Literature DB >> 33275112

A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Views: A Triple Crossover Trial of Visual Abstracts to Examine Their Impact on Research Dissemination.

Sandra Oska1, Edgar Lerma2,3, Joel Topf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A visual abstract is a graphic summary of a research article's question, methods, and major findings. Although they have a number of uses, visual abstracts are chiefly used to promote research articles on social media.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if the use of visual abstracts increases the visibility of nephrology research shared on Twitter.
METHODS: A prospective case-control crossover study was conducted using 40 research articles published in the American Journal of Nephrology (AJN). Each article was shared by the AJN Twitter account in 3 formats: (1) the article citation, (2) the citation with a key figure from the article, and (3) the citation with a visual abstract. Tweets were spaced 2 weeks apart to allow washout of the previous tweet, and the order of the tweets was randomized. Dissemination was measured via retweets, views, number of link clicks, and Altmetric scores.
RESULTS: Tweets that contained a visual abstract had more than twice as many views as citation-only tweets (1351, SD 1053 vs 639, SD 343) and nearly twice as many views as key figure tweets (1351, SD 1053 vs 732, SD 464). Visual abstract tweets had 5 times the engagements of citation-only tweets and more than 3.5 times the engagements of key figure tweets. Visual abstract tweets were also associated with greater increases in Altmetric scores as compared to citation-only tweets (2.20 vs 1.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of visual abstracts increased visibility of research articles on Twitter, resulting in a greater number of views, engagements, and retweets. Visual abstracts were also associated with increased Altmetric scores as compared to citation-only tweets. These findings support the broader use of visual abstracts in the scientific community. Journals should consider visual abstracts as valuable tools for research dissemination. ©Sandra Oska, Edgar Lerma, Joel Topf. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Twitter; dissemination; science communication; social media; visual abstract

Year:  2020        PMID: 33275112     DOI: 10.2196/22327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  13 in total

1.  JGME Invites Visual Abstracts for Accepted Research Papers.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan; Kenneth Warren Foster; Deborah Simpson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Infographics and Visual Abstracts.

Authors:  Shreya P Trivedi; Alvin Chin; Andrew Ibrahim; Amy Ou
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

Review 3.  The Role of Visual Abstracts in the Dissemination of Medical Research.

Authors:  Beverley C Millar; Michelle Lim
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Users' passivity in accessing digested scientific evidence through social media: cross-sectional insights.

Authors:  Gabriela M Machado; Mariana M Braga
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  What's in a tweet? Optimizing social media impressions.

Authors:  Ralph Grauer; Dallin Busby; Emily Neckonoff; Mani Menon; Ketan Badani
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  The use of forest plot to identify article similarity and differences in characteristics between journals using medical subject headings terms: A protocol for bibliometric study.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Yan; Tsair-Wei Chien
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Twitter Mentions Influence Academic Citation Count of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Publications.

Authors:  Suleiman Sudah; Robert D Faccone; Matthew H Nasra; David Constantinescu; Mariano E Menendez; Allen Nicholson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 8.  Researchers in cardiology - Why and how to get on Twitter?

Authors:  Daniel Benjamin Fyenbo; Tanja Charlotte Frederiksen; Dominik Linz; Thomas Jespersen; Dobromir Dobrev; Gunnar Gislason; Konstanze Betz; Arnela Saljic; Emil Nielsen Holck
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  Bursting out of our bubble: using creative techniques to communicate within the systematic review process and beyond.

Authors:  Jo Thompson Coon; Noreen Orr; Liz Shaw; Harriet Hunt; Ruth Garside; Michael Nunns; Alke Gröppel-Wegener; Becky Whear
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

10.  Visualizing the features of inflection point shown on a temporal bar graph using the data of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sam Yu-Chieh Ho; Tsair-Wei Chien; Yang Shao; Ju-Hao Hsieh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.