Literature DB >> 33282134

A randomized split-mouth clinical trial comparing pain experienced during palatal injections with two different computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery systems.

Anna Riba-Roca1, Rui Figueiredo2, Stanley F Malamed3, Josep Arnabat-Dominguez4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been proposed to reduce pain during injection. The main aim to this study was to compare the pain perception in patients receiving palatal injections of local anesthesia using two different computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery systems (C-CLAD) - Dentapen® and The STA Wand®).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, split-mouth and simple blind clinical trial was carried out at the Dental Hospital of the University of Barcelona (Spain) involving a sample of 20 healthy volunteers. Each participant received two palatal injections in the same session (0.3 ml of 3% mepivacaine without vasoconstrictor), using The STA Wand® on one side and the Dentapen® on the contralateral side. The order of the devices and the side of the injections were randomly selected. Pain perception was recorded after each injection using a 10-cm numeric rating scale (NRS). A descriptive and bivariate analysis of the data was performed.
RESULTS: Pain perception was similar with both devices (p>0.05). The STA Wand® and Dentapen® groups yielded a mean pain score of 2.40 cm (standard deviation (SD) = 1.47, range 0-6) and 2.35 cm (SD 1.3, range 1-6), respectively. Most participants referred mild pain (80%), and none experienced severe pain. There were no adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of cases (80%), both C-CLAD devices allow the administration of local anesthetics in the palatal area with mild pain. Both The STA Wand® and Dentapen® are equally effective in reducing pain perception levels for palatal injections. Key words:Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery, dental anesthesia; palatal anesthesia, The STA Wand, Dentapen. Copyright:
© 2020 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33282134      PMCID: PMC7700779          DOI: 10.4317/jced.57506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  19 in total

1.  A comparative study of children's pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections.

Authors:  May Feda; Najlaa Al Amoudi; Aly Sharaf; Azza Hanno; Najat Farsi; Ibrahim Masoud; Abdullah Almushyt
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.065

2.  Comparison of the pain levels of computer controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in supraperiosteal injections: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Smita Singh; Aniket Garg
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique.

Authors:  J F Tahmassebi; M Nikolaou; M S Duggal
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-06

4.  Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.

Authors:  Keith D Allen; Darin Kotil; Robert E Larzelere; Susan Hutfless; Soraya Beiraghi
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

5.  An emphasis on the wide usage and important role of local anesthesia in dentistry: A strategic review.

Authors:  Preetinder Singh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery for painless anesthesia: a literature review.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kwak; Nan-Sim Pang; Jin-Hyung Cho; Bock-Young Jung; Kee-Deog Kim; Wonse Park
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System.

Authors:  Annelyse Garret-Bernardin; Tiziana Cantile; Vincenzo D'Antò; Alexandros Galanakis; Gabriel Fauxpoint; Gianmaria Fabrizio Ferrazzano; Sara De Rosa; Giulia Vallogini; Umberto Romeo; Angela Galeotti
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Pain Perception Due to Dental Injection by Smartject: Split Mouth Design Study.

Authors:  Faezeh Ghaderi; Mahboobe Ahmadbeigi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2018-03

9.  Comparison of anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized local anesthesia delivery systems for different stages of anesthesia delivery in maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks.

Authors:  Kamal Aggarwal; Arundeep Kaur Lamba; Farrukh Faraz; Shruti Tandon; Kanika Makker
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-12-28

10.  Influence of information concerning a computerized anesthesia system on dental anxiety: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  A Rizzo-Lorenzo; A Sánchez-Torres; C Noguera-Mutlló; I Pérez-Beltrán; R Figueiredo; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.