Literature DB >> 33278935

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Javier Cortes1, David W Cescon2, Hope S Rugo3, Zbigniew Nowecki4, Seock-Ah Im5, Mastura Md Yusof6, Carlos Gallardo7, Oleg Lipatov8, Carlos H Barrios9, Esther Holgado10, Hiroji Iwata11, Norikazu Masuda12, Marco Torregroza Otero13, Erhan Gokmen14, Sherene Loi15, Zifang Guo16, Jing Zhao16, Gursel Aktan16, Vassiliki Karantza16, Peter Schmid17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed durable antitumour activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We aimed to examine whether the addition of pembrolizumab would enhance the antitumour activity of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, done in 209 sites in 29 countries, we randomly assigned patients 2:1 with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using a block method (block size of six) and an interactive voice-response system with integrated web-response to pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel; paclitaxel; or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) or placebo plus chemotherapy. Randomisation was stratified by type of on-study chemotherapy (taxane or gemcitabine-carboplatin), PD-L1 expression at baseline (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1 or <1), and previous treatment with the same class of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting (yes or no). Eligibility criteria included age at least 18 years, centrally confirmed triple-negative breast cancer; at least one measurable lesion; provision of a newly obtained tumour sample for determination of triple-negative breast cancer status and PD-L1 status by immunohistochemistry at a central laboratory; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. The sponsor, investigators, other study site staff (except for the unmasked pharmacist), and patients were masked to pembrolizumab versus saline placebo administration. In addition, the sponsor, the investigators, other study site staff, and patients were masked to patient-level tumour PD-L1 biomarker results. Dual primary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival assessed in the PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and intention-to-treat populations. The definitive assessment of progression-free survival was done at this interim analysis; follow-up to assess overall survival is continuing. For progression-free survival, a hierarchical testing strategy was used, such that testing was done first in patients with CPS of 10 or more (prespecified statistical criterion was α=0·00411 at this interim analysis), then in patients with CPS of 1 or more (α=0·00111 at this interim analysis, with partial alpha from progression-free survival in patients with CPS of 10 or more passed over), and finally in the intention-to-treat population (α=0·00111 at this interim analysis). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819518, and is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 9, 2017, and June 12, 2018, of 1372 patients screened, 847 were randomly assigned to treatment, with 566 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 281 patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff, Dec 11, 2019), median follow-up was 25·9 months (IQR 22·8-29·9) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 26·3 months (22·7-29·7) in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Among patients with CPS of 10 or more, median progression-free survival was 9·7 months with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and 5·6 months with placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·86; one-sided p=0·0012 [primary objective met]). Median progression-free survival was 7·6 and 5·6 months (HR, 0·74, 0·61-0·90; one-sided p=0·0014 [not significant]) among patients with CPS of 1 or more and 7·5 and 5·6 months (HR, 0·82, 0·69-0·97 [not tested]) among the intention-to-treat population. The pembrolizumab treatment effect increased with PD-L1 enrichment. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event rates were 68% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 67% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in <1% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 0% in the placebo-chemotherapy group.
INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival versus placebo-chemotherapy among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with CPS of 10 or more. These findings suggest a role for the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33278935     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  270 in total

Review 1.  [Predictive diagnostics for checkpoint inhibitors].

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Wilko Weichert
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  The tale of TILs in breast cancer: A report from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Harry R Haynes; Elizabeth Blackley; Susan Fineberg; Jeffrey Shear; Sophia Turner; Juliana Ribeiro de Freitas; Daniel Sur; Luis Claudio Amendola; Masoumeh Gharib; Amine Kallala; Indu Arun; Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan; Luciana Fujimoto; Luz F Sua; Shi-Wei Liu; Huang-Chun Lien; Pawan Kirtani; Marcelo Balancin; Hicham El Attar; Prerna Guleria; Wenxian Yang; Emad Shash; I-Chun Chen; Veronica Bautista; Jose Fernando Do Prado Moura; Bernardo L Rapoport; Carlos Castaneda; Eunice Spengler; Gabriela Acosta-Haab; Isabel Frahm; Joselyn Sanchez; Miluska Castillo; Najat Bouchmaa; Reena R Md Zin; Ruohong Shui; Timothy Onyuma; Wentao Yang; Zaheed Husain; Karen Willard-Gallo; An Coosemans; Edith A Perez; Elena Provenzano; Paula Gonzalez Ericsson; Eduardo Richardet; Ravi Mehrotra; Sandra Sarancone; Anna Ehinger; David L Rimm; John M S Bartlett; Giuseppe Viale; Carsten Denkert; Akira I Hida; Christos Sotiriou; Sibylle Loibl; Stephen M Hewitt; Sunil Badve; William Fraser Symmans; Rim S Kim; Giancarlo Pruneri; Shom Goel; Prudence A Francis; Gloria Inurrigarro; Rin Yamaguchi; Hernan Garcia-Rivello; Hugo Horlings; Said Afqir; Roberto Salgado; Sylvia Adams; Marleen Kok; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Stefan Michiels; Sandra Demaria; Sherene Loi
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 3.  Emerging role of circulating tumor cells in immunotherapy.

Authors:  Alexey Rzhevskiy; Alina Kapitannikova; Polina Malinina; Arthur Volovetsky; Hamidreza Aboulkheyr Es; Arutha Kulasinghe; Jean Paul Thiery; Anna Maslennikova; Andrei V Zvyagin; Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic biomarkers among pregnant, post-partum and nulliparous women with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Jerzak; Nechama Lipton; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Dina Boles; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Gregory R Pond; Ellen Warner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Clinical trial data and emerging immunotherapeutic strategies: hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Kearney; Julia E McGuinness; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  The evolving landscape of immunotherapy in solid tumors.

Authors:  Jessica M Keilson; Hannah M Knochelmann; Chrystal M Paulos; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Michael C Lowe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  PD-L1 in Breast Cancer: The Road to the Perfect BiomarkerIs Fraught With Uncertainty.

Authors:  Bora Lim
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Arielle L Heeke; Antoinette R Tan
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 9.237

9.  Perspectives in immunotherapy: meeting report from the immunotherapy bridge (December 2nd-3rd, 2020, Italy).

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Carlo Bifulco; Fortunato Ciardiello; Sandra Demaria; Leisha A Emens; Robert Ferris; Silvia C Formenti; Jerome Galon; Samir N Khleif; Tomas Kirchhoff; Jennifer McQuade; Kunle Odunsi; Akash Patnaik; Chrystal M Paulos; Janis M Taube; John Timmerman; Bernard A Fox; Patrick Hwu; Igor Puzanov
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Consensus and Recommendations for the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hesham Elghazaly; Hope S Rugo; Hamdy A Azim; Sandra M Swain; Banu Arun; Matti Aapro; Edith A Perez; Benjamin O Anderson; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Pierfranco Conte; Nagi S El Saghir; Cheng-Har Yip; Marwan Ghosn; Philip Poortmans; Mohamed A Shehata; Armando E Giuliano; Jessica W T Leung; Valentina Guarneri; Joseph Gligorov; Bahadir M Gulluoglu; Hany Abdel Aziz; Mona Frolova; Mohamed Sabry; Charles M Balch; Roberto Orecchia; Heba M El-Zawahry; Sana Al-Sukhun; Khaled Abdel Karim; Alaa Kandil; Ruslan M Paltuev; Meteb Foheidi; Mohamed El-Shinawi; Manal ElMahdy; Omalkhair Abulkhair; Wentao Yang; Adel T Aref; Joaira Bakkach; Nermean Bahie Eldin; Hagar Elghazawy
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.