Leaf Endophytes of Populus trichocarpa Act as Pathogens of Neighboring Plant Species.

The conventional definition of endophytes is that they do not cause disease, whereas pathogens do. Complicating this convention, however, is the poorly explored phenomenon that some microbes are endophytes in some plants but pathogens in others. Black cottonwood or poplar (Populus trichocarpa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) are common wild and crop plants, respectively, in the Pacific Northwest USA. The former anchors wild, riparian communities, whereas the latter is an introduced domesticate of commercial importance in the region. We isolated Fusarium culmorum - a well-known pathogen of wheat causing both blight and rot - from the leaf of a black cottonwood tree in western Washington. The pathogenicity of this cottonwood isolate and of a wheat isolate of F. culmorum were compared by inoculating both cottonwood and wheat in a greenhouse experiment. We found that both the cottonwood and wheat isolates of F. culmorum significantly reduced the growth of wheat, whereas they had no impact on cottonwood growth. Our results demonstrate that the cottonwood isolate of F. culmorum is endophytic in one plant species but pathogenic in another. Using sequence-based methods, we found an additional 56 taxa in the foliar microbiome of cottonwood that matched the sequences of pathogens of other plants of the region. These sequence-based findings suggest, though they do not prove, that P. trichocarpa may host many additional pathogens of other plants.

Introduction

The plant microbiome is thought to aid plants under stressful conditions to enable them to adapt to new habitats. This is, in essence, the habitat-adapted symbiosis hypothesis (Rodriguez et al., 2004, 2008). This hypothesis is at the heart of current attempts to engineer microbiome-based adaptation to climate change, and to other stresses of a rapidly changing world (Busby et al., 2017). One of the challenges in this effort is that plants can asymptomatically host pathogens of other plants (Porras-Alfaro and Bayman, 2011). A concern is thus that successful bio-engineering of one plant could lead to undesirable, non-target, spillover effects in another, via augmentation of a pathogen of the latter.

In plant microbiome studies currently, and in earlier studies, pathogens of other plants are regularly reported on the basis of the taxa that they represent. Pathogenic function is seldom, however, confirmed experimentally. For example, in a study of the endophytes of Centaurea stoebe (Shipunov et al., 2008), the following pathogens were reported without proof of function: Botrytis cinerea, the cause of gray mold of many other plants (though never of C. stoebe itself), Diaporthe helianthi, the cause of Phomopsis stem canker of sunflower, Gibberella avenacea, the cause of many rots, blights and declines of many crops (though again, not of C. stoebe itself), and many other taxa of Fusarium and Alternaria that are pathogens of plants other than C. stoebe. Sequence-based evidence of the pathogen that causes the “mal secco” disease of citrus was even found in achenes of C. stoebe, although inoculations were never performed to confirm function (Shipunov et al., 2008; Migheli et al., 2009). In a study of endophytes of Bromus tectorum, Fusarium oxysporum was reported (Baynes et al., 2012). Fusarium oxysporum causes vascular wilts of a very wide range of plants, as well as blights, rots and damping off (Farr and Rossman, 2020), but the endophytic isolate in B. tectorum might possibly have been non-pathogenic. Similarly, species of Geniculosporium and Xylaria, pathogenic to various plants, were found as endophytes in Abies, or fir, trees (Carroll and Carroll, 1978). Further examples from other woody plants have been summarized in a study of white pine endophytes that often resembled pathogens of other plants (Ganley et al., 2004). In all of these studies, pathogenic function was suggested by the identification of isolates and/or sequences representative of pathogenic taxa of other plants; function was not, however, proven via inoculation assay in these studies.

In contrast, in studies focused on invaded plant communities, spillover of a pathogen from one host to another has been functionally demonstrated. For example, Alternaria spp., isolated from the reservoir host, Schedonorus arundinaceus (tall fescue, a highly invasive grass species in North America), could be inoculated into co-occurring grasses in which these fungi caused disease symptoms and decreased biomass (Wilson et al., 2014). Pathogen spillover from a reservoir host to other plants can also operate within seed banks in plant communities invaded by Bromus tectorum (Beckstead et al., 2010). Pathogen spillover could be ecologically common and important in natural plant communities, invaded or not, but a shortage of studies hampers generalization.

In a third area of research, on pathogens shared by crop and weedy plants, there are examples of pathogen movement from weed to crop, and its epidemiological significance (Wisler and Norris, 2005). Crop rotation to reduce pathogen inoculum can even fail because weedy plants host the pathogen when the crop is absent. For instance, weedy Chenopodium album can host Verticillium albo-atrum that can then re-infect alfalfa when it is again grown in a given field (Busch and Smith, 1982). Rust fungi can be hosted by wild oats and then infect domesticated oats (Burdon et al., 1983). Movement of pathogens in the other direction (i.e., from crop plants to weeds or to wild plants) has been little studied (Blitzer et al., 2012), which is attributed to little study generally of natural plant pathosystems (Power and Mitchell, 2004).

A recent, molecular field study of foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa revealed taxa that are putative pathogens of other plants (Barge et al., 2019). P. trichocarpa is the wild black cottonwood tree of riparian communities in the Pacific Northwest. It is frequently found in close proximity to wheat and other crops of the region. Here, we summarize the pathogens of other plants that were found in the sequence-based study (Barge et al., 2019), and report on an experiment testing the pathogenicity of Fusarium culmorum isolated from P. trichocarpa on both wheat and cottonwood. Fusarium culmorum is a well-known pathogen of wheat, that has not been reported as a pathogen of P. trichocarpa. However, F. culmorum has been reported as a mutualist in dunegrass of the region (Rodriguez et al., 2008). We therefore expected that our assay with a cottonwood isolate could reveal positive, negative, or neutral effects on growth of cottonwood and wheat.

Materials and Methods

Greenhouse Inoculation Assay

We selected one putative pathogen for a pathogenicity experiment: Fusarium culmorum. An isolate of F. culmorum collected from asymptomatic leaves of P. trichocarpa in a previous study (SNO-11, Busby et al., 2016) produced a colony resembling a wheat isolate of Fusarium culmorum, a known pathogen of wheat. We identified the isolate on the basis of micro-morphology as Fusarium. To obtain a species-level identification we extracted DNA from the isolate, then amplified and sequenced the full ITS region. The Sanger sequence of the full ITS region for this isolate is archived in the NCBI genbank (accession number MN154167). This particular cottonwood, or poplar isolate, P. trichocarpa (FCP) was then used in the inoculation experiment below to test the hypothesis of endophytes as functional pathogens of other plants. For comparative purposes we used a wheat isolate of F. culmorum (FCW) from a previous study (Ridout and Newcombe, 2016).

Cultures of each strain were grown on 4% potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 2 weeks. At 2 weeks plates were flushed with sterile distilled water (SDW) and conidia were loosened with a sterile, bent glass rod. The solution was homogenized with a tissue macerator (Tissue Tearor™, BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) and brought to volume with SDW. Conidial concentrations of the FCW and FCP suspensions were adjusted to 106 conidia per milliliter using a Neubauer hemacytometer.

Seeds of P. trichocarpa (collected from a wild tree growing in Moscow, ID) and T. aestivum (University of Idaho line 306 UI-SRG, Lot: 1209 Moscow HRWW5, class hard red winter) were sown into soilless mix (Sunshine Professional Growing Mix #1, Sun Gro Horticulture, Sacramento, CA) in four-inch pots. Seeds were germinated and seedlings grown at a diurnal temperature cycle of 18°C/15°C with a 16-h day length. Ninety pots were sown for each species. Seedlings were grown in the greenhouse for 12 days prior to inoculation.

We inoculated T. aestivum and P. trichocarpa with the F. culmorum isolated from P. trichocarpa (FCP) and a pathogenic strain of F. culmorum (FCW) known to cause crown rot in T. aestivum (Washington State University/ USDA ARS, Pullman WA: cereal pathogen collections). Twelve days following sowing, 30 seedlings each of P. trichocarpa and T. aestivum were inoculated at the crown with either 10 mL of FCP suspension, 10 mL of FCW suspension, or 10 mL of SDW (sterile distilled water) for a negative control. The plants were kept in the greenhouse for 47 days while disease developed. Visual analyses were made to determine disease presence or absence in inoculated seedlings. T. aestivum seedlings were then harvested by removing the above-ground vegetation at the crown; F. culmorum causes crown rot and thus affects above-ground biomass. This biomass was then dried in an oven at 60°C for roughly 48 h, although drying time varied somewhat. Above-ground biomass of P. trichocarpa seedlings was harvested 4 days later and dried at 60°C for 70 h. Dry biomass was determined for all the seedlings.

Molecular Field Survey

We used ITS sequence data from a previously published molecular field survey of Populus trichocarpa foliar fungi across ten watersheds in the Pacific Northwest, USA (Busby et al., 2016) to identify fungal taxa likely to cause disease in other plants. A complete description of this molecular field survey can be found in Busby et al. (2016). In brief, we sampled leaves from six trees in 10 populations. Leaves were surface sterilized and lyophilized prior to DNA extraction. We used a modified version of the primer set ITS1F and ITS2 for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) (Smith and Peay, 2014). PCR products were cleaned using the Agencourt Ampure XP kit (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), quantified using the Qubit hs-DS-DNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on a Tecan Infinite F200 Pro plate reader (Tecan, Morrisville, NC, USA) (285 nm excitation and 530 nm emission), then pooled at equimolar concentrations prior to 250-bp paired-end sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. Raw sequence data are deposited in NCBI's Short Read Archive (accession no. SRP064132, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47529/).

Both QIIME (Caporaso et al., 2010) and UPARSE (Edgar, 2013) were used to process the sequence data. Forward and reverse reads were paired with USEARCH v.7.0.1001, and discarded if they contained > 0.25 expected errors. High-quality sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in USEARCH using UPARSE-OTU and UPARSE OTU algorithms at 97% similarity. Taxonomy was assigned using the BLAST algorithm in QIIME, which uses the UNITE fungal ITS database. Additionally, the 500 most abundant OTUs were checked using BLAST searches against the NCBI GenBank. In total, 968 fungal taxa were identified. For this study, we identified putative pathogens in the dataset by searching for all taxa in the USDA SMML databases (Farr and Rossman, 2020). We calculated the proportional abundance of each putative pathogen within a sample by dividing the number of pathogen reads in the sample by the number of total reads in the sample. We additionally calculated the mean proportional abundance of each putative pathogen for each tree population.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed in RStudio v.3.6.3 (RStudio Team 2015). We used a one-way analysis of variance to compare dry weights among the treatment groups in both T. aestivum and P. trichocarpa.

Results and Discussion

Comparison of Cottonwood and Wheat Isolates of Fusarium Culmorum

Both isolates of F. culmorum – from cottonwood and wheat – caused visual symptoms of disease (Figure 1) and a reduction in above-ground biomass for wheat; neither symptoms nor a reduction in biomass were seen in cottonwood (Figure 2). Ten days after the inoculation, wheat leaves became symptomatic. The first necrotic lesions appeared on the twelfth day post-inoculation. The uninoculated wheat controls remained asymptomatic throughout the experiment (Figure 1). After destructive sampling, the mean mass of the control plants was 7.70 grams, compared to 6.22 and 6.35 g, respectively (F = 11.13, p = 4.84 × 10−5; Figure 2). Thus, both isolates were associated with an ~20% reduction in wheat biomass. In contrast, both isolates of F. culmorum – from cottonwood and wheat – caused no visible symptoms of disease (Figure 1) nor impacted cottonwood biomass (F = 0.33, p = 0.72; Figure 2).

Figure 1

Fusarium culmorum isolates caused disease in wheat (A) but not in poplars (B). Wheat and poplars were inoculated with an isolate of F. culmorum from wheat (FCW) and from P. trichocarpa (FCP), or with sterile water for the control (CTRL).

Figure 2

Fusarium culmorum isolates reduced biomass in wheat (A) but not in poplars (B). FCW: isolate of F. culmorum from wheat. FCP: isolate of F. culmorum from P. trichocarpa. CTRL: sterile water control. Bars are standard error.

The USDA SMML Fungal Database shows that F. culmorum has previously been reported from 134 plant species, in 22 families (Farr and Rossman, 2020). It is most common as a pathogen of plants of the grass family, Poaceae, but it is common in plants of other families as an endophyte. This report is the first to mention any species of Populus and even its family, Salicaceae, as hosts of endophytic F. culmorum. The 23 families in which F. culmorum has now been reported are the following: Amaranthaceae, Anacardiaceae, Apiaceae, Asparagaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Convolvulaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Cyperaceae, Ericaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lamiaceae, Liliaceae, Linaceae, Malvaceae, Pinaceae, Poaceae, Polygonaceae, Salicaceae, and Solanaceae.

Many pathogens like F. culmorum are pathogenic in only some of the plant species from which they have been reported. In others they are present as endophytes or even as mutualists (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008; Rodriguez et al., 2008). In some, such as Washington's coastal dunegrass (Leymus mollis), F. culmorum is a mutualist that improves both salt and drought tolerance. With unequal effects on competing species of plants, microbes like F. culmorum could be important drivers of “apparent competition” (Orrock and Witter, 2010; Cobey and Lipsitch, 2013). This occurs when one competitor is favored by hosting a pathogen of the other.

ITS sequencing of Fungal Endophytes in Cottonwood Leaves

We identified 56 sequence-based taxa in the foliar microbiome of cottonwood that are pathogens of other plants of the region (Table 1), but that are not known to cause disease in P. trichocarpa (Newcombe, 1996). Cryptodiaporthe pulchella, which is a pathogen of a few species of Populus and Salix, has not been recorded as a pathogen of P. trichocarpa (Farr and Rossman, 2020). Similarly, Knufia cryptophialidica affects P. tremuloides but not P. trichocarpa (Farr and Rossman, 2020). Some pathogens of P. trichocarpa were found as foliar endophytes in our earlier studies, and those have been reported and discussed elsewhere (Busby et al., 2016; Barge et al., 2019).

Table 1

High-throughput sequencing of leaves of Populus trichocarpa indicated GenBank- and USDA SMML-reported pathogens of agricultural (A) or non-agricultural plants (NA), their diseases, locations, accession numbers, and % of total sequences in the dataset.

Pathogen	Host plant	A or NA	Disease	Location	Pathogen's GenBank accession number	% of total seqs
Ramularia vizellae	Brassica crops	A	Leaf spot	The Netherlands	EU019285	1.8
Monilinia sp.	Malus	A	Fruit rot	Japan	AB693917	1.4
Neofabraea malicortis	Malus and Pyrus	A	Stem canker	The Netherlands	AF141161	<1
Microcyclospora tardicrescens	Malus domestica	A	Sooty blotch	Slovenia	GU570541	<1
Phoma macrostoma	Malus domestica	A	Fruit rot	Switzerland	HQ166389	<1
Phaeosphaeria pontiformis	Triticum aestivum	A	Leaf blight	Sweden	KC989090	<1
Phoma macrostoma	Lens esculenta	A	Bioherbicide	Canada	DQ474091	<1
Cladosporium cladosporioides	Vitis vinifera	A	Fruit rot	Chile	EU622927	<1
Diaporthe eres	Vitis vinifera	A	Dieback	California, USA	KF017914	<1
Microcyclospora pomicola	Malus domestica	A	Sooty blotch	Germany	GU570539.1	<1
Diaporthe cf. nobilis	Malus pumila	A	Dieback	New Zealand	KC343149.1	<1
Gnomoniopsis idaeicola	Actinidia deliciosa	A	Canker	France	KT692597	<1
Devriesia pseudoamericana	Malus domestica	A	Sooty blotch	Germany	GU570527	<1
Phaeomoniella zymoides	Prunus salicina	A	Wood necrosis	South Africa	GQ154600	<1
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis	Triticum	A	Tan spot	Japan	AM887495	<1
Ramularia pratensis	Rumex crispus	NA	Leaf spot	South Korea	KF251223	3.7
Botrytis cinereal	Picea abies	NA	Root rot	Canada	KF859924	1.7
Ramularia eucalypti	Eucalyptus	NA	Leaf spot	Australia	EF394862	1
Fusarium proliferatum	Pinus	NA	Pitch canker	The Netherlands	KM231816	<1
Fusarium avenaceum	Phragmites australis	NA	Leaf blight	New Jersey, USA	KT827258	<1
Ramularia eucalypti	Corymbia grandifolia	NA	Leaf spot	Italy	EF394861	<1
Colletotrichum phormii	Phormium	NA	Leaf blight	New Zealand	DQ286142.1	<1
Sydowia polyspora	Pinus mugo	NA	Needle blight	Lithuania	GQ412724	<1
Elytroderma deformans	Pinus ponderosa	NA	Needle blight	Montana, USA	AF203469	<1
Ramularia eucalypti	Eucalyptus	NA	Leaf spot	The Netherlands	KF251221	<1
Neostagonospora caricis	Carex	NA	Leaf blight	The Netherlands	KF251163	<1
Taphrina carpini	Carpinus betulus	NA	Witches' broom	Slovakia	AF492085	<1
Curvularia trifolii	Leucospermum	NA	Leaf spot	Australia	JN712459	<1
Cryptodiaporthe pulchella	Salix lucida	NA	Dieback	Maryland, USA	GU367061	<1
Devriesia fraseriae	Melaleuca	NA	Leaf spot	The Netherlands	HQ599602	<1
Toxicocladosporium strelitziae	Strelitzia reginae	NA	Floral lesions	South Africa	JX069874	<1
Pilidium acerinum	Aesculus hippocastanum	NA	Leaf blight	The Netherlands	NR_119500	<1
Xenostigmina zilleri	Acer macrophyllum	NA	Leaf spot	Canada	FJ839639	<1
Mycosphaerella fragariae	Platanus	NA	Leaf blight	South Korea	GU214691	<1
Ilyonectria radicicola	Pinus sylvestris	NA	Root rot	Sweden	KF156312	<1
Taphrina alni	Alnus incana	NA	Tongues on female catkins	Austria	AF492076	<1
Taphrina communis	Prunusamericana	NA	Plum pockets and leaf curl	USA	AF492086	<1
Neosetophoma samarorum	Urtica dioica	NA	Fruit rot	The Netherlands	KF251162	<1
Ciborinia camelliae	Hepatica	NA	Root rot	Japan	AB516659	<1
Phoma sp.	Rosa rugosa	NA	Root rot	Lithuania	KF646102	<1
Boeremia exigua var. heteromorpha	Nerium oleander	NA	Leaf spot & dieback	United Kingdom	JX467690	<1
Drechslera dematioidea	Poaceae grasses	NA	Leaf spot	British Columbia, Canada	JN712466	<1
Diplodina microsperma	Protea	NA	Leaf spot	New Zealand	JN712461	<1
Diaporthe viticola	Fraxinus excelsior	NA	Leaf spot	The Netherlands	KC343230	<1
Phoma herbarum	Rosa multiflora	NA	Leaf spot	The Netherlands	KF251212.1	<1
Knufia cryptophialidica	Populus balsamifera	NA	Stem canker	Alberta, Canada	JN040501.1	<1
Plectosphaerella sp.	Alnus glutinosa	NA	Stem canker	Latvia	JF340251.1	<1
Plagiostoma barriae	Acer macrophyllum	NA	Anthracnose	Washington, USA	EU254997.1	<1
Strumella sp.	Alnus incana	NA	Stem canker	Latvia	GU062276	<1
Taphrina weisneri	Prunus fruticosa	NA	Witches' broom and leaf curl	Portugal	AF492126.1	<1
Rhizosphaera pseudotsugae	Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii	NA	Needle cast	Germany	EU700369	<1
Diaporthe sp.	Actinidia	NA	Leaf spot	New Zealand	KC145848	<1
Teratosphaeria knoxdaviesii	Protea	NA	Leaf spot	South Africa	EU707866.1	<1
Catenulostroma hermanusense	Phaenocoma prolifera	NA	Leaf bract lesions	South Africa	JF499833	<1
Phaeosphaeria nodorum	Lolium perenne	NA	Blotch	Denmark	KF251177	<1
Septoria cretae	Nerium oleander	NA	Leaf spot	Greece	KF251233.1	<1

Fifteen pathogens of agricultural or cultivated plants were found to varying extent in leaves of P. trichocarpa sampled in the Pacific Northwest (Table 1). These 15 fungal taxa identified by sequence homology with GenBank accessions were associated with many regionally important plants. Malus (apple) stood out, as 7 of the 15 pathogens were associated with this leading orchard crop of the region. Three wheat pathogens (i.e., Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, Phaeosphaeria pontiformis, Phaeosphaeria nodorum) were found in addition to the cultured and pathogenicity-tested isolate of F. culmorum. Another three taxa of fungal pathogens were found that have been associated with damage to cherry and grape, which are also regionally important crops. It is important to note that the agricultural host plants listed in Table 1 represent only a fraction of the broad host ranges of this group of 15 pathogen taxa. For example, Phoma macrostoma is potentially pathogenic to all dicots (Bailey et al., 2011), and as such this fungus has been of interest as a bioherbicide that could be used with monocot crops.

Among the 41 pathogens of non-agricultural plants, there were some with very broad host ranges (e.g., Botrytis cinerea) and others that were very host-specific (Table 1). Elytroderma deformans is an example of the latter as it only causes disease of species of Pinus subgenus Pinus, otherwise known as the “hard” or diploxylon pines. Elytroderma deformans is also limited in its distribution in North America, and its presence as an endophyte has been reported only in Pinus subgenus Strobus (Ganley et al., 2004). Thus, this report is the first for E. deformans in an angiosperm tree. A second example was found in the four taxa of Taphrina that are similarly host-specific pathogens. They parasitize species of Prunus, Alnus, and Carpinus. A third example, Ciborinia camelliae, specifically affects flowers of species of Camellia (Farr and Rossman, 2020). The most abundant pathogen was one that most closely matched a GenBank accession of Ramularia pratensis found on Rumex crispus in Korea. It is a specialized pathogen of leaves of species in only three genera, including Rumex, of the Polygonaceae. These genera and Ramularia pratensis are now found around the world where these plants have been introduced (Farr and Rossman, 2020).

In some cases the mean proportional abundance of a putative pathogen in the ITS dataset was consistent with expectations based on the abundance and distribution of the pathogen's preferred host. For example, F. proliferatum was more abundant in the two Idaho sites where its host, Pinus ponderosa (Ocamb et al., 2002), is dominant. Similarly, R. vizellae was more abundant in the western Washington sites where Brassica seed production occurs (Du Toit, 2004).

The putative pathogens of other plants, revealed here by ITS metabarcoding, would need to be tested for pathogenicity, as we have done with F. culmorum. If confirmed as pathogens, they could be either unspecialized and broad-range like F. culmorum, or highly host-specific. Host specificity varies considerably among the fungal pathogens of Populus (Newcombe, 1996) and among plant pathogens generally. Host ranges tend to be broader when they are compiled from identifications of pathogens and narrower when investigated via functional assay (Newcombe, 2003; Benítez et al., 2013; Sarmiento et al., 2017). However, we have not explored the transmissibility of the 56 pathogens, nor even that of F. culmorum, since we used artificial inoculation to prove the latter's pathogenicity toward wheat. Would cottonwood seedlings infected with Ramularia pratensis transmit their infection in nature to competing species of Rumex, Rheum or Oxyria? Would the competitive balance be tipped due to cottonwood's tolerance and the susceptibility of the others? Further studies are needed to explore how hosting pathogens of neighboring plants contributes to apparent competition.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, MN154167, in NCBI's Short Read Archive (accession no. SRP064132, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47529/).

Author Contributions

GN and PB conceived of the idea for the study and wrote the manuscript with input from SF and MR. SF and MR conducted experiments. PB analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.