| Literature DB >> 33273931 |
Iman Zakavi1, Shila Nayebifar2, Elham Ghasemi3, Aliasghar Valipour1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of supplements, herbal extracts, and exercise training for treatment of diseases and reducing chronic inflammation has been increased progressively among people. Thus, the aim of this investigation was to study the combined aquatic extract of Ferulago angulata boiss with aerobic exercise on pro-inflammatory indices in obese males.Entities:
Keywords: Ferulago angulata extract; interleukins; obesity; training; tumor necrosis factor alpha
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273931 PMCID: PMC7698370 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_475_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Res Med Sci ISSN: 1735-1995 Impact factor: 1.852
Figure 1Consort flow diagram of the study
Pre- and post-test changes in levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-18, interleukin-1β,and tumor necrosis factor-alpha
| Variables | Groups | Mean±SD | Significant level of | Significant level of ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Post-test | ||||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | Control | 74.74±9.89 | 74.09±9.43 | 0.31 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 71.89±9.48 | 69.26±8.04 | 0.03* | ||
| Training-placebo | 74.23±6.65 | 67.41±7.12 | 0.01* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 77.76±8.81 | 64.33±7.12 | 0.001* | ||
| IL-18 (pg/mL) | Control | 97.37±5.82 | 97.14±7.21 | 0.35 | 0.03* |
| Ferulago extract | 107.92±11.89 | 104.84±9.17 | 0.03* | ||
| Training-placebo | 107.27±11.46 | 101.02±9.23 | 0.02* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 106.12±12.12 | 96.90±9.15 | 0.001* | ||
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | Control | 189.96±23.40 | 190.70±19.95 | 0.18 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 187.98±23.58 | 185.66±18.28 | 0.03* | ||
| Training-placebo | 196.54±25.07 | 189.61±24.12 | 0.02* | ||
| Training-Ferulago | 202.01±19.12 | 188.73±18.65 | 0.001* | ||
| IL-1 (pg/mL) | Control | 3.41±0.40 | 3.52±1.95 | 0.18 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 5.66±2.58 | 4.88±2.28 | 0.03* | ||
| Training-placebo | 5.64±2.07 | 3.14±2.12 | 0.02* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 6.41±2.12 | 3.22±1.65 | 0.001* | ||
*Significant difference in P<0.05. SD=Standard deviation; IL=Interleukin; TNF-α=Tumor necrosis factor alpha; ANOVA=Analysis of variance
Figure 2Between-group differences for interleukin-1. *Significant difference with control group (P < 0.05). **Significant difference with training-placebo (P < 0.05). #Significant difference with training-Ferulago group (P < 0.05)
Figure 4Between-group differences for interleukin-18. *Significant difference with control group (P < 0.05). #Significant difference with training-Ferulago group (P < 0.05)
Pre-posttest changes in weight, body mass index, fat percentage, and waist-to-hip ratio
| Variables | Groups | Mean±SD | Significant Level of | Significant Level of ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||||
| Weight (kg) | Control | 82.61±4.33 | 83.15±4.92 | 0.31 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 83.90±6.85 | 83.51±6.85 | 0.35 | ||
| Training-placebo | 80.90±5.61 | 79.58±5.06 | 0.04* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 84.88±13.86 | 82.06±13.14 | 0.04* | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | Control | 32.37±2.37 | 32.7±2.01 | 0.29 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 32.82±2.47 | 32.65±2.27 | 0.34 | ||
| Training-placebo | 32.91±2.55 | 32.77±2.23 | 0.02* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 34.56±4.94 | 33.38±4.39 | 0.01* | ||
| Fat percentage (%) | Control | 41.74±3.11 | 42.77±2.30 | 0.444 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 41.22±3.52 | 39.91±3.64 | 0.01* | ||
| Training-placebo | 41.9±4.48 | 40.47±4.78 | 0.008* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 34.56±4.94 | 33.38±4.39 | 0.01* | ||
| WHR | Control | 0.98±0.03 | 0.98±0.02 | 0.22 | 0.001* |
| Ferulago extract | 0.99±0.04 | 0.96±0.02 | 0.004* | ||
| Training-placebo | 0.99±0.04 | 0.96±0.04 | 0.003* | ||
| Training-ferulago | 1.01±0.07 | 0.98±0.06 | 0.001* | ||
*Significant difference in P<0.05. SD=Standard deviation; ANOVA=Analysis of variance, BMI=Body mass index; WHR=Waist-to-hip ratio
Pre- and post-test changes in calorie and macronutrients’ intake between groups
| Groups | Mean±SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||||
| Energy (Kcal) | Train+ supplement | 1925.5±100.32 | 1920.5±99.32 | ||
| Train | 1933.5±12.34 | 1910.5±34.34 | 0.32 | 0.76 | |
| Supplement | 1890.5±19.05 | 1897.5±10.54 | |||
| Control | 1854.5±14.76 | 1900.5±10.01 | |||
| Carbohydrate (g) | Train+ supplement | 12.45±156.5 | 11.03±136.31 | ||
| Train | 12.32±144.3 | 9.54±140.55 | 0.06 | 0.55 | |
| Supplement | 15.17±165.65 | 11.43±150.6 | |||
| Control | 11.43±155.03 | 7.05±165.00 | |||
| Protein (g) | Train+ supplement | 3.05±76.05 | 1.14±70.54 | ||
| Train | 2.02±64.66 | 4.76±63.06 | 0.12 | 0.21 | |
| Supplement | 2.23±77.76 | 2.09±69.06 | |||
| Control | 1.87±66.88 | 1.11±69.08 | |||
| Total fat (g) | Train+ supplement | 1.05±67.87 | 1.32±67.09 | ||
| Train | 2.43±63.5 | 2.76±60.06 | 0.20 | 0.43 | |
| Supplement | 3.22±67.07 | 2.86±59.99 | |||
| Control | 2.21±67.66 | 2.92±69.09 | |||
SD=Standard deviation