Literature DB >> 33280945

Printed titanium implants in UK craniomaxillofacial surgery. Part II: perceived performance (outcomes, logistics, and costs).

A M C Goodson1, S Parmar2, S Ganesh3, D Zakai4, A Shafi5, C Wicks6, R O'Connor7, E Yeung8, F Khalid9, A Tahim10, S Gowrishankar11, A Hills12, E M Williams13.   

Abstract

This second part explores perceptions and understanding of clinical performance, turnaround, and costs for printed titanium implants or plates in common procedures, evaluating both 'in-house' and 'outsourced' CAD-CAM pathways. A cross-sectional study, supported by the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) and a national trainee-led recruitment team, was conducted over 14 weeks. A total of 132 participants took part (demographic data is reported in Part I). For fibular-flap mandibular reconstruction, most participants (69% - 91%) perceived printed titanium as superior to intraoperatively or preoperatively hand-bent plates for surgical duration, accuracy, dental restorability, and aesthetics. There was less agreement about complications and plate-failure risks. Most perceived printed plates to be superior to traditional wafer-based maxillary osteotomy for surgical duration (61%) and maxillary positioning (60%). For orbital floor repair, most perceived improvements in surgical duration (83%, especially higher-volume operators p=0.009), precision (84%), and ease of placement (69%). Rarely (less than 5%) was any outcome rated inferior to traditional techniques for any procedure. Perceived turnaround times and costs were variable, but the greatest consensus was for two-segment fibular-flap reconstructions and orbital floor repair. Industry estimates were generally consistent between two company representatives, but manufacturing-only costs differed when using in-house (departmental) designers. Costs and turnaround times are questionable barriers since few understand 'real-world' figures. Designing in-house can dramatically alter costs. Improved accuracy and surgical duration are common themes but biomechanical benefits are less-well understood. This study paints a picture of the potentially routine applications and benefits of printed titanium, capacity for uptake, understanding amongst surgeons, and areas for improvement.
Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacture; fibular flap, waferless osteotomy, orbital floor repair; patient-specific implants/PSI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33280945     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  2 in total

1.  High-Performance Computing Analysis and Location Selection of Logistics Distribution Center Space Based on Whale Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Lijuan Yang; Xiedong Song
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  Personalized Surgery Service in a Tertiary Hospital: A Method to Increase Effectiveness, Precision, Safety and Quality in Maxillofacial Surgery Using Custom-Made 3D Prostheses and Implants.

Authors:  Jorge Pamias-Romero; Joan Masnou-Pratdesaba; Manel Sáez-Barba; Alba de-Pablo-García-Cuenca; Sahyly Siurana-Montilva; Anna Sala-Cunill; Victòria Valls-Comamala; Rosa Pujol-Pina; Coro Bescós-Atín
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.