Literature DB >> 33281404

Evolution of Robotic Surgery in a Colorectal Cancer Unit in India.

Jitender Rohila1, Praveen Kammar1, Anadi Pachaury1, Ashwin de'Souza1, Avanish Saklani1.   

Abstract

Only a handful of institutions in the country have an established robotic surgery program. Evolution of robotic surgery in the colorectal division, from inception to recent times, is presented here. All the patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery from the inception of the program (September 2014) to August 2019 were identified. The patient and treatment details and short-term outcomes were collected retrospectively from the prospectively maintained database. The cohort was divided into four chronological groups (group 1 being the oldest) to assess the surgical trends. There were 202 patients. Seventy-one percent were male. Mean BMI was 23.25. Low rectal tumours were most common (47%). A total of 74.3% patients received neo-adjuvant treatment. Multivisceral resection was done in 22 patients, including 4 synchronous liver resections. Average operating time for standard rectal surgery was 280 min with average blood loss of 235 ml. The mean nodal yield was 14. Circumferential resection margin positivity was 6.4%. The mean hospital stay for pelvic exenteration was significantly higher than the rest of the surgeries (except for posterior exenteration and total proctocolectomy) (p = 0.00). Clavin-Dindo grade 3 and 4 complications were seen in 10% patients. As the experience of the team increased, more complex cases were performed. Blood loss, margin positivity, nodal yield, leak rates and complications were evaluated group wise (excluding those with additional procedures) to assess the impact of experience. We did not find any significant change in the parameters studied. With increasing experience, the complexity of surgical procedures performed on da Vinci Xi platform can be increased in a systematic manner. Our short-term outcomes, i.e. nodes harvested, margin positivity, hospital stay and morbidity, are on par with world standards. However, we did not find any significant improvement in these parameters with increasing experience. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic colorectal cancer surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33281404      PMCID: PMC7714823          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01105-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  25 in total

1.  The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Kaity Sng; Masayasu Hara; Jae-Won Shin; Byung-Eun Yoo; Kyung-Sook Yang; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; Mercedes Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; M Luisa Reyes-Díaz; Jorge Manuel Vazquez-Monchul; Ana M Garcia-Cabrera; Javier Padillo; Fernando De la Portilla
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Daniel P Nussbaum; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer - a video vignette.

Authors:  S Sasi; J Rohila; P Kammar; S Kurunkar; A Desouza; A Saklani
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with Enbloc Resection of Seminal Vesicle for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Vishwas D Pai; Manish Bhandare; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  The Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Low Rectal Resection of a Novice Rectal Surgeon.

Authors:  Chi Chung Foo; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Se Jin Baek; Sami Al-Asari; Duck Hyoun Jeong; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Total robotic radical rectal resection with da Vinci Xi system: single docking, single phase technique.

Authors:  Anup Sunil Tamhankar; Sudhir Jatal; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Laparoscopic Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, Technique and Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Pokharkar; Praveen Kammar; Ashwin D'souza; Rahul Bhamre; Pavan Sugoor; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Robotic colorectal surgery for laparoscopic surgeons with limited experience: preliminary experiences for 40 consecutive cases at a single medical center.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Yung-Sung Yeh; Cheng-Jen Ma; Tak-Kee Choy; Ming-Yii Huang; Chun-Ming Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Wen-Hung Hsu; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.