BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) remains a prime contributor to poor influenza vaccine uptake. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes and practices of community pharmacists toward influenza VH, including their personal influenza immunization attitudes and behaviours. METHODS: A web-based cross-sectional survey questionnaire was administered to community pharmacists practising in Ontario, Canada. A 38-question survey tool explored 5 domains, including pharmacists' personal attitudes and behaviour toward influenza immunization, their self-reported knowledge of influenza, its vaccine and vaccine hesitancy, and their attitudes, practices and experiences with influenza VH at the community pharmacy. The data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 5530 survey invitations were e-mailed, and 885 responses were collected (response rate 16%). Two-thirds (n = 568, 65.7%) of the respondents reported receiving the influenza vaccine in the preceding season. The most frequent reasons for personal influenza immunization were prevention of disease transmission to patients, friends and family, and contribution to herd immunity. In addition to their confidence and perceived ability to identify and address influenza VH, respondents' self-reported knowledge across a 15-item Likert questionnaire was high. Respondents reported coming across an average of 16 (SD 28) individuals hesitant to receive the influenza vaccine each week. Regular workload (n = 419, 65.6%) and insufficient time (n = 406, 65.3%) were reported as the most limiting barriers to engagement in influenza vaccine conversations. CONCLUSION: Facilitating optimal practice scope for pharmacists, and capitalizing on the convenience and accessibility of the community pharmacy setting, presents a promising means to address influenza VH. However, barriers to pharmacist-initiated engagement on influenza vaccine must be explored and addressed. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.
BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) remains a prime contributor to poor influenza vaccine uptake. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes and practices of community pharmacists toward influenza VH, including their personal influenza immunization attitudes and behaviours. METHODS: A web-based cross-sectional survey questionnaire was administered to community pharmacists practising in Ontario, Canada. A 38-question survey tool explored 5 domains, including pharmacists' personal attitudes and behaviour toward influenza immunization, their self-reported knowledge of influenza, its vaccine and vaccine hesitancy, and their attitudes, practices and experiences with influenza VH at the community pharmacy. The data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 5530 survey invitations were e-mailed, and 885 responses were collected (response rate 16%). Two-thirds (n = 568, 65.7%) of the respondents reported receiving the influenza vaccine in the preceding season. The most frequent reasons for personal influenza immunization were prevention of disease transmission to patients, friends and family, and contribution to herd immunity. In addition to their confidence and perceived ability to identify and address influenza VH, respondents' self-reported knowledge across a 15-item Likert questionnaire was high. Respondents reported coming across an average of 16 (SD 28) individuals hesitant to receive the influenza vaccine each week. Regular workload (n = 419, 65.6%) and insufficient time (n = 406, 65.3%) were reported as the most limiting barriers to engagement in influenza vaccine conversations. CONCLUSION: Facilitating optimal practice scope for pharmacists, and capitalizing on the convenience and accessibility of the community pharmacy setting, presents a promising means to address influenza VH. However, barriers to pharmacist-initiated engagement on influenza vaccine must be explored and addressed. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.
Authors: Kimberly Corace; Chatura Prematunge; Anne McCarthy; Rama C Nair; Virginia Roth; Thomas Hayes; Kathryn N Suh; Louise Balfour; Gary Garber Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Patricia Doyle; Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof; Dana S Edge; Liane Ginsburg; David H Goldstein Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 7.035