:non-dormant species ratio highlighted the critical role of dormancy across our study regions. Critically, species showing PD were more likely to be threatened in aseasonal rainfall climate regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the assumption that dormancy is favoured in environments with stochastic disturbance.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Different seed dormancy classes control the timing of germination via different cues. The ecological dissimilarities between classes therefore suggest that they are likely to be subject to different selective pressures, and that species within each class will have diverse functional responses. We aimed to investigate this by assessing how variation in the distribution of dormancy classes is correlated with regional environmental factors, in particular rainfall seasonality and temperature. Additionally, we compare the relative proportions of species with physiological (PD) or physical (PY) dormancy to assess whether dormancy class influences their ability to persist under different rainfall seasonality regimes. METHODS: Dormancy class was assigned for 3990 species from 281 genera occurring across two climate regions, with either winter or aseasonal rainfall, across temperate fire-prone Australia. All regions have similar vegetation and fire regimes. Using a Bayesian framework, we compared the distribution of dormancy classes across temperature and rainfall climate gradients, for threatened and common species. KEY RESULTS: A high dormant:non-dormant species ratio highlighted the critical role of dormancy across our study regions. Critically, species showing PD were more likely to be threatened in aseasonal rainfall climate regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the assumption that dormancy is favoured in environments with stochastic disturbance.
Authors: Russell G Miller; Ryan Tangney; Neal J Enright; Joseph B Fontaine; David J Merritt; Mark K J Ooi; Katinka X Ruthrof; Ben P Miller Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Rafael Rubio de Casas; Charles G Willis; William D Pearse; Carol C Baskin; Jerry M Baskin; Jeannine Cavender-Bares Journal: New Phytol Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Arne Saatkamp; Anne Cochrane; Lucy Commander; Lydia K Guja; Borja Jimenez-Alfaro; Julie Larson; Adrienne Nicotra; Peter Poschlod; Fernando A O Silveira; Adam T Cross; Emma L Dalziell; John Dickie; Todd E Erickson; Alessandra Fidelis; Anne Fuchs; Peter J Golos; Michael Hope; Wolfgang Lewandrowski; David J Merritt; Ben P Miller; Russell G Miller; Catherine A Offord; Mark K J Ooi; Annisa Satyanti; Karen D Sommerville; Ryan Tangney; Sean Tomlinson; Shane Turner; Jeffrey L Walck Journal: New Phytol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Charles G Willis; Carol C Baskin; Jerry M Baskin; Josh R Auld; D Lawrence Venable; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Kathleen Donohue; Rafael Rubio de Casas Journal: New Phytol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Roberta L C Dayrell; Queila S Garcia; Daniel Negreiros; Carol C Baskin; Jerry M Baskin; Fernando A O Silveira Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Kristen Wagmann; Nina-Coralie Hautekèete; Yves Piquot; Cécile Meunier; S Eric Schmitt; Henk Van Dijk Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 4.357