Literature DB >> 33279909

Pedunculopontine Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinsonian Disorders: A Case Series.

Viswas Dayal1, Ali Rajabian2, Marjan Jahanshahi2, Iciar Aviles-Olmos2, Dorothy Cowie2, Amy Peters2, Brian Day2, Jonathan Hyam2, Harith Akram2, Patricia Limousin2, Marwan Hariz2,3, Ludvic Zrinzo2, Thomas Foltynie2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) has been investigated for the treatment of levodopa-refractory gait dysfunction in parkinsonian disorders, with equivocal results so far.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the clinical outcomes of PPN-DBS-treated patients at our centre and elicit any patterns that may guide future research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and post-operative objective overall motor and gait subsection scores as well as patient-reported outcomes were recorded for 6 PPN-DBS-treated patients, 3 with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 3 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Electrodes were implanted unilaterally in the first 3 patients and bilaterally in the latter 3, using an MRI-guided MRI-verified technique. Stimulation was initiated at 20-30 Hz and optimized in an iterative manner.
RESULTS: Unilaterally treated patients did not demonstrate significant improvements in gait questionnaires, UPDRS-III or PSPRS scores or their respective gait subsections. This contrasted with at least an initial response in bilaterally treated patients. Diurnal cycling of stimulation in a PD patient with habituation to the initial benefit reproduced substantial improvements in freezing of gait (FOG) 3 years post-operatively. Among the PSP patients, 1 with a parkinsonian subtype had a sustained improvement in FOG while another with Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) did not benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: PPN-DBS remains an investigational treatment for levodopa-refractory FOG. This series corroborates some previously reported findings: bilateral stimulation may be more effective than unilateral stimulation; the response in PSP patients may depend on the disease subtype; and diurnal cycling of stimulation to overcome habituation merits further investigation.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Freezing of gait; Parkinson’s disease; Pedunculopontine nucleus; Progressive supranuclear palsy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33279909     DOI: 10.1159/000511978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evolving concepts in progressive supranuclear palsy and other 4-repeat tauopathies.

Authors:  Maria Stamelou; Gesine Respondek; Nikolaos Giagkou; Jennifer L Whitwell; Gabor G Kovacs; Günter U Höglinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  The Application of Deep Brain Stimulation for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yafei Wen; Bin Jiao; Yafang Zhou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Deep Brain Stimulation and Microelectrode Recording for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Joshua Fejeran; Frank Salazar; Cesia M Alvarez; Faisal R Jahangiri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.