Literature DB >> 33277405

Risk of serious spinal adverse events associated with epidural corticosteroid injections in the Medicare population.

Efe Eworuke1, Leah Crisafi2, Jiemin Liao3, Sandia Akhtar3, Martha Van Clief4, Judith A Racoosin4, Michael Wernecke3, Thomas E MaCurdy3, Jeffrey A Kelman5, David J Graham4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural corticosteroid injections (ESIs) are widely performed and have an unquantified risk of serious spinal adverse events (SSAEs). We sought to determine the rate of SSAEs following ESI and to compare the rates by spinal level, injection approach and corticosteroid formulation.
METHODS: We included patients enrolled in Medicare parts A and B who had an ESI between 1 January 2009 and 30 September 2015. We identified potential cases as patients with spine-related diagnoses within 3 days after the first eligible ESI. Event categorization as probable, possible or non-case was based on review of medical records. The rates of probable and possible cases were expressed per 1 000 000 patients overall, and by spinal level, injection approach and corticosteroid formulation. A score test was used to compare these rates.
RESULTS: We identified 1 355 957 eligible ESIs during the study period. Of the 110 potential cases, 43 were selected for medical record review and 11 were categorized as probable, yielding a rate of 8.1 per 1 000 000 patients (95% CI 4.5 to 14.5). Risk of SSAEs was statistically higher with cervical/thoracic injections (29.4, 95% CI 12.5 to 68.8) compared with lumbar/sacral injections (5.1, 95% CI 2.3 to 11.0) (p value 0.001). Event rates for lumbar/sacral non-transforaminal injections was 8.8 (95% CI 4.0 to 19.1). Event rates for particulate (7.5, 95% CI 3.9 to 14.2) and non-particulate formulations (13.1, 95% CI 3.6 to 47.9) appeared similar (p value 0.47).
CONCLUSION: Between 2009 and 2015, rates of SSAEs following ESI in the Medicare population were low. Patients receiving cervical/thoracic ESIs were at higher risk of SSAE than those receiving lumbar/sacral ESIs. Event rates were similar for each corticosteroid formulation. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; epidemiology; injections; pain management; regional anesthesia; spinal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33277405     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.128

Review 2.  An update on epidural steroid injections: is there still a role for particulate corticosteroids?

Authors:  Francis T Delaney; Peter J MacMahon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Long-term effectiveness of epidural steroid injections after new episodes of low back pain in older adults.

Authors:  Michele Curatolo; Sean D Rundell; Laura S Gold; P Suri; Janna L Friedly; Sdrj S Nedeljkovic; Richard A Deyo; Judith A Turner; Brian W Bresnahan; Andrew L Avins; Larry Kessler; Patrick J Heagerty; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.651

4.  Spinal intramedullary hematoma presenting years following a cervical epidural injection.

Authors:  Zaid Aljuboori; Brian Williams
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-08-30

5.  Upper limb weakness and importance of immediate pain relief after cervical epidural steroid injections: more questions than answers?

Authors:  Harsha Shanthhanna; Steven P Cohen; Samer Narouze
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.288

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.