Karla-Janilee-de Souza Penha1, Carlos-Rocha-Gomes Torres2, Rudys-Rodolfo-De Jesus Tavarez3, Leily-Macedo Firoozmand4. 1. DDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. 2. DDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos (UNESP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. 3. DDS, MSc, PhD, Professor, Department of Post-Graduation Ceuma University (UNICEUMA), São Luis Maranhão, Brazil. 4. DDS, MSc, PhD, Professor, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of the association of the universal adhesive system to different energy densities of the Nd:YAG laser on the hydraulic conductance of dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty bovine dentin discs were made. The samples were stratified into four groups (n = 10) according to the treatment performed; SBU- Adper Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), SBU_60 - SBU associated with the Nd:YAG laser (60mJ, 10Hz, 0.6W - 47.77 J / cm²), SBU_80 - SBU associated with the Nd:YAG laser (80mJ, 10Hz, 0.8 W - 63.69 J / cm2) and C - dentin without treatment (smear layer). Hydraulic conductance measurements were taken 24 hours after the treatments (HC1) and after erosive challenge (HC2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) helped to visualize the dentin after the different treatments. Scheffe and Games-Howell statistical tests were used to analyze hydraulic conductance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The treated dentin (SBU, SBU_60, and SBU_80) reduced HC1 when compared to dentin with smear layer (C) (p< 0.001). The erosive challenge has increased HC2 in SBU_60 and C (p< 0.001), and did not promote a significant difference in SBU_80 and SBU. The SEM / EDX analyzes showed an irregular and semi-permeable barrier on the surfaces of the treated dentin. CONCLUSIONS: The association of universal adhesive with Nd:YAG can be an effective alternative for the occlusion of dentinal tubules, whereas higher energy per pulse Nd:YAG (SBU_80) can increase the resistance to permeability when exposed to the erosive challenge. Key words:Dentin, permeability of dentin, Nd:YAG Laser, adhesives. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of the association of the universal adhesive system to different energy densities of the Nd:YAG laser on the hydraulic conductance of dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty bovine dentin discs were made. The samples were stratified into four groups (n = 10) according to the treatment performed; SBU- Adper Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), SBU_60 - SBU associated with the Nd:YAG laser (60mJ, 10Hz, 0.6W - 47.77 J / cm²), SBU_80 - SBU associated with the Nd:YAG laser (80mJ, 10Hz, 0.8 W - 63.69 J / cm2) and C - dentin without treatment (smear layer). Hydraulic conductance measurements were taken 24 hours after the treatments (HC1) and after erosive challenge (HC2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) helped to visualize the dentin after the different treatments. Scheffe and Games-Howell statistical tests were used to analyze hydraulic conductance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The treated dentin (SBU, SBU_60, and SBU_80) reduced HC1 when compared to dentin with smear layer (C) (p< 0.001). The erosive challenge has increased HC2 in SBU_60 and C (p< 0.001), and did not promote a significant difference in SBU_80 and SBU. The SEM / EDX analyzes showed an irregular and semi-permeable barrier on the surfaces of the treated dentin. CONCLUSIONS: The association of universal adhesive with Nd:YAG can be an effective alternative for the occlusion of dentinal tubules, whereas higher energy per pulse Nd:YAG (SBU_80) can increase the resistance to permeability when exposed to the erosive challenge. Key words:Dentin, permeability of dentin, Nd:YAG Laser, adhesives. Copyright:
Authors: A K Marimoto; L A Cunha; K C K Yui; M F R L Huhtala; D C Barcellos; A Prakki; S E P Gonçalves Journal: Oper Dent Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 2.440