| Literature DB >> 33282291 |
Simon H Apte1,2, Gabriela Minigo3,4, Penny L Groves1, Jessie C Spargo3,4, Magdalena Plebanski5,6, Mathew J Grigg3,4, Enny Kenangalem7, Julie G Burel1,8, Jessica R Loughland1,3,4, Katie L Flanagan5,6,9, Kim A Piera3,4, Timothy William9, Ric N Price3,10,11, Tonia Woodberry3,4, Bridget E Barber1,3,4, Nicholas M Anstey3, Denise L Doolan1,12.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: CD4+ T cells are critical mediators of immunity to Plasmodium spp. infection, but their characteristics during malarial episodes and immunopathology in naturally infected adults are poorly defined. Flow cytometric analysis of PBMCs from patients with either P. falciparum or P. knowlesi malaria revealed a pronounced population of CD4+ T cells co-expressing very high levels of CD4 and CD38 we have termed CD4hiCD38hi T cells. We set out to gain insight into the function of these novel cells.Entities:
Keywords: CD38; CD4 co‐receptor modulation; CD4+ T cells; malaria; regulatory T cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 33282291 PMCID: PMC7684974 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Immunology ISSN: 2050-0068
Study participants (excluding those in Figure 1c)
|
P. falciparum malaria (Sabah) |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number, | 16 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Age, years [median (IQR)] | 30 (19–50) | 28 (21–50) | 28 (26–32) | 46 (42–46) |
| Males, | 10 (63%) | 6 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (100%) |
| Parasitaemia (parasites µL−1) [median (IQR)] | 9663 (3452–38472) | BDL | 10580 (5037–127760) | 377 (120–2149) |
| HRP2 (ng mL−1) | 126 (28–183) | BDL | 588 (318–1020) | NA |
|
Haemoglobin (g dL−1) [median (IQR)] | 13.2 (11.5–14.6) | 13.5 (12.2–14.1) | 10.8 (8.2–11.7) | 13.5 (12.9–15.2) |
| Ang‐2 (pg mL−1) [median (IQR)] | 3086 (1847–7195) | 1355 (584–1812) | 3554 (2022–6891) | 4006 (3231–5841) |
All values are median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated.
BDL, below detection limit; NA, data not available.
Samples below detection limit were assigned the value of half the detection limit (0.03 pg mL−1).
Figure 1CD4hiCD38hi T cells arise during acute malaria. (a) Flow cytometric assessment of CD4 and CD38 co‐expression on CD4+ T cells in PBMCs of patients with either P. falciparum or P. knowlesi malaria. Top panels show analysis of samples collected on initial presentation to clinic (acute day 0), and lower panels show matched patient samples collected after drug treatment and convalescence (conv’ day 28). The percentage of CD4+ T cells that are CD4hiCD38hi are shown. (b) Representative gating strategy used to identify CD4hiCD38hi T cells. (c) PBMCs collected from Plasmodium‐negative healthy controls (HC; n = 7), Plasmodium‐positive, asymptomatic individuals (AS; n = 6) and patients with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria (UM; n = 20) or severe P. falciparum malaria (SM; n = 11) were analysed by flow cytometry for cell surface marker expression. CD4hiCD38hi cells are shown as the percentage of total CD4+ T cells. Box plots show the minimum, maximum, median and interquartile range for data from all participants. Horizontal lines depict the median with interquartile range. Data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post‐tests comparing each group with HC.
Study participants in Figure 1c
| Healthy controls (HC) | Asymptomatic malaria (AS) | Uncomplicated malaria (UM) | Severe malaria (SM) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number, | 7 | 6 | 20 | 11 | |
| Age, years [median (IQR)] | 30 (25–35) | 21 (18–25) | 33 (25–41) | 25 (23–36) | 0.0208 |
| Males, number (%) | 6 (86) | 6 (100) | 13 (65) | 7 (64) | |
|
Parasitaemia (parasites µL−1) [median (IQR)] | 0 (0–0) | 85 (62–6956) | 2048 (374–7113) | 176 758 (91 786–508 775) | < 0.0001 |
| HRP2 (ng mL−1) | 0.03 (0.03–0.03) | 0.3 (0.3–3.1) | 34 (0.3–109.6) | 5691 (3651–12 247) | 0.0003 |
|
Haemoglobin (g dL−1) | 12 (11–16) | 11 (9.5–13.25) | 11 (10–12.75) | 9 (8–12) | 0.1142 |
|
Angiopoietin‐2 (pg mL−1) [median (IQR)] | 2511 (1940–3465) | 3255 (2666–4698) | 3181 (2144–3911) | 25 025 (5300–42 177) | < 0.0001 |
All values are median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated.
Kruskal–Wallis test.
Samples below the detection limit were assigned the value of half the detection limit (0.03 pg mL−1).
Figure 2Increased CD4 expression in CD4hiCD38hi cells is modulated at the mRNA level. (a) Experimental plan for cell sorting, stimulation and gene expression analysis. (b) Gene expression assessment by qPCR of FACS‐sorted CD4norm (norm) and CD4hiCD38hi (high) T cells from patients with acute P. falciparum malaria (n = 6, log2‐normalised data, paired t‐test). (c) P. falciparum antigen‐specific responses measured in FACS‐sorted CD4norm (blue squares) and CD4hiCD38hi (red circles) T cells from patients with acute P. falciparum malaria (Pf inf’) or healthy Sabah controls (HC) by qPCR after 24‐h co‐incubation with extract made with P. falciparum‐infected RBC (pRBC) or normal RBC (nRBC) (n = 3 Pf inf’ and n = 3 HC, log2‐normalised data, paired t‐test).
Figure 3Differential gene expression in CD4hiCD38hi T cells. Differential expression of 130 genes associated with T‐cell function was assessed by NanoString in FACS‐sorted CD4norm and CD4hiCD38hi T cells from patients attending a clinic with acute P. falciparum malaria (Sabah (n = 6) and Papua (n = 6)) or P. knowlesi malaria (Sabah (n = 6)). (a) Differences in fold changes in gene expression from CD4norm to CD4hiCD38hi T cells were analysed by principal component analysis (PCA) comparing cells from patients with P. falciparum and P. knowlesi malaria (left panel), and histogram of false discovery rate (FDR) was assessed by ANOVA (right panel). (b) PCA comparing gene expression in CD4norm and CD4hiCD38hi T cells for combined P. falciparum and P. knowlesi samples and histogram of FDR from a paired t‐test (n = 18). (c) Heatmap of 78 genes reproducibly detected across all samples, showing 49 genes with a FDR < 0.05 in the upper panel (as in 3b above) and the remainder in the lower panel. (d) Linear discriminant effect size analysis (LEfSe) using fold changes in gene expression from CD4norm to CD4hiCD38hi T cells for all 78 detected genes. (e) Random Forest analysis performed on the same data set (truncated at importance value 3).
Figure 4Ontogeny of CD4hiCD38hi T cells. (a) Predicted upstream regulators of the CD4hiCD38hi cell type identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of fold changes in gene expression from CD4norm to CD4hiCD38hi T cells for the 49 genes identified above with a FDR < 0.05 (truncated at Z‐score = 2); and (b) plot of predicted relationships (IPA). (c) Representative FACS plots from one volunteer and (d) differential expression of CD4 and CD38 on CD4+ T cells assessed by FACS in PBMCs from healthy volunteers (Brisbane) cultured for 2 weeks with pRBC extract in media containing IL‐2 (media) or IL‐2 supplemented with IL‐27 (+IL‐27) (n = 4, paired t‐test). (e) Gene expression assessment by qPCR of FACS‐sorted CD4+ T cells from PBMCs cultured as above (n = 4, log2‐normalised data, paired t‐test).
Figure 5Identification of CD4hi cells in the mouse. (a) Kinetic analysis of CD4 and IFN‐γ expression by FACS in CD4+ T cells in the spleens of mice (GREAT IFN‐γ reporter mice) infected with P. yoelii 17XNL. The percentage of CD4+ T cells that are CD4hi and IFN‐γhi are shown (n = 3 mice at each timepoint, concatenated FACS data shown). (b) Kinetic analysis of the frequency of CD4hi and IFN‐γhi in the spleen (n = 3 mice at each timepoint, one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). (c) IFN‐γ and IL‐10 levels were assessed by cytokine bead array in the plasma of C57BL/6 mice infected with P. yoelii 17XNL at the timepoints indicated. Left axis indicates IFN‐γ and right axis IL‐10 (n = 10, mean and SEM shown). (d) Parasitaemia in GREAT IFN‐γ reporter mice following the infection with P. yoelii 17XNL (n = 3, mean and SEM shown). (e) Analysis of CD4 and IFN‐γ expression by FACS on day 11 of infection with P. yoelii 17XNL in CD4+ T cells in the organs indicated in GREAT IFN‐ reporter mice. The percentage of CD4+ T cells that are CD4 and IFN‐γ positive are shown (DLN = draining lymph node, Ing LN = inguinal lymph node). (f) FACS analysis of CD38 expression in CD4hiIFN‐γhi cells in GREAT IFN‐γ reporter mice on day 11 of P. yoelii 17XNL infection. (g) CD4hiIFN‐γhi cells (gated as in e above) were FACS‐sorted from the spleens of GREAT IFN‐γ reporter mice on day 11 of infection with P. yoelii 17XNL, and gene expression was assessed by qPCR (n = 3, log2‐normalised data, paired t‐test, mean with SD shown). Data shown are from three independent experiments.