| Literature DB >> 33282918 |
Jian Wang1, Yue Zhou1, Qingjie Wang1, Bowen Du1, Yurong Wu1, Qian Chen2, Xi Zhang3, Yanan Lu1, Sun Chen1, Kun Sun1.
Abstract
Background: Assessing right ventricular overload in children is challenging. We conducted this study involving children with pulmonary valvular stenosis (PS) or pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) to evaluate the potential of a new endogenous ligand of apelin receptor, Elabela (ELA), as a potential biomarker for right heart overload.Entities:
Keywords: Elabela; percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty; pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum; pulmonary valvular stenosis; right ventricular afterload
Year: 2020 PMID: 33282918 PMCID: PMC7688667 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.581848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1The flow chart of this prospective cohort study. AS, aortic stenosis; ASD, atrial septal defect; CHD, congenital heart disease; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; PS, pulmonary valvular stenosis; PA/IVS, pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum; RVOTO, right ventricle outflow tract obstruction; SV, single ventricle; VSD, ventricular septal defect.
Basic and echocardiographic characteristics of different groups including all subjects.
| Age (months) | 18.00 ± 6.9 | 11.45 ± 14.7 | 7.6 ± 16.2 | 0.29 ± 0.5 | 0.175 |
| Sex (M/F) | 2/2 | 14/6 | 9/11 | 6/1 | 0.185 |
| SBP (mmHg) | |||||
| DBP (mmHg) | |||||
| Weight (kg) | |||||
| Pro-BNP | |||||
| LOS (d) | 15.25 ± 6.7 | 7.47 ± 4.5 | 10.93 ± 5.4 | 12 ± 4.7 | 0.244 |
| Parity ≥2 (%) | |||||
| Abortion ≥1 (%) | |||||
| Re-operation (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (10.0) | 2 (10.0) | 3 (42.9) | 0.088 |
| TVG (mmHg) | |||||
| TV | |||||
| TV/MV | |||||
| PV | 0.161 | ||||
| PV/AV | 0.86 (0.8, 1.1) | 0.78 (0.6, 0.9) | 0.74 (0.7, 0.8) | 0.6 (0.6, 0.7) | 0.094 |
| RV/LV width ratio | |||||
| RV/LV length ratio | |||||
| Duct dependence (%) | |||||
| ELA (ng/mL) | |||||
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).
M, male; F, female; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BSA, body surface area; LOS, length of stay; TVG, transvalvular pulmonary gradient; TV, tricuspid valve; RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; PV, pulmonary valve; PV/AV, pulmonary valve/aortic valve; DA, ductus arteriosus. Group 1: patients with mild PS (TVG <40 mm Hg). Group 2: patients with moderate PS (TVG = 40–80 mm Hg). Group 3: patients with severe PS (TVG >80 mm Hg). Group 4: patients with PA/IVS. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD for normally distributed data or median with 25th and 75th quartiles for skewed data. Bold values were variables with P-value < 0.05.
One-way ANOVA tests.
Chi-square test.
Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 2Boxplot of plasma ELA levels of all groups and linear regression analysis between preoperative TVG and ELA concentrations. (A) Boxplot of plasma ELA levels (median; IQR) of all groups. (B) The linear regression analysis between TVG and ELA concentration. Mild PS: TVG < 40 mmHg; moderate PS: TVG = 40–80 mmHg; severe PS: TVG > 80 mmHg. *0.01 < p < 0.05; **0.001 < p < 0.01.
Figure 3Preoperative and postoperative transvalvular pulmonary gradients (TVG) and ELA concentrations. **0.001 < p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 4The hot spot of correlation coefficients of ELA and demographic and echocardiographic measurements.
Results of regression models assessing the independent variable of Elabela and its association with transvalvular pulmonary gradient (TVG) and conventional echocardiographic measurements.
| Model 1 | −1.44 | −2.08, −0.81 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | −1.01 | −1.72, −0.48 | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | −0.61 | −1.45, 0.24 | 0.151 |
| Model 1 | 0.008 | 0.005, 0.011 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.007 | 0.004, 0.011 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 0.008 | 0.004, 0.011 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.006 | 0.003, 0.009 | 0.001 |
Model 1 was only adjusted for the independent variable of ELA.
Model 2 was adjusted for some basic characteristics, including age, sex, weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pro-natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP).
Model 3 was adjusted for additional echocardiographic measurements of RV/LV width ratio and RV/LV length ratio, except for basic characteristics.
Sensitivity and specificity of receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve of ELA concentrations and right ventricle (RV)/left ventricle (LV) length ratio and width ratio as predictors of neonatal ductal dependence.
| Sensitivity | 63.2 | 11.1 | 38.4–83.7 |
| Specificity | 75.0 | 7.7 | 56.6–88.5 |
| PPV | 60.0 | 11.0 | 36.1–80.9 |
| NPV | 77.4 | 7.5 | 59.0–90.4 |
| Sensitivity | 66.7 | 12.2 | 38.4–88.2 |
| Specificity | 99.5 | 6.3 | 69.9–97.6 |
| PPV | 76.9 | 11.7 | 46.2–95.0 |
| NPV | 82.1 | 7.2 | 63.1–93.9 |
| Sensitivity | 57.1 | 13.2 | 28.9–82.3 |
| Specificity | 88.5 | 6.3 | 69.8–97.6 |
| PPV | 72.7 | 13.4 | 39.0–94.0 |
| NPV | 79.3 | 7.5 | 60.3–92.0 |
PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Figure 5Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve of ELA concentrations and right ventricle (RV)/left ventricle (LV) length ratio and width ratio as predictors of neonatal ductal dependence. Patients with ELA concentrations more than 10.698 ng/mL were more likely to be ductus-independent during the neonatal period.