G Drevin1, N Picard2, N Jousset3, M Briet4, C Abbara5. 1. Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie Pharmacovigilance, CHU Angers, Angers, France; Université d'Angers, Angers, France. Electronic address: Guillaume.drevin@chu-angers.fr. 2. Service de Pharmacologie, Toxicologie et Pharmacovigilance, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France. 3. Université d'Angers, Angers, France; Institut de Médecine légale, CHU Angers, Angers, France. 4. Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie Pharmacovigilance, CHU Angers, Angers, France; Université d'Angers, Angers, France; Laboratoire MitoVasc, UMR INSERM 1083 CNRS 6015, Angers, France. 5. Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie Pharmacovigilance, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In recent years, several publications have demonstrated the interest and the usefulness of pharmacogenetics in forensic toxicology. However, this approach remains namely focused on DNA-based phenotype, which may potentially lead to misinterpretation. Other determinants such as co-medication or physiological parameters may also impact the phenotype. This article aims to highlight the importance of considering such determinants in forensic toxicology, through the original case of a heroin-related fatality. METHOD: Ethanol concentration determination and toxicological screening were performed using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, liquid chromatography with diode array detection and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry detection. CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes were determined by Taqman® real-time PCR analyses. RESULTS: Femoral blood analyses revealed the presence of ethanol, morphine, codeine, venlafaxine (VEN), O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) and N-desmethylvenlafaxine (NDV), paroxetine, and risperidone. 6-acetylmorphine was also identified in urine. VEN, paroxetine and risperidone were quantified at supra-therapeutic or toxic blood concentrations. NDV was not quantified. The metabolic ratio of VEN (ODV to VEN) was exceptionally low (about 0.7). Pharmacogenetics testing showed that the patient was heterozygous for the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele, which predict an intermediate metabolism for CYP2C19. None of the deficient CYP2D6 alleles investigated were identified. Those results suggest an extensive CYP2D6-metabolism phenotype. CONCLUSION: A discrepancy was seen between the results of the genomic evaluation and the observed metabolic ratio of VEN. This tends to exclude a genetic origin and lead us to formulate other hypotheses, such as phenoconversion that may have been induced by drug interaction involving patients' regular medications. Phenoconversion is as a complex phenomenon that leads to genotype-phenotype mismatch without any genetic abnormality particularly described for cytochromes P450 2D6 and 2C19. Although transient, phenoconversion can have a significant impact on the analysis and interpretation of genotype-focused clinical outcomes correlation and in forensic toxicology conclusions.
PURPOSE: In recent years, several publications have demonstrated the interest and the usefulness of pharmacogenetics in forensic toxicology. However, this approach remains namely focused on DNA-based phenotype, which may potentially lead to misinterpretation. Other determinants such as co-medication or physiological parameters may also impact the phenotype. This article aims to highlight the importance of considering such determinants in forensic toxicology, through the original case of a heroin-related fatality. METHOD:Ethanol concentration determination and toxicological screening were performed using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, liquid chromatography with diode array detection and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry detection. CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes were determined by Taqman® real-time PCR analyses. RESULTS: Femoral blood analyses revealed the presence of ethanol, morphine, codeine, venlafaxine (VEN), O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) and N-desmethylvenlafaxine (NDV), paroxetine, and risperidone. 6-acetylmorphine was also identified in urine. VEN, paroxetine and risperidone were quantified at supra-therapeutic or toxic blood concentrations. NDV was not quantified. The metabolic ratio of VEN (ODV to VEN) was exceptionally low (about 0.7). Pharmacogenetics testing showed that the patient was heterozygous for the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele, which predict an intermediate metabolism for CYP2C19. None of the deficient CYP2D6 alleles investigated were identified. Those results suggest an extensive CYP2D6-metabolism phenotype. CONCLUSION: A discrepancy was seen between the results of the genomic evaluation and the observed metabolic ratio of VEN. This tends to exclude a genetic origin and lead us to formulate other hypotheses, such as phenoconversion that may have been induced by drug interaction involving patients' regular medications. Phenoconversion is as a complex phenomenon that leads to genotype-phenotype mismatch without any genetic abnormality particularly described for cytochromes P450 2D6 and 2C19. Although transient, phenoconversion can have a significant impact on the analysis and interpretation of genotype-focused clinical outcomes correlation and in forensic toxicology conclusions.