Literature DB >> 33275955

Sources and transmission routes of campylobacteriosis: A combined analysis of genome and exposure data.

Lapo Mughini-Gras1, Roan Pijnacker2, Claudia Coipan2, Annemieke C Mulder2, Adriana Fernandes Veludo3, Sharona de Rijk2, Angela H A M van Hoek2, Ralph Buij4, Gerard Muskens4, Miriam Koene5, Kees Veldman5, Birgitta Duim6, Linda van der Graaf-van Bloois6, Coen van der Weijden7, Sjoerd Kuiling2, Anjo Verbruggen2, Joke van der Giessen2, Marieke Opsteegh2, Menno van der Voort8, Greetje A A Castelijn8, Franciska M Schets2, Hetty Blaak2, Jaap A Wagenaar6, Aldert L Zomer6, Eelco Franz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the contributions of several animal and environmental sources of human campylobacteriosis and identify source-specific risk factors.
METHODS: 1417 Campylobacter jejuni/coli isolates from the Netherlands in 2017-2019 were whole-genome sequenced, including isolates from human cases (n = 280), chickens/turkeys (n = 238), laying hens (n = 56), cattle (n = 158), veal calves (n = 49), sheep/goats (n = 111), pigs (n = 110), dogs/cats (n = 100), wild birds (n = 62), and surface water (n = 253). Questionnaire-based exposure data was collected. Source attribution was performed using core-genome multilocus sequence typing. Risk factors were determined on the attribution estimates.
RESULTS: Cases were mostly attributed to chickens/turkeys (48.2%), dogs/cats (18.0%), cattle (12.1%), and surface water (8.5%). Of the associations identified, never consuming chicken, as well as frequent chicken consumption, and rarely washing hands after touching raw meat, were risk factors for chicken/turkey-attributable infections. Consuming unpasteurized milk or barbecued beef increased the risk for cattle-attributable infections. Risk factors for infections attributable to environmental sources were open water swimming, contact with dog faeces, and consuming non-chicken/turkey avian meat like game birds.
CONCLUSIONS: Poultry and cattle are the main livestock sources of campylobacteriosis, while pets and surface water are important non-livestock sources. Foodborne transmission is only partially consistent with the attributions, as frequency and alternative pathways of exposure are significant.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Core-genome MLST; Risk factors; Source attribution; Zoonosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33275955     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  10 in total

1.  Longitudinal Changes in Campylobacter and the Litter Microbiome throughout the Broiler Production Cycle.

Authors:  Robert Valeris-Chacin; Bonnie Weber; Timothy J Johnson; Maria Pieters; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Risk factors for campylobacteriosis in Australia: outcomes of a 2018-2019 case-control study.

Authors:  Danielle M Cribb; Liana Varrone; Rhiannon L Wallace; Angus T McLure; James J Smith; Russell J Stafford; Dieter M Bulach; Linda A Selvey; Simon M Firestone; Nigel P French; Mary Valcanis; Emily J Fearnley; Timothy S Sloan-Gardner; Trudy Graham; Kathryn Glass; Martyn D Kirk
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Comparative Analysis of L-Fucose Utilization and Its Impact on Growth and Survival of Campylobacter Isolates.

Authors:  Pjotr S Middendorf; Wilma F Jacobs-Reitsma; Aldert L Zomer; Heidy M W den Besten; Tjakko Abee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  A restatement of the natural science evidence base regarding the source, spread and control of Campylobacter species causing human disease.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; Sarah O'Brien; Nicola Williams; Javier Guitian; Andrew Grant; Alison Cody; Frances Colles; Jean-Charles Buffet; Ella Adlen; Andrea Stephens; H Charles J Godfray; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Contamination Sources and Transmission Routes for Campylobacter on (Mixed) Broiler Farms in Belgium, and Comparison of the Gut Microbiota of Flocks Colonized and Uncolonized with Campylobacter.

Authors:  Karolien Hertogs; Annelies Haegeman; Dries Schaumont; Philippe Gelaude; Lieven De Zutter; Jeroen Dewulf; Marc Heyndrickx; Geertrui Rasschaert
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Association of Broiler Litter Microbiome Composition and Campylobacter Isolation.

Authors:  Robert Valeris-Chacin; Maria Pieters; Haejin Hwang; Timothy J Johnson; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Investigating the Campylobacter enteritis winter peak in Germany, 2018/2019.

Authors:  Bettina M Rosner; Martyna Gassowski; Stefan Albrecht; Klaus Stark
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Campylobacter in Wild Birds: Is It an Animal and Public Health Concern?

Authors:  Nejash A Ahmed; Timur Gulhan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Lauren K Hudson; William E Andershock; Runan Yan; Mugdha Golwalkar; Nkuchia M M'ikanatha; Irving Nachamkin; Linda S Thomas; Christina Moore; Xiaorong Qian; Richard Steece; Katie N Garman; John R Dunn; Jasna Kovac; Thomas G Denes
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-11-05

10.  A statistical modelling approach for source attribution meta-analysis of sporadic infection with foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  Lapo Mughini-Gras; Elisa Benincà; Scott A McDonald; Aarieke de Jong; Jurgen Chardon; Eric Evers; Axel A Bonačić Marinović
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.954

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.