Literature DB >> 33283325

Subjective alcohol responses in high- and low-risk adolescents: results from the Dresden Longitudinal Study on Alcohol Use in Young Adults.

Jesus Chavarria1, Daniel J Fridberg2, Elisabeth Obst3, Ulrich S Zimmermann3,4, Andrea C King2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Research shows that sensitivity to certain alcohol responses conveys risk for problem drinking. This study aimed to determine if high-risk adolescent drinkers infuse more alcohol and experience greater alcohol-induced stimulation and wanting and less sedation than low-risk adolescent drinkers. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two low- (n = 38) and high-risk (n = 54) adolescent drinkers, as determined by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores of < 6 or ≥ 6, respectively, participated in the Dresden Longitudinal Study on Alcohol Use in Young Adults in which intravenous alcohol self-administration was examined in a mixed within- and between-subjects design.
SETTING: Technische Universität Dresden. Dresden, Germany. MEASUREMENTS: Predictors were drinking status (high- versus low-risk), time and their interactions. Outcomes were arterial blood alcohol concentration (aBAC); alcohol-induced stimulation, sedation and wanting assessed at baseline, 10 (alcohol prime), 45, 65, 85, 105, 125 and 145 minutes. Covariates were family history of alcohol use disorder, sex and aBAC.
RESULTS: The alcohol prime dose produced similar sharp increases in stimulation and sedation in high- and low-risk drinkers (time P < 0.001; group × time P > 0.05). During self-administration, high-risk drinkers reached higher aBACs (P = 0.028) at a faster rate (group × time P < 0.001), and experienced further increases in stimulation (group × time P = 0.005) but with similar sedation (group × time P = 0.794) than in low-risk drinkers. High-risk drinkers also exhibited greater tonic alcohol wanting (group P = 0.003) throughout the session.
CONCLUSIONS: High-risk adolescent drinkers appear to have heightened sensitivity to alcohol-induced stimulation and tonic high levels of wanting compared with low-risk adolescent drinkers.
© 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute alcohol effects; adolescent drinking; intravenous alcohol self-administration; sedation; stimulation; wanting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33283325      PMCID: PMC8729170          DOI: 10.1111/add.15368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   7.256


  50 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol dependence in the United States: results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.

Authors:  B F Grant
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1997-09

2.  Assessing the effectiveness of minimum legal drinking age and zero tolerance laws in the United States.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; A Scott Tippetts; James C Fell
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-07

3.  Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the timeline followback for individuals with alcohol problems.

Authors:  Linda Carter Sobell; Sangeeta Agrawal; Mark B Sobell; Gloria I Leo; Lisa Johnson Young; John A Cunningham; Edward R Simco
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2003-11

4.  Breath alcohol concentration determined with a new analyzer using free exhalation predicts almost precisely the arterial blood alcohol concentration.

Authors:  L Lindberg; S Brauer; P Wollmer; L Goldberg; A W Jones; S G Olsson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement.

Authors:  Joel Swendsen; Marcy Burstein; Brady Case; Kevin P Conway; Lisa Dierker; Jianping He; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04

6.  Reliability of a family tree questionnaire for assessing family history of alcohol problems.

Authors:  R E Mann; L C Sobell; M B Sobell; D Pavan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Deborah Hasin; Sean J O'Connor; Patrick J McNamara; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Patrick D Quinn; Kim Fromme
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Development and pilot validation of computer-assisted self-infusion of ethanol (CASE): a new method to study alcohol self-administration in humans.

Authors:  Ulrich S Zimmermann; Inge Mick; Victor Vitvitskyi; Martin H Plawecki; Karl F Mann; Sean O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 10.  Prevalence and predictors of adolescent alcohol use and binge drinking in the United States.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; John E Schulenberg
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2013
View more
  2 in total

1.  Acute alcohol rewarding effects as a risk factor for hangover frequency.

Authors:  Jesus Chavarria; Daniel J Fridberg; Andrea C King
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Rewarding Subjective Effects of the NMDAR Antagonist Nitrous Oxide (Laughing Gas) Are Moderated by Impulsivity and Depressive Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Sunjeev K Kamboj; Hannah Zhao; Luzia Troebinger; Giulia Piazza; Emma Cawley; Vanessa Hennessy; Georges Iskandar; Ravi K Das
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.176

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.