Literature DB >> 33277279

Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol.

Janet E Anderson1,2, Karina Aase2, Roland Bal3, Mathilde Bourrier4, Jeffrey Braithwaite5, Kazue Nakajima6, Siri Wiig2, Veslemøy Guise7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Resilient healthcare (RHC) is an emerging area of theory and applied research to understand how healthcare organisations cope with the dynamic, variable and demanding environments in which they operate, based on insights from complexity and systems theory. Understanding adaptive capacity has been a focus of RHC studies. Previous studies clearly show why adaptations are necessary and document the successful adaptive actions taken by clinicians. To our knowledge, however, no studies have thus far compared RHC across different teams and countries. There are gaps in the research knowledge related to the multilevel nature of resilience across healthcare systems and the team-based nature of adaptive capacity.This cross-country comparative study therefore aims to add knowledge of how resilience is enabled in diverse healthcare systems by examining adaptive capacity in hospital teams in six countries. The study will identify how team, organisational and national healthcare system factors support or hinder the ability of teams to adapt to variability and change. Findings from this study are anticipated to provide insights to inform the design of RHC systems by considering how macro-level and meso-level structures support adaptive capacity at the micro-level, and to develop guidance for organisations and policymakers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will employ a multiple comparative case study design of teams nested within hospitals, in turn embedded within six countries: Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. The design will be based on the Adaptive Teams Framework placing adaptive teams at the centre of the healthcare system with layers of environmental, organisational and system level factors shaping adaptive capacity. In each of the six countries, a focused mapping of the macro-level features of the healthcare system will be undertaken by using documentary sources and interviews with key informants operating at the macro-level.A sampling framework will be developed to select two hospitals in each country to ensure variability based on size, location and teaching status. Four teams will be selected in each hospital-one each of a structural, hybrid, responsive and coordinating team. A total of eight teams will be studied in each country, creating a total sample of 48 teams. Data collection methods will be observations, interviews and document analysis. Within-case analysis will be conducted according to a standardised template using a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative coding, and cross-case analysis will be conducted drawing on the Qualitative Comparative Analysis framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The overall Resilience in Healthcare research programme of which this study is a part has been granted ethical approval by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (Ref. No. 8643334 and Ref. No. 478838). Ethical approval will also be sought in each country involved in the study according to their respective regulatory procedures. Country-specific reports of study outcomes will be produced for dissemination online. A collection of case study summaries will be made freely available, translated into multiple languages. Brief policy communications will be produced to inform policymakers and regulators about the study results and to facilitate translation into practice. Academic dissemination will occur through publication in journals specialising in health services research. Findings will be presented at academic, policy and practitioner conferences, including the annual RHC Network meeting and other healthcare quality and safety conferences. Presentations at practitioner and academic conferences will include workshops to translate the findings into practice and influence quality and safety programmes internationally. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health policy; organisation of health services; quality in health care

Year:  2020        PMID: 33277279     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  COVID-19 Pandemic-Revealed Consistencies and Inconsistencies in Healthcare: A Medical and Organizational View.

Authors:  Diana Araja; Uldis Berkis; Modra Murovska
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Exploring the role of leaders in enabling adaptive capacity in hospital teams - a multiple case study.

Authors:  Birte Fagerdal; Hilda Bø Lyng; Veslemøy Guise; Janet E Anderson; Petter Lave Thornam; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Resilient and responsive healthcare services and systems: challenges and opportunities in a changing world.

Authors:  Siri Wiig; Jane K O'Hara
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  The impact of resource limitations on care delivery and outcomes: routine variation, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and persistent shortage.

Authors:  George L Anesi; Meeta Prasad Kerlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Developing Methods to Support Collaborative Learning and Co-creation of Resilient Healthcare-Tips for Success and Lessons Learned From a Norwegian Hospital Cancer Care Study.

Authors:  Inger Johanne Bergerød; Robyn Clay-Williams; Siri Wiig
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.