| Literature DB >> 33281313 |
Mariya P Jiandani1, Bela Agarwal2, Gaurang Baxi3, Sudeep Kale4, Titiksha Pol5, Anjali Bhise6, Unnati Pandit5, Jaimala V Shetye1, Abhijit Diwate7, Umanjali Damke8, Savita Ravindra9, Prajakta Patil10, Raziya M Nagarwala11, Pratibha Gaikwad12, Shabnam Agarwal13, Kushal Madan14, Prasobh Jacob15, Praveen J Surendran15, Narasimman Swaminathan16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the Wuhan pandemic spread to India, more than lakhs of population were affected with COVID-19 with varying severities. Physiotherapists participated as frontline workers to contribute to management of patients in COVID-19 in reducing morbidity of these patients and aiding them to road to recovery. With infrastructure and patient characteristics different from the West and lack of adequate evidence to existing practices, there was a need to formulate a national consensus.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Chest physiotherapy; Coronavirus; Early mobilization; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33281313 PMCID: PMC7689134 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med ISSN: 0972-5229
Criteria for quality of evidence levels and grading of strength of recommendations used in formulation of current recommendations
| Evidence from ≥1 RCT good-quality and well-conducted randomized control trial(s) or meta-analysis of RCTs | 1 |
| Evidence from at least one RCT of moderate quality or well-designed clinical trial without randomization; or from cohort or case-controlled studies | 2 |
| Evidence from descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees, or opinion of respected authorities based on clinical experience | 3 |
| Not backed by sufficient evidence; however, a consensus reached by the working group, based on clinical experience and expertise | UPP |
| Strong: To do or not to do where the benefits clearly outweigh the risk or vice versa for most if not all the patients | A |
| Weak recommendations where benefits and risk are more closely balanced or are more uncertain. | B |
Classification of symptomatic COVID-19 patients
| Mild pneumonia | Mild or no change at rest (SpO2 of 92–94%) | Stable | Low-flow oxygen | No | Normal |
| Moderate pneumonia | Drop in SpO2 during activity | Tachycardia and hemodynamic variability | High-flow oxygen (HFO) system/venturi mask | Fever, cough, breathlessness | Ground glass opacities and bilateral lung mottling |
| Severe | Needs high FiO2 and PEEP to maintain oxygenation | Unstable/altered hemodynamics needs respiratory support | Mechanical ventilator (MV) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) | Altered mental status, Signs of ARDS (mild to severe)[ | ARDS changes |
| Critical | Needs high FiO2 and PEEP to maintain oxygenation | Unstable/altered hemodynamics needs respiratory support | Mechanical ventilator or on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) | ARDS, multiorgan failure, sepsis, shock | ARDS changes bilateral ground glass appearance |
Flowchart 1COVID-19 physiotherapy decision-making process
Flowchart 2Physiotherapy pathway for symptomatic COVID-19 patients
COVID awake repositioning/prone protocol (CARP)[22]
| 30 minutes to 2 hours full prone |
| 30 minutes to 2 hours right side lying |
| 30 minutes to 2 hours propped-up sitting |
| 30 minutes to 2 hours left side lying |
| 30 minutes to 2 hours prone |
CARP-Janus General Medicine Resuscitation and Acute Critical Care