The ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has demonstrated the potential need for a low-cost, rapidly deployable ventilator. Based on this premise, we sought to design a ventilator with the following criteria: 1) standard components that are accessible to the public, 2) "open-source" compatibility to allow anyone to easily recreate the system, 3) ability to ventilate in acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 4) lowest possible cost to provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation. DESIGN: We pursued development of a pneumatic-type ventilator. The basic design involves three electrically controlled solenoid valves, a pressure chamber, the patient breathing circuit, a positive end-expiratory pressure valve, and an electronics control system. Multiple safety elements were built into the design. The user-friendly interface allows simple control of ventilator settings. The ventilator delivers a hybrid form of pneumatic, assist-control ventilation, with predicted tidal volumes of 300-800 mL, positive end-expiratory pressure 0-20 cm H2O, and Fio2 21-100%. MAIN RESULTS: The ventilator was extensively tested with two separate high-fidelity lung simulators and a porcine in vivo model. Both lung simulators were able to simulate a variety of pathologic states, including obstructive lung disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The ventilator performed well across all simulated scenarios. Similarly, a porcine in vivo model was used to assess performance in live tissue, with a specific emphasis on gas exchange. The ventilator performed well in vivo and demonstrated noninferior ventilation and oxygenation when compared with the standard ventilator. CONCLUSIONS: The Portsmouth Ventilator was able to perform well across all simulated pathologies and in vivo. All components may be acquired by the public for a cost of approximately $250 U.S.D. Although this ventilator has limited functionality compared with modern ventilators, the simple design appears to be safe and would allow for rapid mass production if ventilator surge demand exceeded supply.
The ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has demonstrated the potential need for a low-cost, rapidly deployable ventilator. Based on this premise, we sought to design a ventilator with the following criteria: 1) standard components that are accessible to the public, 2) "open-source" compatibility to allow anyone to easily recreate the system, 3) ability to ventilate in acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 4) lowest possible cost to provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation. DESIGN: We pursued development of a pneumatic-type ventilator. The basic design involves three electrically controlled solenoid valves, a pressure chamber, the patient breathing circuit, a positive end-expiratory pressure valve, and an electronics control system. Multiple safety elements were built into the design. The user-friendly interface allows simple control of ventilator settings. The ventilator delivers a hybrid form of pneumatic, assist-control ventilation, with predicted tidal volumes of 300-800 mL, positive end-expiratory pressure 0-20 cm H2O, and Fio2 21-100%. MAIN RESULTS: The ventilator was extensively tested with two separate high-fidelity lung simulators and a porcine in vivo model. Both lung simulators were able to simulate a variety of pathologic states, including obstructive lung disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The ventilator performed well across all simulated scenarios. Similarly, a porcine in vivo model was used to assess performance in live tissue, with a specific emphasis on gas exchange. The ventilator performed well in vivo and demonstrated noninferior ventilation and oxygenation when compared with the standard ventilator. CONCLUSIONS: The Portsmouth Ventilator was able to perform well across all simulated pathologies and in vivo. All components may be acquired by the public for a cost of approximately $250 U.S.D. Although this ventilator has limited functionality compared with modern ventilators, the simple design appears to be safe and would allow for rapid mass production if ventilator surge demand exceeded supply.
Authors: Carol L Hodgson; David V Tuxen; Andrew R Davies; Michael J Bailey; Alisa M Higgins; Anne E Holland; Jenny L Keating; David V Pilcher; Andrew J Westbrook; David J Cooper; Alistair D Nichol Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Julienne LaChance; Manuel Schottdorf; Tom J Zajdel; Jonny L Saunders; Sophie Dvali; Chase Marshall; Lorenzo Seirup; Ibrahim Sammour; Robert L Chatburn; Daniel A Notterman; Daniel J Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Jonathan A Poli; Christopher Howard; Alfredo J Garcia; Don Remboski; Peter B Littlewood; John P Kress; Narayanan Kasthuri; Alia Comai; Kiran Soni; Philip Kennedy; John Ogger; Robert M DiBlasi Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2022-04-02