Catarina Brito1,2,3, Luís Falcão4,3, Mário Raimundo4, Sara Fernandes4, Adriana Fernandes4, Sónia Silva4, Pedro Vilela1,5,6,7, Edgar de Almeida4. 1. Neuroradiology Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisbon, Portugal. 2. University College London, UK. 3. *These authors contributed equally to the study and final manuscript. 4. Nephrology Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisbon, Portugal. 5. Institutional Council of the European Society of Neuroradiology. 6. Portuguese Neuroradiology Society, Portugal. 7. Spanish Neuroradiology Society, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The potential nephrotoxicity of intravenous iodinated contrast media is a major concern for acute ischaemic stroke imaging evaluation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury after intravenous iodinated contrast media exposure in acute ischaemic stroke patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis between January 2012 and July 2018 to select adult patients admitted to the emergency department with acute ischaemic stroke. The exposed patients received a uniform intravenous dose of low osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media, as part of the imaging protocol for acute ischaemic stroke. The unexposed patients underwent a non-enhanced cranial computed tomography scan. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, limited to the first 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 161 and 105 patients were included in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively. The median age was 72.8 years (interquartile range 20), 53% were men and 97% were white. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The incidence of acute kidney injury between exposed (n = 10, 6.2%) and unexposed (n = 1, 1%) groups (P = 0.073) was similar and contrast exposure was not a significant predictor of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: Intravenous iodinated contrast media exposure during acute ischaemic stroke imaging protocols is not an independent predictor of acute kidney injury in patients with normal or near-normal renal function. Studies with larger sample sizes would help to clarify if patients with both cardiovascular risk factors and impaired renal function could benefit from prophylactic measures.
PURPOSE: The potential nephrotoxicity of intravenous iodinated contrast media is a major concern for acute ischaemic stroke imaging evaluation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury after intravenous iodinated contrast media exposure in acute ischaemic strokepatients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis between January 2012 and July 2018 to select adult patients admitted to the emergency department with acute ischaemic stroke. The exposed patients received a uniform intravenous dose of low osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media, as part of the imaging protocol for acute ischaemic stroke. The unexposed patients underwent a non-enhanced cranial computed tomography scan. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, limited to the first 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 161 and 105 patients were included in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively. The median age was 72.8 years (interquartile range 20), 53% were men and 97% were white. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The incidence of acute kidney injury between exposed (n = 10, 6.2%) and unexposed (n = 1, 1%) groups (P = 0.073) was similar and contrast exposure was not a significant predictor of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: Intravenous iodinated contrast media exposure during acute ischaemic stroke imaging protocols is not an independent predictor of acute kidney injury in patients with normal or near-normal renal function. Studies with larger sample sizes would help to clarify if patients with both cardiovascular risk factors and impaired renal function could benefit from prophylactic measures.