Literature DB >> 33277046

Cross-contamination events of Campylobacter spp. in domestic kitchens associated with consumer handling practices of raw poultry.

Maria João Cardoso1, Vânia Ferreira1, Mónica Truninger2, Rui Maia3, Paula Teixeira4.   

Abstract

Contaminated poultry is the major vehicle for consumer's exposure to Campylobacter. This study aimed to perceive potential cross-contamination events during preparation of raw poultry that can contribute to the spread of Campylobacter spp. in domestic kitchen environments and to understand consumers' meanings and justifications on preparation of a poultry dish at home. A total of 18 households were visited to observe consumers preparing a recipe that included poultry. Poultry samples and swabs from the kitchen surfaces and utensils, such as kitchen cloth, hand towel, sponge, cutting boards and the sink, were collected before and after food preparation and tested for the presence of Campylobacter spp. Genotypic characterization of 72 Campylobacter spp. isolates was carried out through Pulse-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE). Fourteen chicken samples were contaminated with Campylobacter spp. (77.8%). Twelve consumers (66.6%) washed the chicken meat under running tap water and eight (44.4%) used cutting boards. Also, only five consumers washed their hands properly prior to or during meal preparation. Cross-contamination events were detected in four kitchens, between the raw chicken and two cutting boards, two sinks and one kitchen cloth. The poultry samples presented different levels of contamination (< 4.0 × 101 CFU/g to 2.2 × 103 CFU/g), being some poultry with lower Campylobacter loads the origin of three cross-contamination events during food preparation. Both C. jejuni and C. coli were recovered. Molecular typing by PFGE showed a high diversity among the isolates. There were different explanations for the practice of cleaning and rinsing chicken, but, in general, it is an habit linked to what they have learned from their families. These results highlight the potential for the dissemination of Campylobacter strains in the domestic environment through the preparation of chicken meat and the need to raise awareness among consumers for an appropriate handling of raw poultry in order to decrease the risk of campylobacteriosis.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacteriosis; Chicken meat; Consumer behaviour; Food preparation; ISO 10272; Molecular typing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33277046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  5 in total

1.  Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems.

Authors:  Nânci Santos-Ferreira; Vânia Ferreira; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  From chicken to salad: Cooking salt as a potential vehicle of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes cross-contamination.

Authors:  Ângela Alves; Nânci Santos-Ferreira; Rui Magalhães; Vânia Ferreira; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.652

3.  Campylobacter Bacteriophage Cocktail Design Based on an Advanced Selection Scheme.

Authors:  Severin Michael Steffan; Golshan Shakeri; Corinna Kehrenberg; Elisa Peh; Manfred Rohde; Madeleine Plötz; Sophie Kittler
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  An Investigation into the Critical Factors Influencing the Spread of Campylobacter during Chicken Handling in Commercial Kitchens in China.

Authors:  Honggang Lai; Yuanyue Tang; Fangzhe Ren; Zeng Li; Fengming Li; Chaoyue Cui; Xinan Jiao; Jinlin Huang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-28

5.  Isolation and Characterization of Group III Campylobacter jejuni-Specific Bacteriophages From Germany and Their Suitability for Use in Food Production.

Authors:  Severin Michael Steffan; Golshan Shakeri; Jens Andre Hammerl; Corinna Kehrenberg; Elisa Peh; Manfred Rohde; Claudia Jackel; Madeleine Plotz; Sophie Kittler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.