Ionic liquids have significantly enhanced ecofriendly benefits compared to the traditional inhibitors. In the present work, new four polymeric ionic liquids based on benzoimidazole derivatives were synthesized through the reaction of 2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole with alkyl halide to form PIL1. Then, Cl- anions were exchanged with different anions through the neutralization reaction to form other investigated polymers. Their structures were chemically elucidated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. Their influence on carbon steel (CS) as corrosion inhibitors has been checked with dielectric spectroscopy in addition to potentiodynamic polarization curves. It was found that the percentage of inhibition efficiency increases as inhibitor's concentrations increase, suggesting a decrease in the rate of CS corrosion. Additionally, the hydrogen evolution rate controlled by the four polymers was monitored. Addition of the prepared polymers lessened the rate of generation of hydrogen as the inhibitor's concentrations augmented. Scanning electric electron microscopy in addition to energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction has proved the morphology of the CS surface as well as the formed protective film.
Ionicliquids have significantly enhanced ecofriendly benefits compared to the traditional inhibitors. In the present work, new four polymericionicliquids based on benzoimidazole derivatives were synthesized through the reaction of 2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole with alkyl halide to form PIL1. Then, Cl- anions were exchanged with different anions through the neutralization reaction to form other investigated polymers. Their structures were chemically elucidated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. Their influence on carbon steel (CS) as corrosion inhibitors has been checked with dielectric spectroscopy in addition to potentiodynamic polarization curves. It was found that the percentage of inhibition efficiency increases as inhibitor's concentrations increase, suggesting a decrease in the rate of CScorrosion. Additionally, the hydrogen evolution rate controlled by the four polymers was monitored. Addition of the prepared polymers lessened the rate of generation of hydrogen as the inhibitor's concentrations augmented. Scanning electric electron microscopy in addition to energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction has proved the morphology of the CS surface as well as the formed protective film.
The utilization of
carbon steel (CS) is extensively prevalent in the production as well
as the transportation of both crude oil and natural gas because of
its nominal price, simple production, and significant mechanical merits.
Nevertheless, CS shows a high rate of corrosion.[1−6]Many of the pan class="Chemical">corrosion
inhibitors used in acidic media for CScorrosion control are particularly
toxic and harmful to the environment.[7−9] As a consequence, in recent years, ionicliquids
(ILs) have been designed and synthesized.
Ionicliquids’
application has been considered as a novel green approach owing to
their numerous interesting properties, for instance, low melting point
(lower than 100 °C), high polarization, low toxicity, insignificant
vapor pressure (which means they do not evaporate and not pollute
the environment), and thermal and chemical stability. Consequently,
ILs reduced the harmful impact on the environment, and this makes
them a perfect substitute for extremely volatile, traditional, harmful
corrosion inhibitors.[10,11]Ionicliquids (ILs) are
melted organic salts formed from both organiccations and several
inorganic anions with countless functional groups. ILs own a large
number of physicochemical properties,[12−15] essentially, nonflammability
and enhanced ionicconductivity, electricalconductivity, and solvent
transport, besides outstanding thermal and chemical steadiness. Generally,
ILs have N, S, and P as the essential atoms of cations. Besides, most
of these IL salts are established on imidazolium and pyridinium moieties
as cations, whereas the characteristic anions are sulfonates, tetrafluoroborates,
phosphates, and bis(triflouromethane-sulfonyl) imide.[16−18] Imidazoliumcompounds are stated
to show anticorrosion performance on various metals and alloys such
as aluminum, copper, mild steel, etc. Parveen et al. studied the corrosion
inhibitive action of imidazolium-based ionic liquids in 1 M H2SO4 on mild steel.[19] Likhanova and co-workers studied different imidazolium-type ionicliquidscontaining hexaflourophosphate as an anion in 1 M H2SO4, which have shown good efficiency as corrosion inhibitors
of carbon steel.[20] Atta et al. studied
the effect of different types of ammonium tosylate ionic liquids as
corrosion inhibitors on a carbon steel surface in 1 M HCl, which show
good anticorrosion properties.[21]The unique characteristics of ILs are the key for applying ILs in
innovative and new applications. In general, ILs are considered as
effective anticorrosion compounds for different metal surfaces owing
to their elevated activity in acidiccorrodent media.[22−24]The anticorrosion potential
of polymericionic liquid (PIL) nanoparticles via thiol-ene photo-polymerization
within a mini-emulsion was disclosed by Taghavikish et al.[25] Atta et al.[26] have
also investigated the boosted anticorrosion performance of a hyperbranched
PIL. Furthermore, in our previous work, PILs based on chitosan derivatives[27] and acrylamides[28] have also been reported.The present research was aimed to
synthesize four polymericionicliquids based on benzimidazole derivatives.
Their anticorrosion performance was tested for CS surface with lower
concentrations in HCl (hydrochloric acid, 1 M concentration). The
polymers under analysis were prepared through the reaction of 2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole with alkyl halide to
form PIL1. Then, the Cl– anion was exchanged with
different anions through the neutralization reaction to form other
investigated polymers.Their influence on carbon steel (CS)
as corrosion inhibitors has been checked with dielectric spectroscopy
(EIS), “Nyquist as well as bode plots”, in addition
to potentiodynamic polarization curves. Furthermore, the hydrogen
evolution rate regulated by the prepared polymers was monitored. Scanning
electron microscopy [SEM] in addition to energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction
(EDX) was used to examine the CS surface morphology to verify the
defensive films formed.
Results and Discussion
Polyionic liquid (PIL1) was synthesized
through the reaction of 2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (Sb1) with alkyl halide to form a monomer (IL1).
Thereupon, a radicalpolymerization reaction transformed this monomer
into an ionic liquid polymer (PIL1). The chloride (“Cl–”) anion of monomer IL1 was exchanged with different
anions to form the monomers IL2, IL3, and IL4. The monomers were transformed
to ionic liquid polymers (PIL2, PIL3, and PIL4) by the radicalpolymerization
reaction. As a result, an anticorrosive film protecting carbon steel
surfaces was formed. Scheme describes the chemically elucidated
structure of the polymericionicbenzimidazoleliquids.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of a Polymeric Ionic Liquid
(PIL1) Based on 2-Styryl Benzimidazole Derivatives and Exchange of
Anions to Prepare PIL2–4
PILs’ Characterization
The Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectrum of n>an class="Chemical">PIL1 is shown
in Figure a. The signals
at 3057.23 and 3022.47 cm–1 are assigned to the
stretching of aromatichydrogens. The signals at 2922.64 and 2852.58
cm–1 are allocated to asymmetric and symmetricC–H
stretching, respectively.
Figure 1
Chemical structure characterization of
the PIL1 inhibitor: (a) FTIR, (b) 1H NMR, and (c) 13C NMR.
pan class="Chemical">Chemin>an class="Chemical">cal structure characterization of
the PIL1 inhibitor: (a) FTIR, (b) 1H NMR, and (c) 13C NMR.
The bands at 1636.55, 1595.61, 1551.11,
and 1383.18 cm–1 are assigned to the C=N
stretching band, aromatic ring’s “C=C”
stretching, aromatic ring’s C-C stretching, and C-N vibrational
stretching, respectively. However, the strong peak at 711 cm–1 is assigned to the C-H bending of the (CH2) skeleton. The polymerization reaction has been ascertained
through the disappearing of the characteristic vinyl band (=C-H,
out-of-plane bending) at 985 cm–1.Figure b displays the 1H NMR spectrum of PIL1. Lack of C=CH signals within
the range of 5–6.5 ascertains the occurrence of polymerization.
Furthermore, signals were displayed at chemical shifts of 0.86 ppm
(t, 6H, (CH2)11-CH3), 1.25 (t, 44H, (CH2)11-CH3), 1.71 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2), and 3.2 (1H, N=C-CH-CH-Ph) of polymerized hydrogens, 3.6 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2), and 7.23–7.87 (m,
9H, Ar H). Figure c displays the 13C NMR spectrum of PIL1. It indicates
signals at 141.82–127.33 (N-Ph &
CH-Ph) and 29.44 ((CH2)).The FTIR spectrum
of PIL2 is shown in S1(a). The bands at
2921.77 and 2852.72 cm–1 are allocated to asymmetrical
and symmetricalC–H stretching, respectively. The bands at
1711, 1639.74, 1596.86, 1547.73, 1391.90, and 1306.31 cm–1 are assigned to the carbonyl C=O ester stretching, C=N
stretching, aromatic ring’s “C=C” stretching,
aromatic ring’s C-C stretching, C-N vibrational stretching,
and C-O vibrational stretching, respectively. However, the strong
band at 718.63 cm–1 is assigned to the C-H bending
of skeletal (CH2). The absence
of the 985 cm–1 band for the vinyl group (=CH
out-of-plane bending) ascertains the occurrence of polymerization. S1(b) illustrates the 1H NMR spectrum
of PIL2. Lack of C=CH signals within the range of 5 to 6.5
ascertains the occurrence of polymerization. Moreover, chemical shifts’
signals are obvious at 0.86 ppm (t, 6H, (CH2)11-CH3), 1.25 (t, 44H, (CH2)11-CH3), 1.71 (t,
4H, N-CH2-CH2), 3.2 (t,
1H, N=C-CH-CH-Ph) of polymerized hydrogens,
3.6 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2), and 7.08–7.86 (m, 14H, Ar H). S1(c) displays the 13C NMR spectrum of PIL2. It demonstrates
signals at δ 169.91 (O-C=O), 126.70–140.9 (Ar
C), 31.7 (N-CH2-(CH2)), 29.44 (N-CH2-(CH2)), and 14.36 (N-(CH2)-CH3).S2 (a) demonstrates the FTIR spectrum for PIL3. The
signals at 3057.22 and 3031.14 cm–1 are assigned
to the aromatichydrogens.[29] Bands at 2922.77
and 2853.00 cm–1 are allocated to asymmetrical and
symmetricalC −H stretching, respectively. The band at 2807.92
cm–1 is allocated to the aldehydehydrogen. Bands
at 1702.54, 1639.88, 1551.36, 1449.71, and 1415.61 cm–1 are allocated to the carbonyl esterC=O stretching, C=N
stretching, aromatic ring’s C-C stretching, C-N vibrational
stretching, and C-O vibrational stretching, respectively. The strong
band at 708.18 cm–1 is assigned to the C- H bending
of skeletal (CH2). The absence
of the 985 cm–1 band for the vinyl group (=CH
out-of-plane bending) ascertains the occurrence of polymerization. S2(b) illustrates the 1H NMR spectrum
of PIL3. Lack of C=CH signals within the range of 5 to 6.5
ascertains the occurrence of polymerization. In addition, chemical
shifts’ signals are clear at 0.87 ppm (t, 6H, (CH2)11-CH3), 1.25 (t, 44H,
(CH2)11-CH3), 1.71 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2), 3.2 (t, 1H, N=C-CH-CH-Ph) of polymerized
hydrogens, 3.60 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2), 7.28–7.90 (m, 9H, Ar H), and 8.51 ppm (s, 1H, H-COO–). S2 (c) displays the 13C NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6, 400 MHZ) of PIL3. It demonstrates
signals at δ 166.5 (H-C=O), 127.6–140.9 (N-Ph & CH-Ph), 31.0 (N-CH2-(CH2)), 27.00 (N-CH2-(CH2)), and 14.00 (N-(CH2)-CH3).S3(a) displays the FTIR spectrum of PIL4,
The bands at 3371.69 and 3043.72 cm–1 are assigned
to NH2 and aromatichydrogens, respectively. The 2922.12
and 2852.62 cm–1 bands are allocated to the asymmetric
and symmetricC–H stretching, respectively. The 1639.31, 1545.17,
1449.99, and 1388.89 cm–1 bands are ascribed to
the C=N stretching, aromatic ring’s C-C stretching,
C-N vibrational stretching, and C-O vibrational stretching, respectively.
The strong band at 723.56 cm–1 is assigned to the
C-H bending of skeletal (CH2). The absence of the 985 cm–1 band for the vinyl
group (=CH out-of-plane bending) ascertains the occurrence
of polymerization. S3(b) shows the 1H NMR spectrum of PIL4. Lack of C=CH signals within
the range of 5 to 6.5 ascertains the occurrence of polymerization.
Additionally, chemical shifts’ signals are displayed at 0.88
ppm (t, 6H, (CH2)11-CH3, 3J = 4), 1.23 (t, 44H,
(CH2)11-CH3), 3.58 (t, 1H, N=C-CH-CH-Ph) of polymerized
hydrogens, 3.62 (t, 4H, N-CH2-CH2, 3J = 4), 4.37 (br, 2H, NH2), and 7.08–7.89 (m, 14H, Ar H). S3(c) illustrates the 13C NMR spectrum of PIL4.
It illustrates signals at δ 169.41 (O – C=O),
122.96–129.42 (Ar C), 31.0 (N - CH2-(CH2)), 29.41 (N-CH2-(CH2)), and 14.00 (N-(CH2)-CH3).
Hydrogen
Evolution Reaction (HER) Quantification
Figures and S4 illustrate the volume of H2 gas
generated from n>an class="Gene">CScorrosion in a 1 M HCl solution with time when PIL
inhibitors are absent and also in their presence. A significant increase
in H2 was obvious as the immersion period increased. The
hydrogen generation rate (Hr) was calculated
using eq .
Figure 2
Volume
of hydrogen evolved with time for carbon steel in 1 mol L–1 HCl with and without various concentrations of PIL1 inhibitor.
Volume
of pan class="Chemical">hydrogen evolved with time for n>an class="Chemical">carbon steel in 1 mol L–1 HCl with and without various concentrations of PIL1 inhibitor.
In
addition, adding severpan class="Chemical">al concentrations of PIL1, PIL2, PIL3, and PIL4
disturbs the hydrogen generation rates (Hr) as can be observed in Figure , since as PILs’ concentrations increase, Hr decreases.
Figure 3
Relation between hydrogen
generation rates and logarithmic inhibitor concentrations for carbon
steel in 1 mol L–1 HCl.
Relation between pan class="Chemical">hydrogen
generation rates and logarithmin>an class="Chemical">c inhibitor concentrations for carbonsteel in 1 mol L–1 HCl.
Equation was used to assess the effipan class="Chemical">cienn>an class="Chemical">cy (IH%) of PILs for regulating H2 evolution. Figure demonstrates the
inhibitors’ efficiency (IH%) plotted
versus logarithmicPILs’ concentrations. It has been concluded
that the effect of PILs on inhibition increases as their concentrations
increase. In fact, PIL1 > PIL2 > PIL3 > PIL4 was the order
of the inhibitors’ anticorrosion effectiveness.
Figure 4
Variation of
the efficiency of inhibitors with logarithmic
inhibitors’ concentrations in 1 mol L–1 HCl.
Variation of
the effipan class="Chemical">cienn>an class="Chemical">cy of inhibitors with logarithmic
inhibitors’ concentrations in 1 mol L–1 HCl.
These
PIL inhibitors inhibit the CS dissociation in HCl and, thus, delay
and obstruct the cathodicH2 generation reaction through
adsorption at the metal/acidic solution interface. The strength of
the prepared PILs to inhibit the hydrogen evolution is significantly
influenced by the inhibitors’ chemical structures.[30] Inhibitors of PIL type are capable of creating
a thin film on the CS surface. The heteroatoms (predominantly N and
O) transfer their electrons (charges) to the metal’s d-orbitals.
Then, they form a strong shielding cover on the metal through forming
coordinate bonds (called the chemisorption mechanism). Also, the existence
of homoatomic “>C=C<” or heteroatomic “>C=O,
> C=N–” multiple bonds enriches the ability
of the inhibitor molecules to be adsorbed by improving the electron
donating tendency resulting from extensive conjugation.Throughout
the metal–inhibitor interactions, the negatively charged metallic
surface (due to adsorption of counterions of the electrolytes) attracted
the positively charged (+N) PIL inhibitor molecules via
electrostatic attractions.[1] These electrostatic
attractions showed that, in an acidic electrolyte, interaction of
inhibitor molecules (having heteroatoms) with metal surfaces includes
a physisorption mechanism. Then, it was followed by a chemisorption
mechanism in the final interaction stage.There is a synergistic
effect between the cation and the anion of the corrosion inhibitors.
PIL1 offers high corrosion resistance as compared to other synthesized
PILs because of the presence of chloride ions. The presence of halide
ions assists the adsorption of organic inhibitors through forming
intermediate bridges between positively charged inhibitor molecules
and the carbon steel surface. Consequently, corrosion inhibition synergism
results from increasing surface coverage as a result of ion-pair interactions
between the organiccation and the anion.[31]
Potentiodynamic
Polarization (PDP) Measurements
Steel electrochemical polarization
curves attained in 1 M HCl solution with and without different PIL
inhibitor concentrations
are shown in Figures and S5. Dwindling was observed in anodicalong with cathodiccurrents in the case when the inhibitor was present.
The decline became more apparent at higher inhibitor concentrations.
The arrangement of a protective overlay to protect the steel surface
against the corrosion medium may be the logical reason for the apparent
decline, since inhibitor’s adsorption on the steel surface
minimizes the hydrogen evolution [cathode’s reaction] as well
as minifies iron metal deterioration [the reaction at the anode].
Figure 5
Polarization plots of
the steel electrode attained in 1 mol L–1 HCl solution
with and without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
pan class="Chemical">Polarization plots of
the n>an class="Chemical">steel electrode attained in 1 mol L–1 HCl solution
with and without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
Parameters such as the corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (Icorr) in addition to Tafel slopes of the cathode (βc)
and anode (βa) have been extracted from the polarization curves
and then gathered and tabulated in Table . The degree of surface coverage (θ)
and the inhibition efficacy (IE%) are computed through eqs and 2, respectively.[32−34]in which Icor(1) and Icor(2) are the corrosion current densities in the absence
and presence of the inhibitor, respectively.
Table 1
Corrosion Parameters Obtained from
Polarization Curves for PIL1, PIL2, PIL3, and PIL4 Polymerizable Ionic
Liquid Inhibitors
inhibitor
concentration (ppm)
βa
(mV)
βc (mV)
Ecorr (mV)
Icorr (mA/cm2)
θ
IE%
blank
000
162.1
–188.5
–493
3.47
PIL1
50
226.7
–219.7
–489.8
0.119
0.9657
96.57
100
245.1
–234
–441
0.062
0.9821
98.2
150
137.5
–147.8
–503.5
0.054
0.9844
79.8
200
102.6
–140.9
–486.7
0.041
0.9881
98.8
250
190.2
–102
–540.5
0.021
0.9939
99.3
PIL2
50
334.2
–321.5
–517.5
0.17
0.9510
95.1
100
311.5
–341
–532.2
0.09
0.9740
97.4
150
121.8
–138.3
–508.8
0.069
0.9801
98
200
112.4
–134.6
–507.6
0.063
0.9818
98.18
250
103.4
–155.9
–499.4
0.05
0.9855
98.55
PIL3
50
198
–142.2
–590
0.232
0.9331
93.3
100
122.2
–139.5
–502.6
0.105
0.9697
96.97
150
76.6
–134.3
–521.7
0.098
0.9717
97.1
200
119.4
–141
–510.1
0.070
0.9798
97.98
250
160
–145.9
–511
0.063
0.9818
98.1
PIL4
50
99.6
–161.6
–469.8
0.47
0.8645
86.45
100
129.2
–159.4
–529
0.241
0.9305
93
150
82.3
–144
–520
0.20
0.9423
94.2
200
78.3
–130.1
–510.4
0.095
0.9726
97.26
250
73.8
–130.6
–500.8
0.0924
0.9733
97.33
Table lists the IE percentages with
increasing inhibitor levels. It has been shown that IE percentages
increased as the inhibitor’s concentrations were augmented,
due to an increase in the amount of inhibitors’ accumulation
along with adsorption on the steel surface. This process thus leads
to a high inhibition of corrosion. At 250 ppm concentration of PIL1,
the utmost efficient inhibition was approximately 99.3%.The
use of different techniques may be the logical reason for the dissimilar
values of the IE% obtained from the potentiodynamic polarization technique
and the hydrogen evolution technique. Furthermore, the inhibitor may
be named anodic or cathodic if the value of Ecorr surpasses 85 mV. Table shows the various values of Ecorr with an utmost Ecorr value
of less than 85 mV indicating the mixed corrosion mode (disrupting
both the anodic and the cathodic reactions together).[35] Nonetheless, a slight change in Ecorr in cathodic patterns makes the cathodic path more clear.
Potentiodynamic results show the effective cutting down of steel’s
corrosion when using the formulated PILs even at minifying concentrations
in 1 M HCl.Vpan class="Chemical">alues of mean and standard deviation (SD) for the
corrosion current density for the carbon steel electrode at different
concentrations of PIL inhibitors in a 1 M HCl solution are indicated
in S6.
The inhibitory activity
can also be examined utilizing the EIS
technique in aggressive 1 M HCl mediaalone and also while employing
diverse concentrations of PIL1, PIL2, PIL3, and PIL4.The Nyquist
plots for different PILconcentrations with fitting curves are shown
in Figures and S7. Throughout Figures and S7, the capacitive
loop’s diameter in the Nyquist graph increases with the increase
in the concentrations of the inhibitor. This clearly implies that
steel deterioration primarily depends on the charge transfer reaction.[36−38]
Figure 6
Nyquist plots for the
carbon steel electrode in a 1 mol L–1 HCl solution
with and without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
Nyquist plots for the
pan class="Chemical">carbon steel electrode in a 1 mol L–1 HCl solution
with and without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
Rct [charge transfer resistance] and Cdl [double layer capacitance] values gained from Nyquist plots
are then collected in Table . Reduced Cdl values and increased Rct values in the presence of PIL inhibitors
affirm their protective efficiency depending on their concentrations.
A reduction in Cdl values may have occurred
due to the decrease in the electric double layer thickness, since
PIL moieties [with a minimal dielectricconstant] swap water molecules
[with a high dielectricconstant]. On the whole, corrosion is related
to the behavior of the double layer. Therefore, action of inhibitors
includes their arrangement as well as adsorption through replacing
aquatic molecules from the interface between steel and the corroding
medium.[39]
Table 2
Impedance
Parameters Obtained from EIS Curves for PIL1, PIL2, PIL3, and PIL4
Polymerizable Ionic Liquid Inhibitors
inhibitor
concentration
(ppm)
Rct (Ohm)
Cdl (μF/cm2)
θ
IE%
blank
000
16.97
680.2
PIL1
50
399.8
90.26
0.9575
95.75
100
430
84.16
0.9605
96.05
150
479
74.34
0.9645
96.45
200
528.8
120.3
0.9679
96.79
250
539.3
62.6
0.9685
96.85
PIL2
50
211.3
84.76
0.9196
91.96
100
322.5
78.80
0.9473
94.73
150
371.3
68.40
0.9542
95.42
200
408.1
70.11
0.9584
95.84
250
489.1
65.49
0.9653
96.53
PIL3
50
236.8
142.7
0.9283
92.83
100
346.9
82.62
0.9510
95.1
150
369.7
77.65
0.9540
95.4
200
421.8
50.5
0.9597
95.97
250
454
42.39
0.9626
96.26
PIL4
50
99
158.89
0.8285
82.85
100
159.8
131.65
0.8938
89.38
150
213.5
88.1
0.9205
92.05
200
274.6
65.20
0.9382
93.82
250
316.3
50.38
0.9463
94.63
As the inhibitor concentrations
augmented, both Rct and IE% values increased,
as observed in Figures and S7 and also in Table . The effectiveness of the inhibition (IE%)
can be computed through utilizing eq 3.(40−42)in which Rct1 and Rct2 are the charge
transfer resistance in the uninhibited and inhibited solutions, respectively.In impedances, Rct values were determined
through variation at lesser and higher frequencies. The use of different
techniques may be the logical reason for the dissimilar values of
the IE% obtained from the potentiodynamic impedance technique and
the hydrogen evolution technique. At a concentration of 250 ppm of
PIL1, extreme efficacy (96.85%) inhibition was achieved. The utmost
inhibition efficacy of 96.85% was achieved at 250 ppm of the PIL1
inhibitor.The Bode as well as phase angle graphs for CS in
hydrochloric acid whose concentration is 1 M alone as well as in the
presence of PILs are shown in Figures and S8. A spectrum of frequency
was implemented for the Bode phase plot to explain and also clarify
the enhanced phenomena occurring at the interfaces. A phase angle
has been employed at higher frequencies to give an overall indication
of the inhibition efficiency. The phase angle at high frequencies
was applied to get an overall indication for the inhibitory efficiency.
The phase angle of −90° is well known to have
a perfect capacitive action.
Figure 7
Bode plots for a carbon
steel electrode in 1 mol L–1 HCl solution with and
without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
pan class="Chemical">Bode plots for a n>an class="Chemical">carbon
steel electrode in 1 mol L–1 HCl solution with and
without various concentrations of the PIL1 inhibitor.
The regular accretion in the phase
angle shift near the effective capacitive action as the inhibitor
concentrations increased is obvious in Figures and S8.[43,44] The absolute impedance increased in the Bode plot at lower frequencies.
This emphasizes that the formed protective overlay with the increase
in the amount of the inhibitor is accompanied by the inhibitors’
adsorption impact on the CS surface.
Surface
Morphology Examination
To observe
the morphology of the CS surface, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
has been performed. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry
was carried out to identify the composition of the CS surface elements
prior to and after immersion of the inhibitor in the corroding medium. Figure a depicts the EDX
bands for the adsorbed elements on the CS surface in the case of blank
solution. Signals of O and Fe prove that iron oxide is present in
the solution, resulting from metal dissolution on the anodic reaction.
Additionally, after dipping into HCl solution (1 M) with no inhibitor
(blank), the SEM picture is also illustrated in Figure a. A coarse and heavily corroded surface
has been observed with total destruction on the CS surface.
Figure 8
EDX and SEM for the (a)
sample after immersion in 1 M HCl without the inhibitor (blank) and
(b) sample after immersion in 1 M HCl solution containing 250 ppm
PIL1 inhibitor.
EDX and SEM for the (a)
sample after immerpan class="Chemical">sion in 1 M n>an class="Chemical">HCl without the inhibitor (blank) and
(b) sample after immersion in 1 M HCl solution containing 250 ppm
PIL1 inhibitor.
In Figure b, on adding
250 ppm PIL1 inhibitor, the EDX spectrum displays additionalsignals,
approving the existence of C and N atoms in the PIL1 inhibitor. Moreover,
the signals of Fe are significantly inhibited, compared to those
of the samples in Figure a, because of formation of a defensive inhibitor film. The
SEM picture in Figure b displays a perfect reduction in the rusted zones produced by the
inhibitor molecules being adsorbed on the CS surface. In this way,
a shielding film was formed on the CS surface but not on the CS surface
dipped into the aggressive corroding media lacking the inhibitors.
EDX and SEM examinations ascertain the growth of an inhibitive film
on the CS surface and, hence, the Fe dissolution was inhibited and
the hydrogen gas evolved, resulting from corrosion, was hindered.
Corrosion Inhibition
Mechanism
The pictorial diagram for the inhibition mechanism
on carbon steel surface in 1 M HClcan be seen in Figure . The anion improves the adsorption
ability of the organiccation by forming a connecting bridge between
the negatively charged metal surface and the organic inhibitor and
synergistically increases the corrosion inhibition ability of organiccompounds significantly.[31] The adsorption
of anions makes the CS surface negatively charged, as a result making
it easier for organiccations to be adsorbed on the CS surface by
electron interactions. This is the physical adsorption.
Figure 9
Diagram
depicting the corrosion inhibition mechanism of studied inhibitors
on carbon steel surface in 1 M HCl solution.
Diagram
depipan class="Chemical">cting the corrosion inhibition mechanism of studied inhibitors
on carbon steel surface in 1 M HCl solution.
Chemically,
the inhibitor molecule directly reacts with the CS surface to form
a coordination bond, and this process is called chemical adsorption.
As a result, a defensive film is formed on the CS surface by the physicochemical
adsorption of inhibitor molecules for protection against the corrosive
ion attack. In addition, the synergism between cations and anions
of ionicliquids offers good protection for the CS surface.
Conclusions
Four
new polymericionicliquids (PILs) have been chemically synthesized
based on styryl benzoimidazole derivatives and assessed as anticorrosion
agents. Spectroscopic techniques such as 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and FTIR spectroscopy chemically elucidated the structures
of the new polymers. CScorrosion was measured in HCl (1 M), as a
source for generating H2 gas and as an acidic medium. Addition
of the PILs diminished the rate of hydrogen production. The H2 generation rate reduced as PILs’ concentrations increased.
Electrochemical methods such as polarization and impedance revealed
that the PIL inhibitors have improved anticorrosive properties in
the corrodent medium for CS surface. The percentage of inhibition
efficiency increased as the inhibitor concentrations increased in
the solution of 1 M hydrogen chloride, demonstrating a decrease in
the CScorrosion rate. Further, the effectiveness order was PIL1 >
PIL2 > PIL3 > PIL4. The experimental values achieved from polarization,
impedance, and hydrogen evolution methods were in good agreement and
showed the same trend. Morphological studies (SEM and also EDX) verified
the formation of a defensive overlay of PILs on the surface of CS,
hence ensuring the protection of steel surface. In addition, there
is a synergistic effect between cations and anions of the corrosion
inhibitors. In conclusion, ionicliquids offer a potential opportunity
for pioneering applications for green chemistry. Unlimited growth
in this field is expected due to the outstandingly superior, ecofriendly,
and sustainable benefits of these compounds compared to conventional
and known inhibitors.
Experimental Section
Materials
O-Phenylenediamine, cinnamic
acid, tetradecylchloride, and m-amino sodium benzoate
were purchased from AldrichChemicals Company and used with no further
purification. Benzoyl peroxide was purchased from Merck and used as
a radical initiator. Hydrochloric acid was obtained from BDHCompany.
Distilled water was used for preparing all test solutions. The corrosive
acid environment was 1 M HCl.Tests were performed on carbonsteel (CS) of type X-65, which was attained from an unutilized oil
pipeline and was used as the working electrode in the experiments.
It has the following composition: Mn, 1.51; Si, 0.23; C, 0.08; Ni,
0.05; S, 0.04; Al, 0.03; Cu, 0.02; Cr, 0.02; P, 0.02; Mo, 0.005; and
V, 0.002, whereas Fe is the remaining part. A saturated calomel electrode
(SCE) as a reference electrode and a platinum (Pt) electrode as an
auxiliary electrode were utilized.
Synthesis
Procedure
Synthesis of 2-Styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (Sb1)
pan class="Chemical">O-Phenylenediamine
(0.01 mol) was dissolved in n>an class="Chemical">ethanol, and cinnamic acid (0.01 mol)
was added. Then, the mixture was refluxed for 3 h at 80 °C. The
reaction mixture was cooled, and sodium carbonate solution was added
to basify. The product was precipitated by adding 20 mL of cold water.
Then, the product was filtered, washed with cold water, and subsequently
recrystallized from the aqueous solution to get the product “2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole”, labeled as
Sb1.
Synthesis
of Ionic Liquid of Styrylbenzoimidazole (IL1)
Sb1 (0.01 mol)
was dissolved in n>an class="Chemical">ethanol, and potassium hydroxide (0.02 mol) was added.
The mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 30 min. To the reaction
mixture under stirring, tetradecylchloride (0.022 mol) was added dropwise.
Then, the mixture was heated at 70–80 °C for 24 h. The
mixture was then cooled down to ambient temperature. The substance
was subsequently extracted with ethanol, washed with ethyl acetate,
filtered, and finally dried to give oily products with the IL1 label.
Synthesis of Polymeric
Ionic Liquid of Styrylbenzoimidazole (PIL1)
The benzoyl peroxide
initiator (0.5 wt % monomer) was added to IL1 dissolved in water,
and thereupon the temperature was elevated to 70 °C and maintained
for about 10 h. The product was precipitated by addition of 250 mL
of acetone. Then, the product was filtered, washed with diethyl ether
as well as absolute methanol, and finally dried in a vacuum at 20
°C to attain the PILs.
Synthesis
of Polymeric Ionic Liquids Labeled as PIL2–4
pan class="Gene">IL1 (0.001
mol) was dissolved in n>an class="Chemical">water, and sodium benzoate (0.001
mol) was introduced.
The mixture was refluxed for 6 h to produce
IL2. Benzoyl peroxide (0.5 wt % monomer) was then introduced to the
refluxed mixture, and subsequently, the temperature was increased
to 70 °C and maintained for about 10 h. Afterward, the reaction
mixture was cooled and acetone (250 mL) was added. The precipitate
thus formed was filtered off, washed with absolute methanol as well
as diethyl ether, and finally dried at 20 °C under vacuum. The
formed polymer was labeled as PIL2. The same procedure was used to
synthesize PIL3 and PIL4 using sodium formate and m-amino sodium benzoate, respectively.
Spectroscopic
Assessments
The molecular
strun>an class="Chemical">cture of the prepared ionic liquid polymers was assessed through
analyses like infrared (IR) as well as 1H NMR, in addition
to 13C NMR spectra. Infrared (IR) analysis was performed
utilizing a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer, FTIR, Bruker.
The spectrometer [Bruker Advance DRX-400] along with the solvent DMSO-d6 was utilized for 13C NMR and 1H NMR analyses. The spectrometer has a resonance frequency
of 400 MHz.
Water repn>lacement
is the technique used to estimate the rate of hydrogen evolution.
This method aimed to quantify hydrogen evolution is parallel to that
described earlier.[45,46] First, the corroding medium (1
M HCl), 100 mL, was put into a glass container. A CScoupon, having
dimensions of 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm × 2 mm, was immersed within
the corroding medium. This vessel was immediately locked up to avoid
the leakage of H2 gas. Thereupon, the amount of H2 gas produced was recorded at almost fixed times during the corrosion
reaction. The hydrogen gas volume was measured on the basis of the
fact that the gas volume (in cm3) replaces the water level
in the burette.The following expression[47] was used to evaluate the hydrogen generation rate (Hr)where v2 and v1 are the
volumes of H2 gas produced at t2 and t1 time intervals, respectively.
Additionally, the efficacy of PILs (IH %) for governing hydrogen gas production was revealed using the
following equationin which Hro and Hr are the rates of
evolution of hydrogen in the absence and presence of the readily prepared
PILs, respectively.
Electrochemical Measurements
Potentiostat n>an class="Chemical">PGZ 402 [Voltalab
80 Tacussel Radiometer] was run to perform the electrochemical measurements.
The Voltamaster-4 program was used to perform
these measurements. A 100 mL electrochemical glass cell with 3 electrodes’
spaces has been used. The electrochemicalcell was filled with the
corroding medium (100 mL of 1 M HCl). The carbon steel was the working
electrode (WE).
A saturated pan class="Chemical">calomel electrode [SCE] as the reference
electrode and a platinum [Pt] electrode as an auxiliary electrode
were utilized.
Moreover, the SCE was connected to a Luggin capillary.
The capillary slope was made adjacent to the WE surface to lessen
the potential drop (IR drop). All potential values
were quantified versus SCE. Prior to all tests, the CS electrode’s
surface was hand-glazed with various specific emery sheets, subsequently
washed with distilled water, and ultimately dried. After keeping for
an hour in the test solution, the electrode potential was stabilized
to maintain a steady-state “open-circuit potential”.
An electrode area of 1 cm2 was exposed to the devastating
media. The whole steps function at ambient temperature and exposed
the electrochemicalcell to air.
Surface
Morphology Studies
For this research,
a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) instrument of model Quanta 250
FEG and an EDX (energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction) instrument were
employed.The applied accelerating voltage was 30 kV, and the
magnification force was X = 2000. The surface morphological
properties were tested through dipping the carbon steel (CS) coupon
in the blank solution as well as in the inhibitor solution containing
certain concentration of the prepared inhibitor.