| Literature DB >> 33275082 |
Megan Doerr1, Sarah Moore1, Vanessa Barone1, Scott Sutherland2,3, Brian M Bot1, Christine Suver1, John Wilbanks1.
Abstract
Informed consent is the gateway to research participation. We report on the results of the formative evaluation that follows the electronic informed consent process for the All of Us Research Program. Of the nearly 250,000 participants included in this analysis, more than 95% could correctly answer questions distinguishing the program from medical care, the voluntary nature of participation, and the right to withdraw; comparatively, participants were less sure of privacy risk of the program. We also report on a small mixed-methods study of the experience of persons of very low health literacy with All of Us informed consent materials. Of note, many of the words commonly employed in the consent process were unfamiliar to or differently defined by informants. In combination, these analyses may inform participant-centered development and highlight areas for refinement of informed consent materials for the All of Us Research Program and similar studies.Entities:
Keywords: Informed consent; biomedical research; confidentiality and privacy; genetic research; human subjects research; research ethics
Year: 2020 PMID: 33275082 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1847214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AJOB Empir Bioeth ISSN: 2329-4515