Literature DB >> 33281965

Circulating exosomal miR-125a-5p as a novel biomarker for cervical cancer.

Aixia Lv1, Zengrong Tu2, Yunhua Huang3, Weiying Lu3,4, Baoguo Xie4.   

Abstract

Exosomal microRNAs (miRs/miRNAs) have been reported to be associated with cervical cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate circulating exosomal miRNA as a biomarker for cervical cancer diagnosis. In the present study, samples from 6 patients with cervical cancer and 6 healthy control subjects were retrieved for exosomal RNA-sequencing. The results revealed that a total of 39 miRNAs were differentially expressed between patients with cervical cancer and healthy controls (P<0.001; fold-change >2.0). Exosomal miR-125a-5p was further quantified in plasma from 60 subjects, which included 22 healthy individuals and 38 patients with cervical cancer. miR-16a-5p served as the reference miRNA for quantitative PCR analysis of exosomal miR-125a-5p in patients with cervical cancer and healthy individuals. The results revealed that exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels in the patients with cervical cancer were significantly lower than those in the healthy controls (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed and the results revealed that the level of plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p was a potential marker for differentiating between non-cervical cancer and cervical cancer, with an ROC area under the curve of 0.7129. At the cut-off value of 2.537 for miR-125a-5p, cervical cancer diagnostic sensitivities and specificities were 59.1 and 84.2%, respectively. The present study provides confirmation that exosomal miR-125a-5p could potentially serve as a biomarker for cervical cancer diagnosis. The present study involved only a small number of clinical samples; more samples are required to support the conclusions of the present study. Copyright: © Lv et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; diagnostic marker; exosomes; microRNA-125a-5p

Year:  2020        PMID: 33281965      PMCID: PMC7709555          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

It is estimated that there were ~570,000 cases of cervical cancer and 311,000 deaths worldwide in 2018, making it the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of female cancer-associated mortality (1). There are no symptoms typically seen in the early stages of disease; therefore, novel biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for early detection and diagnosis are urgently required to ensure patients can receive timely treatment. Liquid biopsies, which include circulating tumor (ct)DNA, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), platelets and exosomes, are promising for early cancer detection and real time monitoring of cancer progression, response to treatment and cancer metastasis (2). Compared with CTCs and ctDNA, exosomes are advantageous in terms of stability, abundance and accessibility; exosomes are abundant in plasma and are broadly distributed in body fluids, and can be easily acquired (3). Exosomes are nano-sized and membrane-enclosed extracellular vesicles with a diameter of 30–150 nm (4). Almost all mammalian cells, including dendritic cells, adipocytes, endothelial and epithelial cells, can secrete exosomes under normal or pathological conditions (5). Exosomes carry numerous types of biological molecules, including proteins, RNAs, DNAs and lipids. Previous studies have indicated that miRNA is stably present in the exosomes, suggesting that exosomal miRNAs could be investigated as biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment in cancer (6). In patients with cervical cancer, homosapiens (hsa)-microRNA (miR/miRNA)-21 and hsa-miR-164a have been reported to be upregulated and associated with the high levels of cervical cancer-derived exosomes (7). It has also been reported that long non-coding RNAs HOTAIR, MALAT1 and MEG3 in exosomes can be isolated from cervicovaginal lavage and are differentially expressed in patients with cervical cancer and control patients (8). miR-125a-5p was previously identified in normal tissue and exhibited a decreased expression in breast cancer (9). Additionally, upregulation of miR-125a-5p induced cancer cell apoptosis through p53 activation (10). In hepatocellular carcinoma, inhibiting miR-125a-5p increases MMP11 and vascular endothelial growth factor A protein expression, while restoring miR-125a-5p can inhibit cancer cell proliferation and metastasis (11). Circulating plasma exosomal miR-125a-3p is accessible as a diagnostic biomarker for early-stage colon cancer, which can also improve diagnostic power when combined with the serum serological tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (12). The aim of the present study was to determine whether cervical cancer exosomes contain low levels of miR-125a-5p by using a larger number of samples, and to evaluate whether exosomal miR-125a-5p can potentially serve as a biomarker for cervical cancer diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Patients and samples

A total of 72 individuals, including 44 patients with cervical cancer (age range, 42–65 years; median age, 56 years) and 28 healthy controls (age range, 41–69 years; median age, 58 years), were recruited between July 2017 and November 2018 from the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan University (Haikou, Hainan), the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army (Lanzhou, Gansu) and the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (Taiyuan, Shanxi). The clinical characteristics of the patients with cervical cancer were obtained through the hospital medical systems, including age, histological type, tumor size, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (13), metastasis and HPV status. All cases of cervical cancer were confirmed by pathological diagnosis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: Other types of cancer besides cervical cancer, anemia, active infections, liver or kidney dysfunction, mental or psychological diseases, autoimmune disease and severe heart failure. Firstly, 12 samples were used for the exosomal small RNA sequencing, which included 6 patients with cervical cancer and 6 healthy control subjects. Next, the remaining 60 subjects, which included 22 healthy individuals and 38 patients with cervical cancer, were investigated using quantitative PCR (qPCR) to confirm the differential exosomal miRNAs. Whole blood (10 ml) was collected by venipuncture into EDTA tubes (Guangzhou Improve Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.), centrifuged at 800 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and the isolated plasma samples were stored at −80°C until RNA isolation.

Exosomal RNA extraction and sequencing library preparation

Exosomes were isolated using the exoEasy Maxi kit (cat. no. 76064; Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was extracted from plasma using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit (cat. no. 77064; Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol and information on the label. Extracted exosomal RNA was used to prepare miRNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) libraries with the QIAseq miRNA Library kit (cat. no. 331505; Qiagen, Inc.). The sequencing was performed by HaploX Biotechnology Co., Ltd. on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument. NGS data analysis was performed using the GeneReader system (Qiagen, Inc.) according to manufacturer's instructions (14).

Reverse transcription-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from exosomes using a miRNeasy kit (cat. no. 217184; Qiagen, Inc.). A total of 200 µl plasma was mixed with QIAzol Lysis Reagent (cat. no. 79306; Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Exosomal RNA was reverse transcribed using a Qiagen miRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The levels of miRNA 125-5p were determined in triplicate and analyzed using a Real-time PCR detection system (LineGene K Plus; Hangzhou Bioer Co., Ltd.) using SYBR green qPCRmaster mix (Qiagen, Inc.). PCR was performed in 40 cycles with each cycle consisting of 30 sec at 94°C and 30 sec at 62°C. The PCR data were normalized using the 2−ΔΔCq value method (15), using hsa-miR-16-5p for normalization (16,17). The primers used for the amplification were as follows: hsa-miR-125a-5p, forward, 5′-ACACTCCAGCTGGGTCCCTGAGACCCTTTAAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG-3′; hsa-miR-16-5p, forward, 5′-TAGCAGCACGTAAATATTGGCG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC-3′.

ZetaView nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)

The present study measured exosome particle size and concentration with a ZetaView PMX v110 (Particle Metrix GmbH) using the settings recommended by the manufacturer's software manual. For each exosomal sample, 2 ml of the sample was diluted using 1X PBS buffer, the NTA measurement was recorded and analyzed, and the mean, median and mode, as well as the concentration of the sample, were calculated using ZetaView software (version 8.02.28; Particle Metrix GmbH).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

For TEM, 20 µl of the exosomal sample was fixed to an electron microscopy mesh grid with 2% glutaraldehyde at room temperature, so that the dropping liquid remained on the copper net for 20 min. Subsequently, 2% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate was used to stain samples for 5 min at room temperature, and the filter paper was air-dried at room temperature and observed under a 120 kv biotransmission electron microscope (magnification, ×60,000).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 3.5.0; http://www.R-project.org). The miRNA experiments were performed in triplicate and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Associations between exosomal miR-125a-5p expression and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using unpaired Student's t-test. The heat map was created using the pheatmap R package (version 1.0.12; http://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/pheatmap) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were plotted using the ggplot2 R package (version 3.3.2; CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggplot2). The cut-off values were calculated using Youden's index. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Characterization of isolated exosomes

The results of the present study demonstrated that exosomes had a spherical shape with a diameter of 30–200 nm, as indicated by TEM, and the size distribution of exosomes ranged from 50 to 180 nm in diameter, with a mode value of 140–150 nm, as indicated by NTA (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Identification of exosomes purified from the plasma of patients with cervical cancer. (A) Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis determined the size of exosomes. (B) Exosomes were analyzed under electron microscopy and highlighted with red arrows, with diameter sizes ranging from 50 to 180 nm.

Exosomal miRNA profiling

The present study performed plasma exosomal miRNA profiling for 6 patients with cervical cancer and 6 matched healthy controls. A total of 1,725 unique mature miRNAs were identified from exosome miRNA sequencing data, and 167 miRNAs were included for statistical analysis after removing the miRNAs with <100 average reads per sample. The results of the statistical analysis revealed that 39 miRNAs were differentially expressed between patients with cervical cancer and healthy controls, among which, 8 miRNAs were downregulated and 31 miRNAs were upregulated (P<0.001; fold-change>2.0; Fig. 2A). Considering these exosomal miRNA expression patterns, and evidence obtained from previous studies (7,8), miR-125a-5p was selected for the further analysis of its prognostic values in cervical cancer. In the present study, miR-16a-5p had a small standard deviation, and was also used as an endogenous reference in previously published studies (15,16) (Fig. 2B). Thus, miR-16a-5p was selected as an endogenous reference in the subsequent qPCR assay.
Figure 2.

RNA profiling of exosome samples based on differentially expressed miRNAs. (A) Heat map presenting unsupervised hierarchical clustering of miRNAs. Red indicates miRNAs with high expression levels and blue indicates miRNAs with low expression levels. (B) The expression of hsa-miR-16-5p was stable, while the expression of has-miR-125a-5p was very different in patients with cervical cancer and healthy controls. miRNA/miR, microRNA; hsa, homosapiens.

Prognostic role of plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels in patients with cervical cancer

To assess the potential prognostic role of exosomal miRNA expression levels, miR-125a-5p was quantified in the plasma of 60 subjects, which included 22 healthy individuals and 38 patients with cervical cancer. The results revealed that exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels in patients with cervical cancer were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (P<0.001). ROC curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of exosomal miR-125a-5p for cervical cancer. These analyses revealed that the level of plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p was a potential marker for differentiating between non-cervical and cervical cancer, with an ROC area under the curve value of 0.7129 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.561–0.865] (Fig. 3B). At the cut-off value of 2.537 for miR-125a-5p, cervical cancer diagnostic sensitivities and specificities were 59.1 and 84.2%, respectively.
Figure 3.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis displaying the diagnostic power of exosomal miR-125a-5p. (A) The relative plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels were compared between patients with cervical cancer (n=38) and healthy controls (n=22). The exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels in patients with cervical cancer were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (P<0.001). (B) A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis for determining a cut-off value for differentiating between normal and cancer cells was performed. The AUC value was 0.7129 (95% confidence interval, 0.561–0.865), with a cut-off value of 2.537. miR, microRNA; AUC, area under the curve; hsa, homosapien.

Clinicopathological characteristics and miR-125a-5p profile

miR-125a-5p was significantly associated with age, tumor size and FIGO stage. Compared with HPV-negative patients, miR-125a-5p expression in HPV-positive patients was significantly decreased. However, there was no significant difference between miR-125a-5p expression and lymph node metastasis or histological types (Table I).
Table I.

Association between exosomal miR-125a-5p expression levels and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cervical cancer.

CharacteristicNumber of patientsmiR-125a-5p expression[a]T-valueP-value
Age, years3.4610.0032
  <50  60.76±0.41
  ≥50321.57±0.92
Histological type0.9890.3361
  SCC281.53±0.93
  SDC101.22±0.84
Tumor size, cm3.1550.0039
  <4290.88±0.48
  ≥4  91.62±0.94
FIGO stage2.4750.0217
  IA-IIA290.95±0.59
  IIB-IVB  91.60±0.94
Lymph node metastasis1.3120.1978
  Yes221.60±0.99
  No161.23±0.73
HPV status2.1110.0418
  Positive301.29±0.83
  Negative  82.02±0.88

Mean ± SD. miR, microRNA; SCC, cervical squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma; FIGO, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; HPV, human papillomavirus.

Discussion

Cervical cancer is a common tumor in gynecology. The early screening techniques for cervical cancer include high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing and cervical exfoliation cell examination (18). As certain persistent HR-HPV subtype infections can develop into cervical cancer, the HR-HPV test is highly sensitive and has low specificity in screening for cervical cancer (19). By contrast, cytology has an improved specificity for cervical cancer screening, and cervical screening strategies for women based on cytology are safe and effective (20). Exosomes are a subvesicle structure secreted by a variety of cells in the body; they carry a variety of proteins and nucleic acid substances from cells, and can be easily obtained from peripheral blood and other body fluids, such as joint cavity effusion and pleural effusion (21,22). Thus, in recent years, exosomes have been used as biomarkers for disease diagnosis (23). It has been demonstrated that miRNAs are likely to be transported through exosomes in body fluids (24). When exosomes are released from the original cells, they fuse with the recipient cells and control the gene expression, which increases the possibility of potential tumorigenicity of exosomal miRNA (25,26). In a clinical study (4), exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 have been reported as promising prognostic biomarkers for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Liu et al (27) determined that exosomal circ_0047921, circ_0056285 and circ_0007761 were promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma, including the early stages of disease; in addition, exosomal circ_0056285 was associated with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis. However, serum exosome-derived miRNAs are different from the total serum miRNAs. A previous study determined that there were no correlations between serum miR-126 and exosomal miR-126 (28), and another study demonstrated that serum miR-122 and miR-199a were potential biomarkers that reflect antiviral therapy efficacy in patients with hepatitis C (29); however, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence that exosomal miR-122 and miR-199a have the same predictive effect. A previous study has revealed that miR-125a-5p expression was decreased in clinical gastric cancer tissue samples and gastric cancer cell lines, and was associated with tumorigenesis and poor prognosis (30). Furthermore, an experimental study involving molecular mechanisms have demonstrated that miR-125a-5p inhibited the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer cells by targeting GALNT14 (31), and inhibited the invasion and migration of hepatoma cells by regulating the activity of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway (32). In addition, a previous study revealed that HPV suppresses miR-125a-5p by inhibiting p53 expression in cervical carcinogenesis, and it is speculated that miR-125a-5p may be a therapeutic target for cervical cancer (33). However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on miR-125a-5p in cervical cancer. The present study performed plasma exosomal miRNA sequencing, the results of which revealed that a total of 39 miRNAs were differentially expressed between patients with cervical cancer and healthy controls, among which, 8 miRNAs were downregulated and 31 miRNAs were upregulated with the statistical criteria of P<0.001, fold-change >2.0. Based on both NGS and PCR experiments, exosomal miR-125a-5p appears to be a promising biomarker. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated based on the PCR results (0.7129; 95% CI, 0.561–0.865). The present study revealed that miR-125a-5p was significantly associated with age; 6 patients <50 years of age had a lower miR-125a-5p level compared with 32 patients ≥50 years of age. In addition, tumor size and FIGO stage were associated with miR-125a-5p level, but no differences were observed between cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma. However, it should be noted that exosomal miRNAs do not necessarily represent cellular levels, since the miRNA sorting mechanism may affect the incorporation of miRNA into exosomes. It should also be noted that the present study contained a small number of samples and more samples are required to support the conclusions of the present study. As previously reported, miR-125a-5p could be a potential biomarker of certain types of cancer, such as breast (9), hepatocellular (34) and colon cancer (12), which indicates that miR-125a-5p is not a cervical cancer specific biomarker. The present study suggested that when miR-125a-5p expression is decreased, miR-125a-5p cannot be relied on to determine which type of cancer, but it may provide auxiliary diagnostic value for clinical samples with an uncertain diagnosis. Liquid biopsy is a new area of research, and it is therefore not appropriate for them to replace traditional methods in diagnosing cancer, including exosome-based diagnosis and screening programs. However, it is still of great scientific value to investigate novel approaches to cancer diagnosis, including exosomal miRNAs. However, the present study has several limitations. Different histological types of cervical cancer may have different molecular mechanisms and different circulating exosomal miRNAs. Future studies should focus on one histological subtype, squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, and include more samples to further confirm the present results. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p is poorly expressed in cervical cancer and that miR-125a-5p could be regarded as a diagnostic marker for cervical cancer. Further research with larger sample sizes is required to confirm these results.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Exosomes/microvesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication.

Authors:  Giovanni Camussi; Maria C Deregibus; Stefania Bruno; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Luigi Biancone
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Exosomes: Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Delivery Vehicles for Cancer.

Authors:  Liangdi Jiang; Yongwei Gu; Yue Du; Jiyong Liu
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Comparison of HPV DNA testing in cervical exfoliated cells and tissue biopsies among HIV-positive women in Kenya.

Authors:  Hugo De Vuyst; Michael H Chung; Iacopo Baussano; Nelly R Mugo; Vanessa Tenet; Folkert J van Kemenade; Farzana S Rana; Samah R Sakr; Chris J L M Meijer; Peter J F Snijders; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Effects of Focal Cerebral Ischemia on Exosomal Versus Serum miR126.

Authors:  Fan Chen; Yang Du; Elga Esposito; Yi Liu; Shuzhen Guo; Xiaoying Wang; Eng H Lo; Changhong Xing; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Thioridazine induces apoptosis by targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in cervical and endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Sokbom Kang; Seung Myung Dong; Boh-Ram Kim; Mi Sun Park; Barry Trink; Hyun-Jung Byun; Seung Bae Rho
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Ectopic expression of MiR-125a inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting MMP11 and VEGF.

Authors:  Qian Bi; Shanhong Tang; Lin Xia; Rui Du; Rui Fan; Liucun Gao; Jiang Jin; Shuhui Liang; Zheng Chen; Guanghui Xu; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jie Liu; Yongquan Shi; Jie Ding; Daiming Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study.

Authors:  Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-13

Review 9.  MicroRNAs transported by exosomes in body fluids as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer.

Authors:  Iván Salido-Guadarrama; Sandra Romero-Cordoba; Oscar Peralta-Zaragoza; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Mauricio Rodríguez-Dorantes
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Role of exosomes in malignant glioma: microRNAs and proteins in pathogenesis and diagnosis.

Authors:  Amir B Ghaemmaghami; Maryam Mahjoubin-Tehran; Ahmad Movahedpour; Korosh Morshedi; Amirhossein Sheida; Seyed Pouya Taghavi; Hamed Mirzaei; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 7.525

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparative Profiling of Circulating Exosomal Small RNAs Derived From Peruvian Patients With Tuberculosis and Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Heinner Guio; Victor Aliaga-Tobar; Marco Galarza; Oscar Pellon-Cardenas; Silvia Capristano; Henry L Gomez; Mivael Olivera; Cesar Sanchez; Vinicius Maracaja-Coutinho
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.073

Review 2.  Exosomes as Biomarkers for Female Reproductive Diseases Diagnosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Sahar Esfandyari; Hoda Elkafas; Rishi Man Chugh; Hang-Soo Park; Antonia Navarro; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Exosomes: Small vesicles with big roles in cancer, vaccine development, and therapeutics.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Thakur; Diana Carolina Parra; Pedram Motallebnejad; Marcelo Brocchi; Huanhuan Joyce Chen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-08-28

Review 4.  Nucleic acids and proteins carried by exosomes of different origins as potential biomarkers for gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Miaomiao Ye; Jing Wang; Shuya Pan; Lihong Zheng; Zhi-Wei Wang; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 7.200

5.  Systematic assessment of microRNAs associated with lung cancer and physical exercise.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Libo He; Wang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Advances in Exosomes as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers for Gynaecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Mengdan Miao; Yifei Miao; Yanping Zhu; Junnan Wang; Huaijun Zhou
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Nomogram for predicted probability of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions using miRNA in cervical mucus, HPV genotype and age.

Authors:  Kiriko Kotani; Takuma Fujii; Aya Iwata; Iwao Kukimoto; Eiji Nishio; Takeji Mitani; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Ryoko Ichikawa; Hiroyuki Nomura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  miR-125a attenuates the malignant biological behaviors of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells through Rad51.

Authors:  Zeping Liu; Jinchang Huang; Qiuju Jiang; Xiaoling Li; Xiaohui Tang; Shasha Chen; Liling Jiang; Genghua Fu; Sijun Liu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 6.832

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.