Literature DB >> 33282325

Outcomes of presumed malignant glioma treated without pathological confirmation: a retrospective, single-center analysis.

Seth Andrew Climans1, Ronald Cepe Ramos1, Normand Laperriere1, Mark Bernstein2, Warren P Mason1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue diagnosis is essential in the usual management of high-grade glioma. In rare circumstances, due to patient preference, performance status, comorbidities, or tumor location, biopsy is not feasible. Sometimes a biopsy is nondiagnostic. Many neuro-oncology clinics have patients like this, but these patients' outcomes and responses to treatment are not known.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from adult patients diagnosed with presumed high-grade glioma of the brain without definitive pathology, diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. We recorded several clinical variables including date of first diagnostic imaging and date of death.
RESULTS: We identified 61 patients and subclassified them to brainstem glioma (n = 32), supratentorial presumed glioblastoma (n = 24), presumed thalamic diffuse midline glioma (n = 2), gliomatosis cerebri (n = 2), and cerebellar glioma (n = 1). Most brainstem glioma patients had no biopsy because of tumor location. Supratentorial presumed glioblastoma patients had no biopsy predominantly because of comorbidities. Median survival, from first diagnostic imaging, was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.9 to 6.3 months) in the supratentorial glioblastoma group and 18.5 months (95% CI: 13.0 to 44.1 months) in the brainstem group. Treatment with radiation or chemotherapy did not alter the median survival of the supratentorial glioblastoma group (hazard ratio 1.41, uncorrected P = .5).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with imaging diagnoses of high-grade glioma have similar, if not worse, survival than those with pathological confirmation. Based on these uncontrolled data, it is unclear how effective radiation or chemotherapy is in this population.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brainstem glioma; chemotherapy; diagnostic uncertainty; glioblastoma; radiation oncology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33282325      PMCID: PMC7690356          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  16 in total

1.  THE THERAPY OF UNBIOPSIED BRAIN TUMORS.

Authors:  G E SHELINE; T L PHILLIPS; E BOLDRE
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1965-03

2.  Radiation plus Temozolomide in Patients with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  James R Perry; Normand Laperriere; Warren P Mason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Gabrielle Truitt; Alexander Boscia; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Radiation therapy of brain-stem tumors.

Authors:  T R Whyte; M Y Colby; D D Layton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Low-grade gliomas in adults.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Susan Chang; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Brainstem gliomas in adults: prognostic factors and classification.

Authors:  J S Guillamo; A Monjour; L Taillandier; B Devaux; P Varlet; C Haie-Meder; G L Defer; P Maison; J J Mazeron; P Cornu; J Y Delattre
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic factors and results of therapy for adult thalamic and brainstem tumors.

Authors:  P W Grigsby; D M Garcia; J R Simpson; B B Fineberg; H G Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic factors in adult brainstem gliomas: a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 101 cases.

Authors:  Santosh Kesari; Ryung S Kim; Vassilios Markos; Jan Drappatz; Patrick Y Wen; Amy A Pruitt
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Focal brain lesions: effect of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopic findings on treatment decisions.

Authors:  A J Adamson; S D Rand; R W Prost; T A Kim; C Schultz; V M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Real-world validity of randomized controlled phase III trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?

Authors:  Erlend Skaga; Marthe Andrea Skretteberg; Tom Børge Johannesen; Petter Brandal; Einar O Vik-Mo; Eirik Helseth; Iver A Langmoen
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-02-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.