Alexander T Zdvizhkov1,2, Krists Smogorzevskis1, Martin van Duin1,3, Francesco Picchioni1. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, the Netherlands. 2. Interbranch Engineering Center "Composites of Russia" of Bauman Moscow State University, Lefortovskaya emb, 1, Moscow 105005, Russian Federation. 3. ARLANXEO Performance Elastomers, Innovation, P.O. Box 1130, 6160 BC Geleen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
In this paper, we present the formation of reversible covalently cross-linked networks in ethylene propylene rubber with grafted anthracene groups (EPM-g-AN) based on the principles of photoinduced anthracene dimerization. First, an industrial-grade EPM rubber grafted with maleic anhydride functional groups (EPM-g-MA) was modified with 9-anthracenemethanol. By irradiating EPM-g-AN with UV light (365 nm), the anthracene moieties dimerize via [4 + 4]cycloaddition, forming a covalent network. The network cleavage proceeds at high temperatures (>170 °C), even if with considerable (chemical) degradation. Furthermore, one of the degradation routes has been identified by 1H NMR to occur via the ester bond cleavage releasing 9-anthracenemethanol. Nevertheless, the reversibility of cross-linking has been achieved by performing the reverse reaction in decalin. The UV-vis spectroscopy clearly shows that the de-cross-linking process in these conditions is due to the anthracene dimer cleavage. Although the recovery in mechanical properties upon recycling is yet to be optimized, the disclosed results pave the way toward the use of anthracene chemistry in thermally reversible networks with possible industrial perspective applications.
In this paper, we present the formation of reversible covalently cross-linked networks in ethylene propylene rubber with grafted anthracene groups (EPM-g-AN) based on the principles of photoinduced anthracene dimerization. First, an industrial-grade EPM rubber grafted with maleic anhydride functional groups (EPM-g-MA) was modified with 9-anthracenemethanol. By irradiating EPM-g-AN with UV light (365 nm), the anthracene moieties dimerize via [4 + 4]cycloaddition, forming a covalent network. The network cleavage proceeds at high temperatures (>170 °C), even if with considerable (chemical) degradation. Furthermore, one of the degradation routes has been identified by 1H NMR to occur via the ester bond cleavage releasing 9-anthracenemethanol. Nevertheless, the reversibility of cross-linking has been achieved by performing the reverse reaction in decalin. The UV-vis spectroscopy clearly shows that the de-cross-linking process in these conditions is due to the anthracene dimer cleavage. Although the recovery in mechanical properties upon recycling is yet to be optimized, the disclosed results pave the way toward the use of anthracene chemistry in thermally reversible networks with possible industrial perspective applications.
Cross-linked thermoset resins constitute
one of the most significant
pillars of the polymer industry. Indeed, these materials cannot be
dissolved and do not melt and, as result, show higher strength in
comparison with un-cross-linked thermoplastics. Their use is more
preferable as compared to thermoplastic if high performance is required,
such as in high-temperature applications. For instance, cross-linked
materials are applied in aircraft body manufacturing,[1−3] adhesives,[4,5] fuel tanks,[6] and car tires.[7]However,
processing of thermosets is a difficult process, if possible
at all after the shaping step, since such procedures are carried out
at elevated temperatures, which may result in spontaneous curing of
the gear. The fast growth of the polymer industry also entails new
regulations on the recyclability of polymer products.[8] Nowadays, the reactions for thermoset curing are not reversible.
The most common processes are free-radical cross-linking with peroxides[9−11] and difunctional acrylates or styrene,[12] hydrosilylation of polyvinysiloxanes,[13−16] and epoxide ring cleavage.[17−22] As a result, materials based on these curing chemical routes are
not able to be recycled and/or reused (as a new polymer) and are usually
disposed of as raw waste or ground to a powder (with a significant
decrease in economic value) to be used as a filler.Recently
a reversible Diels–Alder (DA) reaction has been
applied for thermoreversibly cross-linked rubber[23] and thermosets.[24] Nevertheless,
some irreversible cross-linking reactions may take place under the
same experimental conditions (high temperature) in which the de-cross-linking
retro-DA reaction occurs.[25] Moreover, for
some manufacturing protocols, e.g., three-dimensional (3D) printing,[26] photoinduced cross-linking is more preferable.The photoinduced anthracene coupling reaction ([4 + 4]-cycloaddition)
is a common process in material chemistry.[27] Anthracene coupling or dimerization proceeds under UV irradiation
with the wavelength exceeding 300 nm.[28] The reverse reaction might be initiated also by UV radiation (<300
nm)[28] or thermally above 170 °C.[29] Reversible cross-linked polymers coupled via
anthracene moieties were described earlier.[28−30] However, these
works, despite delivering convincing proof-of-principle for the concept,
often do not contain any practical investigation of the recyclability
of the final product, as well as a systematic comparison of the thermo-
and photoinduced routes to dimer cleavage and thus de-cross-linking.In the present work, we report the results of our research on ethylene
propylene rubber with grafted anthracene groups (EPM-g-AN) cured via
anthracene moiety dimerization under UV-irradiation exposure and the
UV- and thermally induced recyclability of this thermoset material
(Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Synthesis
and Curing of EPM-g-AN
Commercially available EPM-g-MA was treated with 9-anthracenemethanol
to yield anthracene-containing EPM rubber (EPM-g-AN). UV irradiation
results in polymer cross-linking. The cured rubber might be converted
to a de-cross-linked processable form under exposure to either UV
irradiation or increased temperature (above 170 °C).
Results and Discussion
EPM-g-MA
Rubber Modification with 9-Anthracenemethanol
To graft the
EPM-g-MA rubber with anthracene moieties (Scheme ), 9-anthracenemethanol was
mixed with EPM-g-MA in a Brabender at 170 °C and 50 rpm for 4
min under N2.
Scheme 2
Anthracene Grafting on EPM-g-MA
Such conditions were chosen to ensure the thorough
melting of 9-anthracenemethanol
(melting point: 160.0–167.0 °C) and thus optimal mixing
with EPM-g-MA. In addition, the reaction was performed under N2 to avoid oxidation and other side reactions. Two times the
stoichiometric amount of 9-anthracenemethanol was used with respect
to the MA functional groups of EPM-g-MA to ensure higher conversion.
After performing the reaction in Brabender, the resulting polymer
was purified by reprecipitation to ensure the removal of the unreacted
excess 9-anthracenemethanol. The agreement between the theoretically
calculated composition and the experimentally measured values (see Experimental Section) confirms 100% conversion of
maleic groups to N-furfurylimide groups. Furthermore, UV–vis
and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results confirm qualitatively
that the grafting was successful to yield EPM-g-AN (Figure ).
Figure 1
(a) UV absorbance spectrum
of EPM-g-AN. (b) FTIR of EPM-g-AN and
EPM-g-MA.
(a) UV absorbance spectrum
of EPM-g-AN. (b) FTIR of EPM-g-AN and
EPM-g-MA.Indeed, a typical anthracene peak
between 300 and 400 nm indicates
the presence of anthracene groups along the polymer backbone. Also,
we can observe a slight shift of carbonyl peaks in the FTIR spectrum
(Figure b), attributed
to the conversion of the anhydride into ester and acid groups. Indeed,
the split of the peak at 1710–1720 cm–1 in
FTIR confirms the transformation of anhydride group into an ester,
1717 cm–1, and acid groups, 1709 cm–1. These pieces of evidence, together with the very thorough washing
of the product by reprecipitation in acetone, clearly suggest the
successful grafting of anthracene along the polymer backbone. A more
detailed characterization (chemical and/or spectroscopic) is hindered
by the polymeric nature of the product, resulting, for example in
relevant noise in the FTIR spectrum (vide supra), as well as the relatively
low amount of functional groups along the backbone. Nevertheless,
it must be stressed here that the presented result is in agreement
with the previous one obtained in our group on a very similar system.[23,31,32]
UV-Cross-Linking of EPM-g-AN
Rubber
The main idea of
this work is based on the ability of anthracene for UV-assisted dimerization.
This reaction has several advantages as compared for example to the
often used DA reaction between furan and maleimide. In the first instance,
the direct and reverse reactions for anthracene are initiated by different
sources (irradiation and heat), which allows them to occur independently.
Differently from this, the retro-DA reaction is initiated by higher
temperatures than the direct DA, thus allowing possible partial cross-linking
only while cooling down.The formation of a reversibly cross-linked
network by the principles of UV-induced [4 + 4] cycloaddition between
anthracene moieties in EPM-g-AN rubber is attempted (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Reversible Cross-Linking
of EPM-g-AN Rubber
From EPM-g-AN, bars
are prepared by compression molding at 130
°C, 50 bar for 30 min. To induce cross-linking, the bars are
irradiated under a UV lamp (λ = 365 nm) and consequently characterized
by tensile testing.The stress–strain diagram, shown
in Figure , illustrates
that higher stresses and significantly
lower strains at the break, compared to the un-cross-linked counterpart,
can be detected.
Figure 2
EPM-g-AN Tensile Properties.
EPM-g-AN Tensile Properties.The cross-linked bars have notably higher average Young’s
modulus and ultimate tensile strength values. Furthermore, the average
elongation at break is much higher for the un-cross-linked precursor.
These observations are in agreement with the expectations, as such
changes in the tensile properties upon cross-linking are typical.[33] Furthermore, a similar relationship was established
in previous research on EPM-g-furan cross-linked with bismaleimides
via the DA route.[23]
Recyclability via Compression
Molding
As already shown,[29] the
anthracene dimer can be broken at a temperature
above 170 °C. We tried then to investigate whether these conditions
would result in a recyclable product (Figure ).
(a) Virgin sample (un-cross-linked), (b) cut
virgin sample (un-cross-linked),
(c) reprocessed sample (un-cross-linked), (d) UV-cross-linked sample,
(e) cut UV-cross-linked sample, and (f) reprocessed UV-cross-linked
sample.After grafting the EPM rubber
with anthracene moieties and subsequent
purification, several samples (bars) were made by compression molding
(Figure a).Freshly prepared virgin (un-cross-linked) EPM-g-AN could be successfully
processed into a bar (Figure a). Furthermore, after performing a tensile test and cutting
the un-cross-linked bar in small pieces, a reprocessed EPM-g-AN sample
was made (Figure c)
without noticeable defects to the naked eye. Cross-linking under UV
light did not visually affect the samples (Figure d). After tensile testing, the UV-cross-linked
bars were cut and the attempt of reprocessing failed, resulting in
a heterogeneous sample with air bubbles and a clear color change (Figure f). Tensile tests
on the reprocessed UV-cross-linked bars were not performed due to
these defects. Thus, the reprocessing of the UV-cross-linked EPM-g-AN
via simple annealing at high temperature (compression molding) was
deemed to be unsuccessful at the given conditions. Compression molding
at harder conditions (210 °C and 100 mPa for 20 min) did not
also give the desired results. It is suspected that due to the presence
of oxygen during compression molding, oxidative processes occur[34] leading to the degradation processes. Thus,
an additional experiment was designed, where the de-cross-linking
was performed in a flask under argon at 210 °C. However, also,
in this case, a change in the color of the polymer was observed, indicating
thermal degradation.[34] Furthermore, the
formation of yellow crystals on the top of the flask and other parts
of the equipment was observed. A UV–vis spectroscopy analysis
in tetrahydrofuran (THF) was employed to identify the yellow compound. Figure shows the characteristic
peaks (between 325 and 400 nm) of anthracene compounds,[35] indicating that the degradation product contains
anthracene functional groups.
Figure 4
UV–vis absorbance spectrum of the degradation
product.
UV–vis absorbance spectrum of the degradation
product.It is suspected that the yellow
compound is 9-anthracenemethanol,
hence to further identify the degradation product, 1H NMR
spectra in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 were recorded for 9-anthracenemethanol and the decomposition product.Both spectra were compared and all of the characteristic 9-anthracenemethanol
peaks (including the alcohol peak) were identified in the spectrum
of the degradation product (Figure ), indicating that 9-anthracenemethanol is present
in the degradation product. This proves that the degradation partially
occurs via the ester bond cleavage. Numerous unidentified peaks were
also observed, indicating other species in the degradation product.
Figure 5
1H NMR spectra of the degradation product (on top) and
9-anthracenemethanol (bottom).
1H NMR spectra of the degradation product (on top) and
9-anthracenemethanol (bottom).
Recyclability via Dissolution
The effects of cross-linking
and de-cross-linking have been demonstrated by testing the solubility
in decalin. This process has some advantages, compared to de-cross-linking
by simple annealing in the bulk. First, the solvent “protects”
the polymer from oxygen. It also affords to control the process duration
more precisely. Since the dissolving process is visible, it can be
stopped as soon as complete dissolution has been achieved within about
30 min. This affords to avoid unnecessary exposure to high temperatures,
which can cause degradation of the polymer backbone or functional
groups. Such control is obviously not possible when compression molding
is being applied. Lastly, decalin is a swelling solvent for cross-linked
EPM rubbers. This entails then the possibility for the network to
be strained in the presence of decalin, thus favoring the breakage
of the cross-linking points.A piece of the bar of un-cross-linked
EPM-g-AN easily and fully dissolved in decalin within 30 min at RT
(Figure a). However,
after 6 h of UV irradiation (365 nm) of the same EPM-g-AN bar, the
bar segment did not dissolve at all (full insolubility) under the
same conditions (Figure b). The difference in the solubility of the UV-irradiated (cross-linked)
and untreated (un-cross-linked) samples indicates effective cross-linking.[36] To examine the reversibility of the cross-links,
the same dispersion (insoluble sample) was heated up to 170 °C
for 30 min, resulting in a fully soluble mixture (Figure c). Thus, the de-cross-linking
proceeded effectively, indicating the reversible character of the
UV-cross-linked EPM-g-AN.[37]
Figure 6
Solubility test of EPM-g-AN.
Solubility test of EPM-g-AN.However, previous experiments and analysis suggest
that ester bond
cleavage and degradation occur at 210 °C, leading to the defunctionalization
of EPM-g-AN, which also could cause de-cross-linking of the polymer
network. Thus, an additional experiment was designed to examine if
the de-cross-linking and the resulting increase in solubility are
caused by the dissociation of anthracene dimers in EPM-g-AN or due
to the ester moiety cleavage. A piece of cross-linked rubber was heated
up to 170 °C in decalin. The obtained solution was reprecipitated
in a 10-fold amount of acetone and washed several times with acetone
to ensure the purity and the removal of possible impurities. UV–vis
spectroscopy clearly showed that the dissociation of anthracene moieties
dimers took place (Figure ).
Figure 7
UV absorbance spectra of de-cross-linked and cross-linked EPM-g-AN.
(a) Virgin EPM-g-AN rubber; (b) cross-linked EPM-g-AN; (c) heat-treated
EPM-g-AN after reprecipitation; and (d) re-cross-linked EPM-g-AN.
UV absorbance spectra of de-cross-linked and cross-linked EPM-g-AN.
(a) Virgin EPM-g-AN rubber; (b) cross-linked EPM-g-AN; (c) heat-treated
EPM-g-AN after reprecipitation; and (d) re-cross-linked EPM-g-AN.The presence of the characteristic peaks in anthracene-functionalized
compounds indicates that the cleavage of the ester bond did not occur
or only occurred partially at 170 °C in decalin (Figure ).To confirm the reversibility
of the UV-cross-links one more time,
the de-cross-linked film was irradiated with UV lamp (365 nm) for
40 min. The disappearance of anthracene peaks confirms effective cross-linking
(Figure ). To reiterate,
the polymer was then de-cross-linked in decalin; the presence of anthracene
groups was confirmed by UV–vis spectroscopy (film on a quartz
substrate), and the cross-linking was again successfully achieved
by UV irradiation of the film. Thus, EPM-g-AN can be at least partially
reprocessed by de-cross-linking in decalin; however, it is still possible
that some defunctionalization occurred.The de-cross-linking
process carried out in decalin and consequent
compression molding might be an alternative to the direct compression
molding of the UV-cross-linked material. If de-cross-linking in decalin
does result in some losses of anthracene functionality, without significant
degradation of the polymer backbone, such a method could be used to
recover EPM-g-AN. We then proceeded by comparing the recycled rubber
to the virgin counterpart in terms of mechanical properties (Figure ).
Figure 8
Recycling of the UV-cross-linked
EPM rubber.
Recycling of the UV-cross-linked
EPM rubber.After first recycling, we observed
a decrease in both tensile strength
and elongation at break, which did not cause a change in modulus.
Second recycling significantly results in decreased values of tensile
strength, while a third one just sets the trend further. Elongation
at break values is generally more constant. After dropping in the
first recycling step, they remain roughly constant for the next two
cycles.Obviously, we can observe the recycling possibilities
but not with
high efficiency. This might be due to other reasons such as degradation
of weak ester moiety and sequent irreversible cross-linking at the
active center and main hydrocarbon polymer chain free-radical irreversible
cross-linking processes. Additionally, the oxidation reaction of anthracene
under irradiation with the formation of peroxides is also a possibility.[38] This might result in irreversible bonds between
the chains and in the beginning in simple chain extension (increase
in molecular weight) due to the relatively low amount of anthracene
groups along the backbone. Further thermal cycling might then indeed
result in cross-linking, and this might be responsible for the deterioration
of mechanical behavior. As such, it is fair to say that the observed
result merely, although clearly, indicates the possibility for recycling,
while additional work should be carried out to fully clarify the chemical
reactions that might take place.
Conclusions
In
the present work, the possibility to recycle an EPM rubber containing
anthracene pending groups has been investigated. Such a rubber was
prepared by the reaction of commercially available materials: EPM-g-MA
(Keltan 1519R) and 9-anthracenemethanol. The reaction in the melt
showed 100% conversion of maleic anhydride groups along the polymer
backbone.After cross-linking, simple attempts at recycling
the material
via heating at high temperatures clearly failed as spectroscopic pieces
of evidence, among others, showed the occurrence of a side reaction,
namely, the ester breakage with the detachment of the anthracene moieties
from the polymer backbone. On the other hand, the use of decalin in
the de-cross-linking reaction, first as a swelling agent and later
as a solvent for the de-cross-linked rubber, allows recovery of an
un-cross-linked rubber sample showing good retention of the mechanical
properties upon a second cross-linking reaction. However, upon subsequent
de-cross-linking and cross-linking cycles, the mechanical behavior
deteriorates very rapidly, thus suggesting once more the presence
of chemical degradation mechanisms.On a more general level,
the observed results clearly indicate
the possibility of the use of anthracene moieties along a polymeric
backbone for UV-cross-linking. The possibility of recycling is also
clearly shown even if with the help of a swelling agent. This research
paves the way toward the use of these functional groups for reversible
cross-linking while highlighting that a more robust chemical linkage
(for example, amide instead of ester) is actually needed to anchor
the anthracene to the polymer backbone. This is the subject of a current
project in our research group.
Experimental Section
Materials
The
EPM-g-MA (2.1 wt % of the anhydride groups)
rubber was kindly supplied by Arlanxeo (Keltan 1519R) and dried for
30 min at 175 °C, 10 mmHg, before each experiment. 9-Anthracenemethanol
was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without purification. Solvents,
acetone, chloroform, and decalin, were purchased from Acros-Organics
and used without purification.
Functionalization of EPM-g-MA
with 9-Anthracenemethanol
Eighteen grams of EPM-g-MA (3.9
mmol of MA) was mixed in Brabender
at 170 °C and 50 rpm for 4 min under a nitrogen atmosphere. Consequently,
1.61 g of 9-anthracenemethanol (7.7 mmol, 2.0 molar equivalent based
on the amount of MA in EPM-g-MA) was added to EPM-g-MA in the Brabender
and mixed for an additional 4 min under the conditions specified above.
The obtained product was dissolved in 100 mL of chloroform and reprecipitated
in 10-fold excess acetone. Yellow fibers were collected by filtration
and dried overnight in a vacuum (10 mmHg) at 60 °C. The yield
was 16.95 (90%).Elemental analysis: calcd %C 84.94; %H 13.77Found: %C 84.91; %H 13.61
UV-Cross-Linking of EPM-g-AN Rubber
Samples (for both
tensile strength test 35 × 3 mm2 and films 10 ×
10 mm2) were exposed to a UV lamp (8W, Spectroline ENB-280C/FE)
with a wavelength 365 nm for 3 h on each side (2.4 cm distance from
the light source, only for dog-bond bars, films were irradiated on
one side at the same distance).
Solubility Test of EPM-g-AN
Un-cross-linked (soluble)
and UV-cross-linked (insoluble) EPM-g-AN were put in decalin to dissolve
at room temperature. After overnight stirring at ambient temperature,
the insoluble cross-linked sample was heated up to 170 °C for
30 min, yielding a clear solution. The un-cross-linked sample yielded
a clear solution within 2–3 h at ambient temperature. Then,
the de-cross-linked rubber solution in decalin was reprecipitated
in ∼10-fold excess of acetone and washed several times with
acetone to ensure purity.
Recycling of Cross-Linked EPM-g-AN Rubber
Cross-linked
samples after tensile testing were cut into 2 × 2 mm2 pieces and placed in decalin (sufficient volume to obtain 10 wt
% solution of the polymer). The mixture was heated up and stirred
until a clear solution was formed (∼30 min). De-cross-linked
rubber was isolated by reprecipitation in 10-fold excess of acetone
and dried at 60 °C, 10 mmHg overnight. The new samples were obtained
by compression molding at 130 °C, 50 MPa for 30 min.
Measurements
Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis)
absorbance spectra of thin films on quartz substrates and polymeric
chloroform and tetrahydrofuran solutions in quartz cuvettes were recorded
on a Helios Aquamate spectrometer (ThermoSpectronic, England) in the
range of 200–450 nm at a scan speed of 600 nm/min and room
temperature. The data were processed with VISIONlite Scan software. 1H NMR spectra for the decomposition product of the UV-cross-linked
polymer were recorded on Varian Mercury Plus 400 MHz in DMSO-d6. To determine the conversion of the functionalization
of EPM-g-MA rubber, after purification and drying, the elemental analysis
(EA) of C and H was performed with an Euro EA elemental analyzer.
Tensile tests were carried out using an Instron 5565 apparatus. A
strain rate of 500 mm/min was selected. For both sets of samples,
five samples were tested. The data were processed in Tinius Olsen
Horizon software. In calculations for averages, an outlier was excluded.
Authors: Kailong Jin; Aditya Banerji; David Kitto; Frank S Bates; Christopher J Ellison Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Lorenzo Massimo Polgar; Erik Hagting; Wouter-Jan Koek; Francesco Picchioni; Martin Van Duin Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2017-02-25 Impact factor: 4.329