| Literature DB >> 33281373 |
Tapsri R Marak1, Deepak Bhagat1, Swapnali Borah2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tea-plucking activity in Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India is performed in a traditional way making the majority of women workers, especially those who have spent more years in tea-plucking activity prone to musculoskeletal disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Ergonomics; musculoskeletal disorders; posture; tea cultivation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33281373 PMCID: PMC7703822 DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_185_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Occup Environ Med ISSN: 0973-2284
Musculoskeletal problems faced by the respondents
| Different parts of the body | Age group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20-35 years ( | 36-50 years ( | 20-50 years ( | |
| Upper extremity | |||
| Head | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Eye | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| Neck | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Shoulder joint | 3.8 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| Upper arm | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Elbow | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
| Lower arm | 3 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
| Wrist (RH) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Wrist (LH) | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| Fingers (RH) | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Fingers (LH) | 4 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Upper back | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Lower extremity | |||
| Low back | 4.7 | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| Buttock | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Upper leg/thigh | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| Knee | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
| Calf muscle | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Ankle | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Feet/toe | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Note: 5-point scale (1=very mild, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe) Percentage Reduction of Handgrip Strength
Percentage reduction in the handgrip strength in tea-plucking activity
| Parameter | Age group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-35 years ( | 36-50 years ( | Total (20-50 years) ( | ||||
| Right hand | Left hand | Right hand | Left hand | Right hand | Left hand | |
| Before lunch | 8.98 (4.63) | 8.71 (4.23) | 9.12 (5.78) | 8.63 (6.47) | 8.73 (0.20) | 8.91 (0.10) |
| Just before end of work | 20.08 (6.99) | 18.75 (6.29) | 15.84 (6.80) | 15.80 (8.03) | 17.96 (2.12) | 17.27 (1.47) |
Note: Figures in parentheses indicate standard deviationPercentage Reduction of Back Strength
Percentage reduction of the average strength of back of the respondents
| Age group | Before lunch | Just before end of work |
|---|---|---|
| 20-35 years ( | 2.49 (0.9) | 8.29 (2) |
| 36-50 years ( | 2.15 (1.1) | 8.86 (1.9) |
| Total (20-50 years) ( | 2.32 (0.2) | 8.57 (0.4) |
Note: Figures in parentheses indicate standard deviation (SD) RULA and REBA Scores
RULA and REBA scores for women in teaplucking activity
| Method | Risk assessment score | Risk level | Action level |
|---|---|---|---|
| RULA | 07 | High | Investigate and implement change |
| REBA | 11 | Very high risk | Implement change |
RULA: rapid upper limb assessment; REBA: rapid entire body assessment
Figure 1RULA scoring flowchart
Figure 2REBA scoring flowchart
Correlation between age, years of involvement and BMI of women workers with their musculoskeletal problems
| Age | Work Experience | BMI | MSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .655** | .287 | .497** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .072 | .001 | ||
| Work Experience | Pearson Correlation | .655** | 1 | .121 | .320* |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .456 | .044 | ||
| BMI | Pearson Correlation | .287 | .121 | 1 | .250 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .072 | .456 | .119 | ||
| MSD | Pearson Correlation | .497** | .320* | .250 | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .001 | .044 | .119 |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)