Literature DB >> 33282523

Capability of physically reasonable OCT-based differentiation between intact brain tissues, human brain gliomas of different WHO grades, and glioma model 101.8 from rats.

I N Dolganova1,2, P V Aleksandrova1, P V Nikitin3,4, A I Alekseeva1,5, N V Chernomyrdin4, G R Musina4, S T Beshplav3,4, I V Reshetov6,7, A A Potapov3, V N Kurlov1,2, V V Tuchin8,9,10, K I Zaytsev2,4.   

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the ex vivo rat and human brain tissue samples is performed. The set of samples comprises intact white and gray matter, as well as human brain gliomas of the World Health Organization (WHO) Grades I-IV and glioma model 101.8 from rats. Analysis of OCT signals is aimed at comparing the physically reasonable properties of tissues, and determining the attenuation coefficient, parameter related to effective refractive index, and their standard deviations. Data analysis is based on the linear discriminant analysis and estimation of their dispersion in a four-dimensional principal component space. The results demonstrate the distinct contrast between intact tissues and low-grade gliomas and moderate contrast between intact tissues and high-grade gliomas. Particularly, the mean values of attenuation coefficient are 7.56±0.91, 3.96±0.98, and 5.71±1.49 mm-1 for human white matter, glioma Grade I, and glioblastoma, respectively. The significant variability of optical properties of high Grades and essential differences between rat and human brain tissues are observed. The dispersion of properties enlarges with increase of the glioma WHO Grade, which can be attributed to the growing heterogeneity of pathological brain tissues. The results of this study reveal the advantages and drawbacks of OCT for the intraoperative diagnosis of brain gliomas and compare its abilities separately for different grades of malignancy. The perspective of OCT to differentiate low-grade gliomas is highlighted by the low performance of the existing intraoperational methods and instruments.
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33282523      PMCID: PMC7687948          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.409692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  63 in total

1.  Analysis of optical coherence tomography systems based on the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle.

Authors:  L Thrane; H T Yura; P E Andersen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Imaging ex vivo healthy and pathological human brain tissue with ultra-high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kostadinka Bizheva; Angelika Unterhuber; Boris Hermann; Boris Povazay; Harald Sattmann; A F Fercher; Wolfgang Drexler; Matthias Preusser; Herbert Budka; Andreas Stingl; Tuan Le
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality.

Authors:  Wolfgang Drexler; Mengyang Liu; Abhishek Kumar; Tschackad Kamali; Angelika Unterhuber; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Hiding in the Shadows: CPOX Expression and 5-ALA Induced Fluorescence in Human Glioma Cells.

Authors:  Nikolay Pustogarov; Dmitriy Panteleev; Sergey A Goryaynov; Anastasia V Ryabova; Ekaterina Y Rybalkina; Alexander Revishchin; Alexander A Potapov; Galina Pavlova
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Optical measurement of the axial eye length by laser Doppler interferometry.

Authors:  C K Hitzenberger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Optical coefficients as tools for increasing the optical coherence tomography contrast for normal brain visualization and glioblastoma detection.

Authors:  Elena B Kiseleva; Konstantin S Yashin; Alexander A Moiseev; Lidia B Timofeeva; Vera V Kudelkina; Anna I Alekseeva; Svetlana V Meshkova; Anastasia V Polozova; Grigory V Gelikonov; Elena V Zagaynova; Natalia D Gladkova
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.593

7.  Imaging ex vivo and in vitro brain morphology in animal models with ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kostadinka Bizheva; Angelika Unterhuber; Boris Hermann; Boris Povazay; Harald Sattmann; Wolfgang Drexler; Andreas Stingl; Tuan Le; Michael Mei; Ronald Holzwarth; Herbert A Reitsamer; John E Morgan; Alan Cowey
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Terahertz reflectometry imaging for low and high grade gliomas.

Authors:  Young Bin Ji; Seung Jae Oh; Seok-Gu Kang; Jung Heo; Sang-Hoon Kim; Yuna Choi; Seungri Song; Hye Young Son; Se Hoon Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Seung Joo Haam; Yong Min Huh; Jong Hee Chang; Chulmin Joo; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intraoperative detection of blood vessels with an imaging needle during neurosurgery in humans.

Authors:  Hari Ramakonar; Bryden C Quirk; Rodney W Kirk; Jiawen Li; Angela Jacques; Christopher R P Lind; Robert A McLaughlin
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Feasibility evaluation of micro-optical coherence tomography (μOCT) for rapid brain tumor type and grade discriminations: μOCT images versus pathology.

Authors:  Xiaojun Yu; Chi Hu; Wenfei Zhang; Jie Zhou; Qianshan Ding; M T Sadiq; Zeming Fan; Zhaohui Yuan; Linbo Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  1 in total

1.  Single-cell all-optical coherence elastography with optical tweezers.

Authors:  Maxim A Sirotin; Maria N Romodina; Evgeny V Lyubin; Irina V Soboleva; Andrey A Fedyanin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.732

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.