| Literature DB >> 33273679 |
Batool Fatima1, Dilshad Hussain2, Adeela Saeed3, Muhammad Salman Sajid4, Saadat Majeed4, Rahat Nawaz4, Muhammad Naeem Ashiq4, Muhammad Najam-Ul-Haq5, Rubaida Mehmood6.
Abstract
The tellurium doped zinc imidazole framework (Te@ZIF-8) is prepared by a two-step hydrothermal strategy for the electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide. Material is characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The electrochemical characterization of the MOF modified electrode is done by a three-electrode system. Electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide is made by cyclic voltammetry, amperometry, and impedance measurements. Results demonstrate that Te@ZIF-8 shows a detection limit of 60 µM with linearity up to 0.98855. Material is stable to 1000 cycles with no significant change in electrochemical response. Amperometry depicts the recovery of hydrogen peroxide from human serum up to 101%. Impedance curve reveals the surface of Te@ZIF-8-GCE (glassy carbon electrode) as porous and rough and an interface is developed between analyte ions and the sensing material. Finally, the modified electrode is used for the quantitative determination of hydrogen peroxide from serum samples of pancreatic cancer patients, diagnosed with CA 19-9.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273679 PMCID: PMC7713350 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78115-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of Te@ZIF-8 (A) TEM, (B) EDS, (C) XRD, and (D) TGA analysis.
Figure 2Impedance response of hydrogen peroxide on Te@ZIF-8-GCE.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammograms showing the effect of (A) concentration, (C) pH, and (E) scan rate, and their calibration curves (B,D, and F respectively) on Te@ZIF-8-GCE for the detection of hydrogen peroxide at a potential window of − 0.4 V to + 1.4 V.
Figure 4(a) Cyclic voltammogram of hydrogen peroxide with Te@ZIF-8-GCE at 100 cycles and (b) 1000 cycles.
Figure 5(A) Amperometric response of Te@ZIF-8-GCE upon successive addition of hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 M PBS of pH 7 at potential − 0.5 V to + 0.5 V. (B) Corresponding linear graph.
Recoveries of hydrogen peroxide from human serum by Te@ZIF-8-GCE.
| Samples | Added conc. (mM) | Found conc. (mM) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0.93 | 93 |
| 2 | 5 | 4.81 | 96.2 |
| 3 | 10 | 9.69 | 96.9 |
| 4 | 15 | 14.77 | 98.5 |
| 5 | 20 | 19.93 | 99.6 |
| 6 | 25 | 25.11 | 100.3 |
| 7 | 30 | 30.36 | 101.6 |
Levels of CA 19-9 (obtained from Elecsys CA 19-9 Assay) and hydrogen peroxide (calculated after sensing by Te@ZIF-8-GCE) from serum samples of pancreatic cancer patients.
| No. | CA 19-9 (units mL−1) | Current (µA) | Conc. (µM) | Scan rate (mV/s) | Potential (V) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6 | 1.05 | 0.15 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 2 | 30.0 | 2.66 | 0.39 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 3 | 35.5 | 7.1 | 1.04 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 4 | 67.37 | 9.8 | 1.44 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 5 | 91.2 | 11.68 | 1.71 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 6 | 92.6 | 16.01 | 2.35 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |
| 7 | 189 | 18.20 | 2.67 | 0.01 | − 0.4 to + 0.8 |