Literature DB >> 33279304

Ductal Prostate Cancers Demonstrate Poor Outcomes with Conventional Therapies.

Weranja Ranasinghe1, Daniel D Shapiro1, Hyunsoo Hwang1, Xuemei Wang1, Chad A Reichard2, Mohamed Elsheshtawi1, Mary F Achim1, Tharakeswara Bathala1, Chad Tang1, Ana Aparicio1, Shi-Ming Tu1, Nora Navone1, Timothy C Thompson1, Louis Pisters1, Patricia Troncoso1, John W Davis1, Brian F Chapin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DAC) is a rare, aggressive, histologic variant of prostate cancer that is treated with conventional therapies, similar to high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of men undergoing definitive therapy for DAC or high-risk PAC and to explore the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in improving the outcomes of DAC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center retrospective review of all patients with cT1-4/N0-1 DAC from 2005 to 2018 was performed. Those undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RTx) for DAC were compared with cohorts of high-risk PAC patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 228 men with DAC were identified; 163 underwent RP, 34 underwent RTx, and 31 had neoadjuvant therapy prior to RP. In this study, 163 DAC patients and 155 PAC patients undergoing RP were compared. Similarly, 34 DAC patients and 74 PAC patients undergoing RTx were compared. DAC patients undergoing RP or RTx had worse 5-yr MFS (75% vs 95% and 62% vs 93%, respectively, p < 0.001) and 5-yr OS (88% vs 97% and 82% vs 100%, respectively, p < 0.05) compared with PAC patients. In the 76 men who received adjuvant/salvage ADT after RP, DAC also had worse MFS and OS than PAC (p < 0.01). A genomic analysis revealed that 10/11 (91%) DACs treated with ADT had intrinsic upregulation of androgen-resistant pathways. Further, none of the DAC patients (0/15) who received only neoadjuvant ADT prior to RP had any pathologic downgrading. The retrospective nature was a limitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Men undergoing RP or RTx for DAC had worse outcomes than PAC patients, regardless of the treatment modality. Upregulation of several intrinsic resistance pathways in DAC rendered ADT less effective. Further evaluation of the underlying biology of DAC with clinical trials is needed. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This study demonstrated worse outcomes among patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate than among high-grade prostate adenocarcinoma patients, regardless of the treatment modality.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen deprivation therapy; Ductal prostate cancer; Localized; Neoadjuvant; Outcomes; Radical prostatectomy; Radiotherapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33279304     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Maria Destouni; Andreas C Lazaris; Vasiliki Tzelepi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weranja Ranasinghe; Daniel D Shapiro; Miao Zhang; Tharakeswara Bathala; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; Chad Tang; John W Davis; Louis Pisters; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Vasohibin-1 expression as a biomarker of aggressive nature in ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a retrospective cohort study at two centres in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kobayashi; Takeo Kosaka; Shuji Mikami; Tokuhiro Kimura; Hiroshi Hongo; Michio Kosugi; Yasufumi Sato; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James G Kench; Mahul B Amin; Daniel M Berney; Eva M Compérat; Ian A Cree; Anthony J Gill; Arndt Hartmann; Santosh Menon; Holger Moch; George J Netto; Maria R Raspollini; Mark A Rubin; Puay Hoon Tan; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Samra Turjalic; Theo H van der Kwast; Ming Zhou; John R Srigley
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 7.778

5.  Ductal and acinar components of mixed prostatic adenocarcinoma frequently have a common clonal origin.

Authors:  Claes Lindh; Hemamali Samaratunga; Brett Delahunt; Rebecka Bergström; Venkatesh Chellappa; John Yaxley; Johan Lindberg; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.012

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.