Literature DB >> 33275188

Real-world study of direct medical and indirect costs and time spent in healthcare in patients with chronic graft versus host disease.

Frida Schain1,2,3, Nurgul Batyrbekova4,5, Johan Liwing6,7, Simona Baculea8, Thomas Webb8, Mats Remberger9, Jonas Mattsson10,11,12.   

Abstract

Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is a debilitating and costly complication following haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study describes the economic burden associated with cGVHD. Direct costs associated with specialised healthcare utilisation (inpatient admissions and outpatient visits), as well as indirect costs associated with sickness absence-associated productivity loss were estimated in patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT in Sweden between 2006 and 2015, linking population-based health and economic registers. To capture the period of chronic GVHD, patients were included who survived > 182 days post-HSCT (start of follow-up), and cGVHD was classified based on patient treatment records to correct for any diagnosis underreporting. Patients were classified as 'non-cGVHD' if they received no immunosuppressive treatment, 'mild cGVHD' if they received only systemic corticosteroid treatment or immunosuppressive treatment, or 'moderate-severe cGVHD' if they received extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) only, corticosteroid treatment and immunosuppressive treatment, or systemic corticosteroid treatment and ECP treatments. Patients with moderate-severe cGVHD spent more time in healthcare, had higher healthcare resource costs and higher sickness absence-related productivity loss compared to patients with non- or mild cGVHD. The cumulative total costs during the first 3 years of follow-up were EUR 14,887,599, EUR 20,544,056, and EUR 47,811,835 for non-, mild, and moderate-severe groups, respectively. The long-term costs incurred with cGVHD following HSCT continue to be very high and significantly impacted by cGVHD severity. This study adds real-world health resource and economic insight relevant for policy-makers and healthcare providers when considering the clinical challenge of balancing immunosuppression to reduce cGVHD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic graft versus host disease; Direct medical costs; Economic burden; Indirect costs; Sweden

Year:  2020        PMID: 33275188      PMCID: PMC7822787          DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01249-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  34 in total

1.  Validation of psoriasis severity classification based on use of topical or systemic treatment.

Authors:  A Egeberg; M Gyldenløve; C Zachariae; L Skov
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Including intangible costs into the cost-of-illness approach: a method refinement illustrated based on the PM2.5 economic burden in China.

Authors:  Bangzhu Zhu; Runzhi Pang; Julien Chevallier; Yi-Ming Wei; Dinh-Tri Vo
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  Validation of National Institutes of Health global scoring system for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) according to overall and GVHD-specific survival.

Authors:  Joon Ho Moon; Sang Kyun Sohn; Anna Lambie; Laura Ellis; Nada Hamad; Jieun Uhm; Vikas Gupta; Jeffrey H Lipton; Hans A Messner; John Kuruvilla; Dennis Kim
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Recognizing and managing chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Mary E D Flowers
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2008

Review 5.  The cost-effectiveness of stem cell transplantations from unrelated donors in adult patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  Vania Costa; Maurice McGregor; Pierre Laneuville; James M Brophy
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 6.  Current issues in chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Gérard Socié; Jerome Ritz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Treatment-resistant depression as risk factor for substance use disorders-a nation-wide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Philip Brenner; Lena Brandt; Gang Li; Allitia DiBernardo; Robert Bodén; Johan Reutfors
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity worldwide in 2012 and a SWOT analysis of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group including the global survey.

Authors:  D Niederwieser; H Baldomero; J Szer; M Gratwohl; M Aljurf; Y Atsuta; L F Bouzas; D Confer; H Greinix; M Horowitz; M Iida; J Lipton; M Mohty; N Novitzky; J Nunez; J Passweg; M C Pasquini; Y Kodera; J Apperley; A Seber; A Gratwohl
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Cost of illness and economic burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Carl Rudolf Blankart; Taika Koch; Roland Linder; Frank Verheyen; Jonas Schreyögg; Tom Stargardt
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Young patients with risk factors prevalent in the elderly - differences in comorbidity depending on severity of psoriasis: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Swedish health registers.

Authors:  Mohammadhossein Hajiebrahimi; Marie Linder; David Hägg; Ina Anveden Berglind; Sean McElligott; Valgard Sverrir Valgardsson; Reginald Villacorta; Anders Sundström
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are We Making PROGRESS in Preventing Graft-versus-Host Disease and Improving Clinical Outcomes? Impact of BMT CTN 1301 Study Results on Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Betty K Hamilton; Corey Cutler; Clint Divine; Mark Juckett; Charles LeMaistre; Susan Stewart; Jennifer Wilder; Mary Horowitz; Nandita Khera; Linda J Burns
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-05-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.