Literature DB >> 33273616

Marker assisted improvement of low soil phosphorus tolerance in the bacterial blight resistant, fine-grain type rice variety, Improved Samba Mahsuri.

H K Mahadeva Swamy1,2, M Anila1, R R Kale1, G Rekha1, V P Bhadana1,3, M S Anantha1, P Brajendra1, C H Balachiranjeevi1, S K Hajira1, B Laxmi Prasanna4, K Pranathi1, T Dilip1, M B V N Kousik1, G Harika1, K Surekha1, R Mahender Kumar1, C Cheralu4, V Gouri Shankar4, G S Laha1, M S Prasad1, L V Subba Rao1, M S Madhav1, S M Balachandran1, R M Sundaram5.   

Abstract

Improved-Samba-Mahsuri (ISM), a high-yielding, popular bacterial blight resistant (possessing Xa21, xa13, and xa5), fine-grain type, low glycemic index rice variety is highly sensitive to low soil phosphorus (P). We have deployed marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) approach for targeted transfer of Pup1, a major QTL associated with low soil P tolerance, using Swarna as a donor. A new co-dominant marker, K20-1-1, which is specific for Pup1 was designed and used for foreground selection along with functional markers specific for the bacterial blight resistance genes, Xa21, xa13, and xa5. A set of 66 polymorphic SSR marker were used for the background selection along with a pair of flanking markers for the recombination selection in backcross derived progenies and in BC2F2 generation, 12 plants, which are homozygous for Pup1, all the three bacterial blight resistance genes and possessing agro-morphological traits equivalent to or better than ISM were selected and selfed to produce BC2F3s. They were evaluated in plots with low soil P and normal soil P at ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad for their low soil P tolerance, and bacterial blight resistance and superior lines were advanced to BC2F6. One of the lines, when tested at multiple locations in India was found promising under both normal as well as low soil P conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33273616      PMCID: PMC7713241          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78186-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Rice, one of the most important staple food crops of the globe, which is being grown in more than 117 countries, provides more than one-fifth of the calories and is consumed by more than 3 billion people. Having the highest area under rice cultivation (43.39 million hectares), one-fourth (22%, i.e. 104.3 million tonnes) of the world’s rice is produced in India, with average productivity of 2.40 tonnes ha−1[1]. The crop is adversely affected by numerous biotic and abiotic stress factors. Among the abiotic stresses, drought, salinity, and nutrient deficiency are the most important. Among the nutrients which are deficient in rice soils, phosphorus (P) is one of the most vital macronutrients that is required for proper growth and development of the rice plant and its poor availability in the soil is one of the major yield-limiting factors in rice production[2]. Global demand for P fertilizer is increasing continuously, whereas global commercial phosphate reserves are estimated to be depleted within a few decades[3,4] and no known substitute for P is available presently[5,6]. In India, the soils are either low (49.3% of soils) or medium (48.8% of soils) in terms of available P[7,8] and this necessitates the country to import the phosphorus-based fertilizers in a larger scale with 90% dependency[9,10]. It is therefore imperative that one should be ready with alternative solutions for this problem, e.g. better crop residue management, adoption of integrated nutrient management and development of low soil P tolerant rice varieties to manage the low soil P problem. Genetic improvement of the tolerance of rice to P-limiting soils need to be one of the focal areas of research and development in rice to minimize the application of phosphatic fertilizers, which is not only necessary for increasing farmers income by saving on the cost of fertilizers but also to sustain the rice production. Significant variability is available for P use efficiency/low soil P tolerance among the rice genotypes[11-13]. Identification of Pup1 QTL, which confers tolerance to low soil P[2] and the better performance of Pup1 containing rice lines in different genetic backgrounds in both upland and irrigated conditions[14] opens the way to improve the rice cultivars for low soil P conditions. The Pup1 QTL has been fine-mapped[15,16] and closely linked markers have been developed[18]. Using these markers, Pup1 has been introgressed through marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) into the rice varieties-IR-64, IR-72, Dodokan, Batur, and Situ[14]. Further, Pup1 has been cloned and the candidate gene underlying the QTL has been identified as OsPSTOL1[17]. As Pup1 is known to improve tolerance to low soil P in both irrigated and upland rice varieties and, availability of closely linked and functional markers for Pup1, motivated us to genetically improve the tolerance level of the elite, low P sensitive, high-yielding, bacterial blight resistant, fine-grain type Indian rice variety with low glycemic index, Improved Samba Mahsuri (ISM) through the strategy of MABB.

Results

Development of new co-dominant marker for Pup1 from the CAPS marker K20-1

A multiple sequence alignment of sequence derived from the amplified products of K20-1 of Vandana (Low P tolerant and processing Pup1), Improved Samba Mahsuri (Low soil P sensitive and devoid of Pup1) along with Kasalath reference sequence corresponding to Pup1 region and Japonica genome sequence (i.e. Nipponbare sequence) from 12th chromosome of IRGSP pseudomolecule release 5 was done in ClustalW. A 3-bp indel was observed between Vandana and ISM and also between Kasalath and Nipponbare. A new co-dominant marker, named K20-1-1, was designed targeting the conserved regions flanking the indel (Supplementary Fig. 1) using primer3 software. The primer sequence of the newly developed marker and physical positions are given in Table 1; Supplementary Fig. 1. The newly developed marker, produced an amplicon of size 89-bp in the low P tolerant varieties, viz., Kasalath and Vandana, while an amplicon of size 92-bp was amplified in the sensitive rice variety, viz., ISM, when resolved in 8% native PAGE (Supplementary Fig. 1). The newly developed marker, K20-1-1 was tested in a F2 population consisting of 135 individuals derived from the cross Improved Samba Mahsuri/Swarna. The marker showed perfect co-segregation with trait phenotype, wherein all the 103 tolerant F2 plants were observed to amplify the tolerant allele with respect to the newly developed marker in either homozygous or heterozygous condition and all the sensitive F2 plants (n = 32) amplified the fragment which is specific for the sensitive allele (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Table 1

Primer sequences and physical positions of markers K20-1 and K20-1-1.

Primer namePrimer sequenceAmplicon sizePhysical location (Mb) in Kasalath AB458444.1Physical Location (Mb) in Nipponbare (Japonica), 12th Chromosome
KN
K20-1FTCAGGTGATGGGAATCATTG240243169,881–170,12015,410,2542–15,410,496
RTGTTCCAACCAAACAACCTG
K20-1-1FCAGGTGTTCTACACTCCGAAC8992170,032–170,12015,410,405–15,410,496
RTGTTCCAACCAAACAACCTG
K46-1FTGAGATAGCCGTCAAGATGCT523-275,710–276,232Absent
RAAGGACCACCATTCCATAGC
Scheme of MABB followed in the development of ISM-Pup1 NILs. Primer sequences and physical positions of markers K20-1 and K20-1-1. Molecular marker-based foreground, recombinant selections for Pup1 QTL, and the bacterial blight resistance genes, Xa21, xa13, and xa5 in BC1F1 generation. K20-1-1, a co-dominant marker linked to Pup1 and K46-1, a functional marker of Pup1 were used for foreground selection, RM18021 and RM1261 flanking the Pup1 QTL on either side, on 12th chromosome were used for recombinant selection, pTA248, xa13prom, and xa5FM were used for the selection of positive plants for BLB resistance gene Xa21, xa13, and xa5 respectively.

Marker-assisted backcross breeding and foreground, recombinant, and background selection in backcross progenies

Hybridization was carried out between the donor parent Swarna and recipient parent ISM during Rabi (i.e. dry season) 2012–13 and detailed scheme of MABB followed is given in Fig. 1. A total of 29 F1s were genotyped with the co-dominant marker K20-1-1 and 20 plants were identified as true F1s (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The true F1s were then backcrossed with the recipient parent ISM and BC1F1s were produced. A total of 130 BC1F1 plants were subjected to foreground selection using the Pup1 specific functional marker K46-1 and the co-dominant linked marker, K20-1-1 (Fig. 2), and 79 Pup1 positive plants, which are in heterozygous condition (Table 2) were identified. They were then subjected to recombinant selection using the SSR markers flaking Pup1 locus, viz., RM28011 and RM1261 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 3). A total of 11 plants (Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3) possessing a recombination event on one side of Pup1 were identified (i.e. they were homozygous for ISM allele with respect to either RM28011 or RM1261). The foreground and recombinant positive BC1F1s were also screened for the presence of xa5, xa13 and Xa21 using xa5FM, xa13 prom, and pTA248 markers, respectively (Fig. 2). Two BC1F1 plants (viz., #A-13 and #A-54) were observed to be homozygous for all three bacterial blight (BB) genes (Table 2). The 11 plants were also analyzed for their background genome recovery using 66 parental polymorphic SSR markers (Table 2) and plant # A-13 was observed to possess the highest recurrent parent genome recovery of 78.03%. It was then utilized for backcrossing with ISM to generate BC2F1s.
Figure 1

Scheme of MABB followed in the development of ISM-Pup1 NILs.

Table 2

Details of F1 confirmation and foreground selection among the backcross derived plants for Pup.

Details of foreground selection (FS)
Sl. NoCross descriptionGenerationTotal no. of seeds obtainedTotal no. of seeds germinated and survivedTotal no. positive plants (+ ve for Pup1)
1ISM*SwarnaF1352920
2ISM /( ISM*Swarna)BC1F121213079
3ISM //( ISM*Swarna)BC2F123112463
4ISM //( ISM*Swarna) selfedBC2F239223176*
Details of recombinant selection (RS)
Sl. No.GenerationTotal number of plants screenedNumber plants where recombination occurred at RM28011 endNumber plants where recombination occurred at RM1261 end#Total number of plants Selected
1BC1F1795611
2BC2F1634-4
Details of Background selection (BS) and selection for BLB resistance in in BC1F1 generationDetails of percent background genome recovery (%RGP) in selected BC2F2plants
Sl. No.Foreground and Recombinant selection + ve plant #No. of SSR makers screenedNo. of SSR markers which are homozygous for ISM allelesBackground recovery (%)Status for BLB resistance gene
Xa21xa13xa5
1A-5663375.00Xa21/Xa21Xa13/xa13Xa5/xa5
2A-12663173.48Xa21/Xa21xa13/xa13Xa5/xa5
3A-13663778.03Xa21/Xa21xa13/xa13xa5/xa5
4A-16663173.48Xa21/xa21Xa13/xa13xa5/xa5
5A-41663274.24Xa21/Xa21Xa13/xa13Xa5/xa5Sl. No.BC2F2 plants%RGP
6A-54663475.76Xa21/Xa21xa13/xa13xa5/xa5
7A-60663576.52Xa21/Xa21Xa13/xa13Xa5/xa51A-13-144-1291.67
8A-71663274.24Xa21/xa21Xa13/xa13Xa5/xa52A-13-144-5395.45
9A-89663577.27Xa21/xa21Xa13/xa13Xa5/xa53A-13-144-5591.67
10A-113663375.00Xa21/Xa21Xa13/xa13xa5/xa54A-13-144-8293.18
11A-122663274.24Xa21/xa21Xa13/xa13xa5/xa55A-13-144-11293.18
Details of Background selection in BC2F16A-13-144-13594.70
Sl. No.Foreground and Recombinant selection + ve plantNo. of SSR makers screenedNo. of SSR markers which are homozygous for ISM allelesBackground recovery (%)7A-13-144-13995.45
8A-13-144-17094.70
1A-13 -18294684.859A-13-144-19294.70
2A-13-65295087.8810A-13-144-21593.18
3A-13-144295289.3911A-13-144-22293.94
4A-13-192294785.6112A-13-144-22393.18

*In BC2F2 generation the number of plants homozygous for the Pup1 locus, #In BC2F1 no recombinant selection was carried for RM1216 because the plant selected in BC1F1 was already positive/recombine for RM126.

Crosses were made between ISM and Swarna in Rabi 2012–13, F1s obtained were confirmed for their hybridity using a co-dominant marker K 20-1-1. The true F1s were backcrossed to recurrent parent ISM to produce BC1F1. Obtained BC1F1s were subjected to FS and RS, the plants which were positive for FS and RS were genotyped for BLB and also subjected to BS. The best plant selected (A-13) was backcrossed to ISM, to produce BC2F1. The BC2F1s obtained was subjected to FS, RS, and BS, the best plant obtained (A-13-144) was selfeds to produce BC2F2.

Figure 2

Molecular marker-based foreground, recombinant selections for Pup1 QTL, and the bacterial blight resistance genes, Xa21, xa13, and xa5 in BC1F1 generation. K20-1-1, a co-dominant marker linked to Pup1 and K46-1, a functional marker of Pup1 were used for foreground selection, RM18021 and RM1261 flanking the Pup1 QTL on either side, on 12th chromosome were used for recombinant selection, pTA248, xa13prom, and xa5FM were used for the selection of positive plants for BLB resistance gene Xa21, xa13, and xa5 respectively.

Details of F1 confirmation and foreground selection among the backcross derived plants for Pup. *In BC2F2 generation the number of plants homozygous for the Pup1 locus, #In BC2F1 no recombinant selection was carried for RM1216 because the plant selected in BC1F1 was already positive/recombine for RM126. Crosses were made between ISM and Swarna in Rabi 2012–13, F1s obtained were confirmed for their hybridity using a co-dominant marker K 20-1-1. The true F1s were backcrossed to recurrent parent ISM to produce BC1F1. Obtained BC1F1s were subjected to FS and RS, the plants which were positive for FS and RS were genotyped for BLB and also subjected to BS. The best plant selected (A-13) was backcrossed to ISM, to produce BC2F1. The BC2F1s obtained was subjected to FS, RS, and BS, the best plant obtained (A-13-144) was selfeds to produce BC2F2. Performance of Pup1 introgressed lines under low P (< 2 kg ha−1) and normal conditions (> 20 kg ha−1). a: ISM (Recipient/ Recurrent) showing poor growth and Swarna (Donor) and introgressed lines of ISM growing well under low P (< 2 kg ha−1) condition; b1: ISM, Swarna and introgressed lines under low P condition b2: ISM, Swarna and introgressed lines under normal P condition b3: Showing root and shoot length under low P condition; b4: Showing root volume under low P condition; c1: Screening for bacterial blight in the field, c2: Scoring of inoculated leaf. A total of 124 BC2F1 plants were grown and subjected to foreground selection for Pup1 using the marker K20-1-1 and a total of 63 plants were identified to be positive for the locus (Table 2). Positive plants were further genotyped with the flanking marker, RM28011 (as the selected BC1F1 plant, i.e. # A-13 was earlier observed to be homozygous for ISM allele for the other flanking marker RM1261 in BC1F1 generation) in the recombinant selection. Four BC2F1 plants were observed to be homozygous for ISM specific allele with respect to the flanking marker, RM28011 (Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4). These plants (#A-13-18, #A-13-65, #A-13-144 and #A-13-192) were then analyzed for background genome recovery using the remaining 29 parental polymorphic SSR markers (which were still heterozygous for the ISM alleles in the selected BC1F1 plant # A-13; Table 2; Supplementary Fig. 4). The background recovery ranged from 84.85% to 89.23% among selected plants (Table 2) and a single plant #A-13-144 with maximum recurrent parent (ISM) genome recovery of 89.23% was selfed to generate BC2F2s. A total of 231 BC2F2 seedlings were analyzed with the co-dominant marker, K20-1-1, and a total of 76 plants that were homozygous for Pup1 are identified (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 5). Among them, twelve best plants (A-13-144-12, A-13-144-53, A-13-144-55, A-13-144-82, A-13-144-112, A-13-144-135, A-13-144-139, A-13-144-170, A-13-144-192, A-13-144-215, A-13-144-222, A-13-144-223), which were almost similar to the recurrent parent ISM, in terms of agro-morphological traits like plant height, days to fifty percent flowering, panicle length, number of tillers, grain yield, leaf color, grain type and grain hull color were advanced to BC2F3. The twelve BC2F3 lines were planted in both normal P and low P plots of ICAR-IIRR to evaluate their performance under both low as well as normal soil P and also to evaluate their BB resistance along with other agro-morphological features.

Performance of Pup1 introgressed lines under low soil P condition

The twelve best Pup1 introgressed BC2F3 ISM lines identified were evaluated under low P (< 2 kg ha−1) conditions along with the parents and checks. Under low P condition the traits viz., days to fifty percent flowering, number of productive tillers, flag leaf length, panicle length, root volume, dry root weight, dry shoot weight, thousand grain weight and grain yield per plant, showed significant difference among the introgressed lines with improved performance as compared to ISM. No differences were observed among the Pup1 introgressed plants with respect to plant height, flag leaf width, root length and shoot length (Table 3). The introgressed lines were equivalent or superior to the original parent, ISM in respect of all the agro-morphological traits under low soil P condition (Table 3; Fig. 3).
Table 3

Evaluation of the Pup1 positive homozygous BC2F3 lines in the low-P plot of ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad.

Genotype/EntryDays to fifty percent flowering (Days)Plant height (cm)Number of productive tillers (Nos.)Flag leaf length (cm)Flag leaf width (cm)Panicle Length (cm)Root length (cm)Root volume (ml)Dry root weight (g)Dry shoot weight (g)Shoot length (cm)1000 grain weight (g)Grain yield per plant (g)
A-13-144-12125 C64.33 ABC6.67 D16.33 E1.2 AB17.33 E29.5 A31.12 AB2.61 ABCD21.92 A60.52 A12.53 FGH9.85 B
A-13-144-53120 EF63.67 ABC7.33 CD22.33 AB1.167 AB19.67 BC30.5 A28.62 BC2.78 AB21.63 AB60.12 A11.34 I9.95 B
A-13-144-55122 DE65.33 ABC7.33 CD21.33 BC1.2 AB19.33 BC33.25 A32.52 A2.91 A18.91 CD60.53 A14.76 D9.75 B
A-13-144-82125 C66.21 ABC7.33 CD19.67 CD1.1 B18.63 CDE32.61 A31.33 AB2.67 ABCD18.21 D63.22 A13.43 EF7.98 C
A-13-144-112128 B63.67 ABC7.55 CD18.33 DE1.17 AB18.43 CDE30.21 A30.14 AB2.23 E17.74 D60.21 A14 DE7.22 C
A-13-144-135125 C65.67 ABC7.33 CD18.61 DE1.2 AB18.67 CDE34.74 A26.31 C2.61 ABCD18.77 CD60.52 A12.49 FGHI9.65 B
A-13-144-139118 F70.67 AB11.33 A21.67 BC1.33 A21.51 A31.51 A31.2 AB2.49 BCDE20.52 ABC62.33 A13.54 EF12.55 A
A-13-144-170121 DE67.67 ABC8.22 BC20.25 BCD1.3 A20.67AB32.57 A29.51 ABC2.49 BCDE19.45 BCD62.61 A11.76 GHI10.12 B
A-13-144-192122 DE67.67 ABC8.63 BC18.67 DE1.3 A20.33 AB33.54 A26.34 C2.39 CDE15.21 E60.41 A13.13 EFG10.58 B
A-13-144-215122 DE62.15 BCD7.51 CD20.33 BCD1.2 AB19.51 BC30.52 A29.36 ABC2.52 BCDE17.92 D59.53 A13.95 DE7.32 C
A-13-144-222125 C62.32 BCD7.5 CD18.5 DE1.21 AB17.5 DE30.62 A29.63 ABC2.49 BCDE17.33 DE58.84 A12.25 GHI7.58 C
A-13-144-223127 BC71.22 A7.5 CD24.71 A1.25 AB21.33 A31.32 A30.81 AB2.69 ABC21.24 AB63.5 A13.83 E8.42 C
Imp Samba Mahsuri127 BC41.29 F2.33 F12.32 G0.52 D11.31 H21.56 B12.57 DE0.96 G2.45 G37.02 D11.55 I2.59 E
IR-64116 G49.86 E3.41 E14.27 F0.85 C12.92 G20.28 B11.84 E0.47 H2.58 G44.58 C22.785 B2.95 DE
MTU 1010105.5 H55.57 D3.85 E17.08 E0.94 C14.95 F19.67 B14.27 D1.39 F4.53 F51.19 B23.88 A3.425 D
Swarna130 A63.60C8.92 B18.34DE1.22 AB18.67 CD30.49 A28.87 BC2.43 DE18.68 D61.14 A17.86 C9.93 B
MSS Tests

8.79**

(< .0001)

8.82 NS

(0.4057)

1.43**

(0.0014)

4.96**

(0.001)

0.004 NS

(0.3721)

1.88**

(0.0006)

2.53 NS

(0.761)

3.67*

(0.039)

0.032*

(0.036)

3.95**

(0.0008)

2.25 NS

(0.98)

2.29**

(< .0001)

2.51**

(< .0001)

MSS Checks/Controls426.25**(< .0001)

353.51**

(< .0001)

34.37**

(< .0001)

29.57**

(< .0001)

0.34**

(< .0001)

40.38**

(< .0001)

102.17**

(< .0001)

259.5**

(< .0001)

2.79**

(< .0001)

243.70**

(< .0001)

419.09**

(< .0001)

126.69**

(< .0001)

48.64**

(< .0001)

MSS Tests vs

Checks

168.59**(< .0001)

1211.9**

(< .0001)

71.37**

(< .0001)

142.28**

(< .0001)

0.75**

(< .0001)

167.8**

(< .0001)

523.98**

(< .0001)

1133.1**

(< .0001)

10.85**

(< .0001)

989.00**

(< .0001)

1079.3**

(< .0001)

215.52**

(< .0001)

140.29**

(< .0001)

Error0.587.682.600.690.0040.243.911.260.0116.278.570.121.85
CV0.634.757.744.785.852.937.405.015.625.925.442.055.90
CD tests @ 5%2.358.541.432.570.191.50-3.450.322.27-1.051.21
CD Checks vs Tests @ 5%2.358.541.432.570.191.506.103.450.322.279.021.051.21
Mean122.4062.567.0618.921.1418.1729.5626.532.2616.0757.8914.588.11
Standard Error1.461.930.550.760.050.721.181.740.171.661.840.940.72
Minimum105.5041.292.3312.320.5211.3119.6711.840.472.4537.0211.342.59
Maximum130.0071.2211.3324.711.3321.5134.7432.522.9121.9263.5023.8812.55

NS: Non significant; **Highly significant; * Significant; Values under the parenthesis indicate the Probability value (Pr > F); Alphabets in the superscripts indicate LSD grouping.

The entry A-13-144-139 performed best under low P condition, followed by six equally performing genotypes viz., A-13-144-192, A-13-144-170, A-13-144-53, A-13-144-12, A-13-144-55 and A-13-144-135 with Swarna (Donor parent &Tolerant check).

Figure 3

Performance of Pup1 introgressed lines under low P (< 2 kg ha−1) and normal conditions (> 20 kg ha−1). a: ISM (Recipient/ Recurrent) showing poor growth and Swarna (Donor) and introgressed lines of ISM growing well under low P (< 2 kg ha−1) condition; b1: ISM, Swarna and introgressed lines under low P condition b2: ISM, Swarna and introgressed lines under normal P condition b3: Showing root and shoot length under low P condition; b4: Showing root volume under low P condition; c1: Screening for bacterial blight in the field, c2: Scoring of inoculated leaf.

Evaluation of the Pup1 positive homozygous BC2F3 lines in the low-P plot of ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad. 8.79** (< .0001) 8.82 NS (0.4057) 1.43** (0.0014) 4.96** (0.001) 0.004 NS (0.3721) 1.88** (0.0006) 2.53 NS (0.761) 3.67* (0.039) 0.032* (0.036) 3.95** (0.0008) 2.25 NS (0.98) 2.29** (< .0001) 2.51** (< .0001) 353.51** (< .0001) 34.37** (< .0001) 29.57** (< .0001) 0.34** (< .0001) 40.38** (< .0001) 102.17** (< .0001) 259.5** (< .0001) 2.79** (< .0001) 243.70** (< .0001) 419.09** (< .0001) 126.69** (< .0001) 48.64** (< .0001) MSS Tests vs Checks 1211.9** (< .0001) 71.37** (< .0001) 142.28** (< .0001) 0.75** (< .0001) 167.8** (< .0001) 523.98** (< .0001) 1133.1** (< .0001) 10.85** (< .0001) 989.00** (< .0001) 1079.3** (< .0001) 215.52** (< .0001) 140.29** (< .0001) NS: Non significant; **Highly significant; * Significant; Values under the parenthesis indicate the Probability value (Pr > F); Alphabets in the superscripts indicate LSD grouping. The entry A-13-144-139 performed best under low P condition, followed by six equally performing genotypes viz., A-13-144-192, A-13-144-170, A-13-144-53, A-13-144-12, A-13-144-55 and A-13-144-135 with Swarna (Donor parent &Tolerant check).

Performance of Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM under normal soil P condition

Under normal soil P (> 25 kg P ha−1) level, Pup1 introgressed BC2F3 lines were equivalent to the recurrent parent (ISM) in terms of days to fifty percent flowering, plant height, panicle length, shoot length and thousand-grain weight. The lines were observed to show equivalent or better performance as compared to ISM with respect to root volume, dry root weight, dry shoot weight, number of productive tillers, and grain yield (Supplementary Table 1, Fig. 3).

Evaluation of Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM lines for bacterial blight resistance

The Pup1 introgressed BC2F3 lines along with bacterial blight resistant check (ISM) and bacterial blight susceptible check (Samba Mahsuri/ BPT 5204) were inoculated with a local virulent isolate of Xoo, (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) DX-020 under field conditions (i.e. in soil with normal P). All the Pup1 introgressed BC2F3 lines and the recurrent parent, ISM showed resistance reaction (lesion length of < 1 cm/IRRI-SES score of 1; Supplementary Table 2 and Fig. 3), while Samba Mahsuri showed susceptible reaction (Lesion length of 18.5 cm/IRRI-SES score of 9; Supplementary Table 2, Fig. 3).

Evaluation of Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM for grain and cooking quality

Four best BC2F6 Pup1 introgressed ISM lines were evaluated for grain and cooking quality-related traits. The donor Swarna has medium bold type grains, while ISM is of medium-slender type grain. All the Pup1 introgressed lines were observed to possess medium-slender grain and showed values equivalent to ISM in terms of all the grain and cooking quality parameters (Table 4, Supplementary Fig. 6).
Table 4

Grain quality parameters of the Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM.

Grain quality componentGenotypesMeanSE
A-13-144-53A-13-144-170A-13-144-139A-13-144-192SwarnaISM
Milling %66.2066.2066.3064.3062.7064.5065.030.59
Head rice recovery44.6052.0055.8048.5045.8040.4047.852.24
Kernel length4.894.915.065.044.814.514.870.08
Kernel Breadth1.681.801.881.812.111.681.830.07
L/B ratio2.912.722.692.782.272.682.680.09
Volume expansion ratio (mm)5.304.005.005.404.205.104.830.24
Water uptake (ml)150.00155.00155.00165.00175.00155.00159.173.75
Kernel length after cooking (mm)8.808.408.808.607.608.308.420.18
Elongation ratio1.791.711.731.701.581.641.690.03
Alkali spreading value4.004.004.104.004.004.004.020.02
Amylose content (%)21.9124.4822.5522.8523.6722.2022.940.39
Gel consistency (mm)22.0022.0022.0022.0030.0022.0023.331.33
Grain typeMSMSMSMSSBMS--
Grain chalkinessAAAAVOCA--

MS and SB indicate medium slender and short bold respectively; A: Absent, VOC: Very occasionally present.

Grain quality parameters of the Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM. MS and SB indicate medium slender and short bold respectively; A: Absent, VOC: Very occasionally present.

Performance of a Pup1 introgressed line of ISM in multi-location trials

One of the best performing lines of ISM with Pup1 [viz., A-13-144-139 (designated as IET 28061)] was evaluated in multi-location trials of AICRIP in Kharif (i.e. wet season 2018) along with other entries and checks under both 100% and 50% of the recommended dose of phosphorus application at Cuttack (Odisha, India), Maruteru (Andhra Pradesh, India) and Hyderabad (Telangana, India). The line IET 28,061 performed remarkably well and recorded 16% and 30% yield advantage over the ISM under 100% and 50% dose of phosphorus application respectively. Further, the Pup1 introgressed line performed equivalent to the donor parent, Swarna under both conditions (Table 5).
Table 5

Performance of Pup1 introgressed ISM line under AICRIP trials at Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under normal (100% RDF P application) and reduced (50% RDF P application).

Sl. NoTest EntriesYield (in kg/ha)
Odisha (Cuttack)Andhra Pradesh (Maruteru)Telangana (Hyderabad)MeanOdisha# (Cuttack)Andhra Pradesh (Maruteru)Telangana (Hyderabad)Mean
At 100% RDF P applicationAt 50% RDF P application
1A-13-144-139 (IET 28061)ѱ4780*7920*3728$5476.004511*8350*2149$5003.33
2Swarna (Positive Check)3026813030264727.33800525225263.50
3ISM (Negative Check)3733669036624695.003767581019523843.00
Exp. Meanβ3619650239954705.333227626321843891.33
CD665.971604.86375.03452.311405.12327.32
CV%8.7211.644.496.6410.587.01
Percent improvement over ISM (recurrent parent)28.0518.391.8016.6319.7543.7210.0930.19
Percent improvement over Swarna57.96− 2.5823.2015.844.31− 14.79− 4.94

* Statistically Significant (p < 0.05) superior over the ISM; $ numerically superior over the ISM.

# Data was not available for Swarna in Cuttack; the mean values presented in the table represent the mean of 23 entries which are involved in the AICRIP trial at that particular center; ѱ IET 28061 is the evaluation number given to A-13-144-139 derived ISM NIL of Pup1 in AICRIP.

Performance of Pup1 introgressed ISM line under AICRIP trials at Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under normal (100% RDF P application) and reduced (50% RDF P application). * Statistically Significant (p < 0.05) superior over the ISM; $ numerically superior over the ISM. # Data was not available for Swarna in Cuttack; the mean values presented in the table represent the mean of 23 entries which are involved in the AICRIP trial at that particular center; ѱ IET 28061 is the evaluation number given to A-13-144-139 derived ISM NIL of Pup1 in AICRIP.

Discussion

India has the largest area under cultivation of rice (~ 44 M ha) in the world. However, a significant proportion is either P-deficient or with a high P-fixing capacity[31]. The poor availability of P in the soil is one of the major yield-limiting factors in rice production[2]. The yield reduction due to low P can be overcome either by application of P fertilizers or by growing rice varieties which are P use efficient under low P availability. Application of more P fertilizer increases the production costs and associated import demands and also often results in fertilizer run-offs, which pollute the water bodies. Hence, the cultivation of P use efficient rice varieties could be the most economic and eco-friendly option for managing the problem. Rice is known to have significant variability for P uptake and use efficiency[11-13]. A major QTL, named Pup1, conferring tolerance to low soil P was identified[2] and demonstration of better performance of Pup1 containing rice lines[14] indicates the scope for genetically improving the elite rice varieties, which are sensitive to low soil P. ISM is a near-isogenic line of the very popular Indian rice mega-variety, Samba Mahsuri and ISM was earlier developed by our group through MABB by pyramiding three bacterial blight (BB) resistant genes, viz., xa5, xa13 and Xa21. ISM retains the high yield potential and excellent grain quality attributes of Samba Mahsuri[19] and it is steadily replacing Samba Mahsuri in the bacterial blight endemic areas in India and, presently occupying more than 130,000 hectares[32]. However, ISM was observed to be highly sensitive to low soil P in a study conducted at ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad, India in the field plot with low soil P[33]. In order to improve the adoption of ISM in areas with low soil P and to increase the profit of farmers, in the present study, an attempt has been made to improve ISM for low soil P tolerance by targeted introgression of Pup1 QTL through MABB approach. The Pup1 QTL has been identified as the major locus conferring low soil P tolerance and enhanced P uptake in rice[15]. Several markers have been developed for use in marker-assisted introgression of Pup1 QTL into those rice varieties, lacking Pup1[14,18,34]. Most of the markers identified earlier for Pup1, including the functional markers, K46-1 and K46-2 were either dominant or CAPS based co-dominant markers, their deployment is difficult and cumbersome in routine MABB programs. The PCR-based marker K20-1 is located at a distance of 105 kb (i.e. < 1 cM) from the candidate gene for Pup1 (i.e. the gene encoding a PSTOL1[17]). However, the amplicons derived from K20-1 needs to be subjected for restriction digestion with Mse1 enzyme to distinguish tolerant and sensitive alleles in a co-dominant fashion[14]. In order to overcome the limitation of this marker, we amplified and sequenced the product derived from K20-1 among rice genotypes having Pup1 and devoid of Pup1. It resulted in the identification of a unique 3-bp indel polymorphism nearer to reverse primer of K20-1 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Targeting this indel, a new marker, named K20-1-1 was developed and this marker showed a perfect co-segregation with the trait phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 2). The new marker, K20-1-1 is physically located quite close to the Pup1 locus (~ 105 kb; < 1 cM) and was observed to clearly distinguish homozygous and heterozygous individuals with respect to Pup1 as compared to the dominant functional marker, K46-1 ([14]; Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). Hence, we deployed this new marker in the process of marker-assisted introgression of Pup1 into ISM. Crosses were made between ISM and Swarna (the donor variety, possessing Pup1) and the F1s obtained were confirmed with the help of the co-dominant marker K20-1-1. Identification of true F1s using molecular markers is ideal as seeds that are set by accidental selfing which can be identified and removed quickly[35]. The true F1s confirmed through marker analysis were backcrossed to the recipient parent (ISM) to produce BC1F1s. Backcrossing is a method described by Harlan and Pope in 1922[36] and it has been one of the widely used techniques in plant breeding for incorporating one or a few genes/traits into a well-adapted or elite crop variety[37,38]. The efficiency of selection in backcross breeding can be greatly increased by employment of molecular markers[39], and in general, three levels of MABB have been described by Holland[40] and Neeraja et al.[41]. The first level is ‘foreground selection’ where markers are used in combination with or to replace phenotypic screening for the target gene or QTL[42]. In the present study, screening for the target gene was done through initial screening with the Pup1 linked marker K20-1-1. Later, the positive plants were reconfirmed with the Pup1 specific, dominant, functional marker K46-1[14]. As phenotypic screening for low soil P tolerance in field conditions is laborious, hydroponic experiments are not much reliable[14] and no defined criteria are available for screening for low soil P tolerance in segregating progenies, marker-assisted selection for Pup1 is the preferred choice in gene introgression programs. The second level of MABB involves the selection of desirable backcross plants possessing recombination on either one side or both sides of the target gene/QTL through a process called ‘recombinant selection’, with the help of markers flanking the target gene/QTL on either side at a genetic distance of ~ 5 cM[39]. Recombinant selection plays a crucial role in reducing the ‘linkage drag’, as in conventional breeding, the donor segment can tend to remain very large, even after many backcross generations, and hence the backcross plants may have many undesirable genes, which can negatively affect crop performance[43,44]. By using markers that flank the target gene, ‘linkage drag’ associated with the presence of the target gene/QTL can be minimized[39]. In the present study, two SSR markers RM28011 and RM1261, which are flanking the Pup1 on either side (~ 1.5 Mb; equivalent to 5–6 cM) were used for the recombinant selection. In this study, we found only single recombinant events in BC1F1s, as the double recombinant events are rare and the sample size used for selection was also lesser than ideal[45]. In BC2F1, the recombinant selection was done with respect to the marker, RM28011 as the selected positive BC1F1 plant # A-13 already possessed recombination for the marker, RM1261. Thus, by the second backcross generation, plant(s) possessing recombination on either side of Pup1 locus were identified, thus minimizing the linkage drag. The third level of MABB involves ‘background selection’, in which backcross progenies with maximum recurrent parent genome recovery will be selected using markers that are unlinked to the target locus and spread across the entire genome[39]. This is useful as the recovery of the recurrent parent genome can be greatly accelerated and the number of backcrosses can be limited to just two or three[39]. In the present study, 66 rice SSR markers which are polymorphic between the donor and recurrent parents and distributed across the entire rice genome were used for background selection to accelerate the recovery of the recurrent parent genome and by BC2F2, plant(s) possessing a high level of recovery of ISM genome was obtained. In addition to foreground selection for Pup1, marker-assisted selection was also carried out for the three BB resistant genes xa5, xa13 and Xa21 (which are present in ISM) in the first backcross generation. BB resistance is the essential character of the variety ISM and hence it is very crucial to retain this feature of the variety in the process of improving ISM for low P tolerance. The molecular markers, pTA248[24], xa13 prom and xa5FM[25] , which are also functional markers specific to BB resistance genes Xa21, xa13, and xa5 respectively were employed to monitor the segregation of these genes among the backcross plants and by BC1F1, we were able to identify the plants, homozygous for the three bacterial blight resistance genes. Twelve best BC2F2 plants, which were homozygous for Pup1 and the three BB resistance genes and also possessing highest recovery of ISM genome were selfed to generate twelve BC2F3 lines and they were evaluated under low soil P (Available P < 2.0 kg ha−1) as well as under normal P (recommended dose of P application). A delay in flowering was observed in all the rice genotypes under low P condition in comparison to normal condition. The phenological delays have been reported for crop plants when exposed to low P condition[46-48]. It is predicted to be an adaptive mechanism of plants which leads to increased phosphorus acquisition and utilization[49], helping crop plants to attain maximum reproductive biomass. Under the normal condition, all of the Pup1 introgressed ISM lines recorded days to 50% flowering equivalent to ISM (Supplementary Table 1), while under low soil P condition, many introgression lines flowered earlier as compared to ISM (Table 3). This could be because of better uptake of P by Pup1 introgressed ISM lines in the presence of Pup1[14,17], increased phosphorus acquisition, and utilization of P, which could help to overcome the phenological delay noticed under low P condition. A drastic reduction in the plant height, number of productive tillers, flag leaf width, flag leaf length, and panicle length was observed among the low soil P sensitive checks under low P condition in comparison to normal soil P condition. However, the low soil P tolerant check Swarna and the Pup1 introgressed ISM lines did not show such a significant reduction in plant height (Table 3, Supplementary Table 1, and Fig. 3). A comparatively lesser reduction in the plant height, number of productive tillers, flag leaf width, flag leaf length, and panicle length was observed among the introgressed lines and Swarna. The height of the introgression lines was almost similar to ISM under normal condition, while under low P condition, plant height of Pup1 introgressed ISM lines were significantly higher than their recurrent parent ISM. Availability of P significantly affects plant height[50] and the presence of Pup1 in the introgression lines helped them to acquire more P and maintain tissue growth in comparison to ISM under low P condition. The productive tillers and panicle length of Pup1 introgressed ISM lines were significantly higher as compared to ISM under the low soil P condition. Once the plants sense the limited availability of P, they try to shorten their life cycle through early entry into the reproductive phase or delay the flowering to acquire the required threshold P to complete the life cycle. Some plants also change the metabolic machinery to utilize the available P efficiently to complete their life cycle, with few healthy seeds produced for perpetuation, thus resulting in lower tiller number and grain number. In the present study, the presence of Pup1 in the introgression lines might have helped them in acquiring more and more P from the soil due to better foraging ability[14], resulting in more productive tillers and panicle length and better yield under low P condition, as compared to ISM. The root length of Pup1 introgressed lines and tolerant check, Swarna was observed to be significantly better than ISM and other low P sensitive checks (MTU 1010 and IR-64) in the low P plot. Under normal soil P condition, significant differences were not noticed among the Pup1 introgressed rice lines but they varied in comparison to checks analyzed. The root volume, dry root weight, shoot length and dry shoot weight of the Pup1 introgressed lines was observed to be significantly higher as compared to the recipient parent, ISM and other low P sensitive checks (MTU 1010, IR-64) under low P condition (Table 3, Fig. 3). Interestingly, even in the normal soil P condition, the Pup1 introgressed lines showed comparatively better performance for these traits as compared to ISM. Gamuyao et al.[17] demonstrated that Pup1 locus contains a major gene called OsPSTOL1, which greatly enhances the total root length and root surface area, which in turn helped the plants in acquiring more P under deficient condition. Acquisition of more P under low P condition helps the Pup1 introgressed ISM plants to produce more dry matter as compared to ISM (which is devoid of Pup1). Further, it has also been reported that OsPSTOL1 gene acts at least, partially independent of soil P levels, and is responsible for the increase of total root surface, even when the soil has sufficient levels of available P[17]. This may be one of the reasons for increased root volume and dry matter of Pup1 introgressed lines as compared to ISM under normal conditions. The grain weight (i.e. thousand-grain weight) of most introgressed lines was observed to be similar to ISM in normal condition and all the lines possessed medium slender grain type (Supplementary Fig. 6) with grain quality attributes similar to ISM. The grain yield of Pup1 introgressed ISM lines was significantly higher as compared to ISM and other low soil P sensitive checks (MTU 1010 and IR-64) under low soil P condition. This improvement of yield under low P condition was mainly due to the presence of Pup1 in the introgressed lines as reported earlier[14,51]. Under normal conditions, these lines performed equivalent to or better than the recipient parent ISM. This kind of improvement was also observed by Gamuyao et al.[17], in the rice lines which are having OsPSTOL1 as a transgene as compared to the original parent. OsPSTOL1 is a Pup1-specific protein kinase gene, identified in the low soil P tolerant Indian rice variety Kasalath, and is not found in most of the low P sensitive modern varieties released for the irrigated ecosystem and also in Nipponbare, the sequenced reference japonica rice[17]. Under low soil P condition, the Pup1 introgressed line, A-13-144-139 recorded the highest yield, followed by, A-13-144-192, A-13-144-170, A-13-144-53, A-13-144-12, A-13-144-55, and A-13-144-135 and there was no significant difference among these six lines for grain yield. Similarly, under normal P application, the highest grain yield was recorded in the introgression line, A-13-144-139 followed by A-13-144-170, A-13-144-112, A-13-144-53, A-13-144-135, A-13-144-55, and A-13-144-192; however, the yield differences were not significant. The lines which were performing well under both normal and low soil P condition and possessing agro-morphological characters similar to ISM viz., A-13-144-53, A-13-144-139, A-13-144-170, and A-13-144-192 were then advanced further for critical evaluation. All the Pup1 introgressed BC2F3 lines and the recurrent parent, ISM showed resistance reaction (lesion length of < 1 cm with IRRI-SES score of 1) against DX-020 (Supplementary Table 2 and Fig. 3), while Samba Mahsuri (BPT 5204) showed susceptible reaction (lesion length of 18.5 cm with an IRRI-SES score of 9). ISM is an EDV of Samba Mahsuri, bred to achieve resistance against BB in the genetic background of Samba Mahsuri, through pyramiding of three major and effective BB resistance genes viz., Xa21, xa5, xa13 through MABB[19]. In our study, molecular markers specific to these genes were gainfully used to retain the three major BB resistance genes in the Pup1 introgressed lines of ISM. Grain and cooking quality analysis of the introgressed lines of ISM revealed that they are almost similar in quality aspects in comparison to ISM (Table 4, Supplementary Fig. 6). All four selected backcross derived lines of ISM had the highly desirable medium-slender grain type, absence of chalkiness, and gel consistency similar to ISM. From the selected advanced backcross derived lines of ISM possessing Pup1, one superior line, A-13-144-139 (IET 28061) was evaluated in multi-location trials of AICRIP in the year 2018 (in wet season 2018) for its performance over the locations. IET 28061 preformed significantly better under both normal soil P condition as well as under a reduced dose of P application. Based on the excellent performance, it has been promoted to the third year of testing (i.e. final year of testing) in the wet season 2019). After validation under low soil P and normal soil P conditions for another year, the entry, IET 28061 will be recommended and identified for release as a variety for commercial cultivation. The backcross derived lines of ISM, possessing Pup1 developed through this study are also being used as genetic stocks in the improvement of other elite rice lines for low P tolerance and BB resistance, as these lines can be used for simultaneous improvement of both bacterial blight resistance and low soil P tolerance in marker-assisted selection programs. Earlier, through another similar study, we demonstrated that backcross derived lines possessing Pup1 in the genetic background of another Indian mega-variety of rice, MTU1010 show higher and better root-associated traits[51]. Such breeding lines of ISM and MTU1010 possessing Pup1 and performing well in soils with low available P will enhance the yield in the areas where available soil P is low to moderate. Moreover, reduced application of P will help in cutting down the application of P fertilizers significantly, thus helping in a reduction in the cost of production and reduction in the environmental pollution due to P fertilizer run-offs. The two studies also demonstrated that MABB can be effectively utilized in improving elite varieties with greater precision, by introgressing the traits lacking in them to make them better yielding and resistant/tolerant to multiple stresses and ensure that they are more beneficial to the farmers.

Conclusion

As P resources are recognized as one of the limiting resources in the near future, the development and use of low soil P tolerant varieties of crop plants are gaining greater importance. Varietal improvement for tolerance to low soil P in major staple crops like rice helps in cutting down the production costs, import burdens, and environmental contaminations due to fertilizer run-offs. In the present study, MABB approach was successfully utilized in improving low soil P tolerance of an Indian elite rice variety ISM, while retaining its yield, grain, and cooking quality and BB resistance. The low soil P tolerant ISM line performing well in P deficient condition in multi-location trials ensures the possibility of growing rice under reduced application of P fertilizers, P deficient soils, and problematic soils for getting sustainable yields, thus enhancing the income of farmers.

Material and methods

Plant materials

Improved Samba Mahsuri (ISM), a high-yielding, bacterial blight resistant, fine-grain type, low glycemic rice variety, developed and released by ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Hyderabad, India, and CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Hyderabad, India[19] was used as the recurrent parent. ISM, being a near-isogenic line of the very popular, Indian rice mega-variety, Samba Mahsuri is steadily replacing the original rice variety in bacterial blight endemic areas. However, it is highly sensitive to low soil P and hence its adoption is limited in soils prone to low availability of P. Swarna (MTU 7029), a high yielding, mega rice variety of India, which has good tolerance to low soil P and possessing Pup1 (major QTL associated with low soil P tolerance[20], was used as the donor parent in the marker-assisted backcross breeding program.

Development of new co-dominant marker for Pup1, K20-1-1

The PCR products derived from the CAPS marker K20-1[14] from Vandana (low soil P tolerant genotype, possessing Pup1) and ISM (Low soil P sensitive genotype, which is devoid of Pup1) were subjected for Sanger’s sequencing. Initially, the desired fragments of interest were eluted from 1% TAE agarose gel, purified using PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) and cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega) and sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (Perkin Elmer, MA; Bioserve Biotechnologies, India). A multiple sequence alignment, of the sequences from Vandana and ISM with reference genome of Nipponbare and Kasalath corresponding to Pup1 region, retrieved from NCBS database, was carried out using CLUSTALW[21] and physical positions of the amplicons were derived using BioEdit version 7.9[22]. The primer3 version 0.4.0 software[23] was used to design the new primer pairs by targeting an indel region.

Marker-assisted backcross breeding for targeted transfer of Pup1 into Improved Samba Mahsuri

A cross was made between recurrent parent ISM and donor parent Swarna and the true F1s were identified with the help of the co-dominant marker, K20-1-1. The true F1s were backcrossed with the recurrent parent ISM to develop BC1F1s. Foreground selection for Pup1 in BC1F1 was carried out using co-dominant marker K20-1-1 and the positive plants were reconfirmed with the dominant, functional marker K46-1[14]. The positive BC1F1 plants, were then analyzed for bacterial blight resistance using the functional markers specific for bacterial blight resistance genes Xa21 (pTA248[24]), xa13 (xa13prom[25] and xa5 (xa5FM[25]). Such plants were subjected to recombinant selection using the SSR markers RM28011 and RM1261, flanking the Pup1 locus on either side (~ 1.5 Mb) to identify the recombinants with minimum linkage drag. The foreground and recombinant selected plants were then subjected to background selection using parental polymorphic SSR markers (n = 66) which were distributed across the rice genome to identify those positive plants, which have maximum recovery of the recurrent parent genome as described in Sundaram et al.[19]. The process of MABB involving foreground, recombinant, and background selections, was repeated to produce BC2F1s, wherein a single plant possessing Pup1, the bacterial blight resistance genes and recombination event on both sides of Pup1 and also possessing the maximum recovery of ISM genome were identified and selfed to get BC2F2s. They were then analyzed with the co-dominant marker K20-1-1 to identify plants homozygous for Pup1. The plants homozygous for Pup1 were selfed to produce BC2F3s. The BC2F3 plants were then screened for low P tolerance, bacterial blight resistance, key agro-morphological traits, and grain type and the superior lines were advanced through the pedigree method of selection. A set of superior BC2F6 lines were analyzed for grain and cooking quality as explained in Sundaram et al.[19]. The Miniprep protocol recommended by Zheng et al.[26] was followed for DNA isolation from the parents, F1s, and backcross-derived plants. PCR protocol described in Chin et al.[14] was adopted for the marker K46-1, while for the amplification of rice SSR markers, the protocol described in Sundaram et al.[19], was followed. The PCR protocol of initial denaturation 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min was adopted for K20-1-1. The amplified product of K46-1 and SSR markers were resolved in 1.2% and 3.5% Seakem LE agarose gel (Lonza, USA), respectively. The product of K20-1-1 was resolved in native PAGE (8%) for better resolution.

Evaluation of Pup1 introgressed ISM lines for Low P tolerance

The seeds of selected BC2F3 lines were sown in nursery and 30 days old seedlings were transplanted into low soil P plot (Available P < 2 kg ha−1, tested before planting) as well as in normal soil P plot (Available P > 20 kg ha−1) in the experimental research farm at ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR) Hyderabad, India, in an augmented design with four checks, viz., Swarna, ISM, MTU 1010 and IR64. Standard agronomic practices were followed to raise a healthy crop in both normal and low soil P plots, except that no P fertilizer was applied to the low soil P plot. Pre-harvest agro-morphological character like days to 50% flowering (DFF), plant height (PH), number of tillers per plant (NT), flag leaf length (FLL), flag leaf width (FLW), panicle length (PL), shoot length (SL), root length(RL) and root volume (RV), dry shoot weight and dry root weight were recorded during the crop growth. After harvesting the plants, yield per plant, grain type, and 1000-seed weight were recorded. The average root length was measured by carefully uprooting the plants without causing any damage to the root system, washing in running water and measuring the length from the crown of the root to the root tip. The root volume was measured by using the water displacement method, wherein roots were dried in shade and then in a hot air oven and weighed to record the root dry weight. The data were analyzed using SAS 9.2 (SAS version 9.2 software packages, SAS Institute, Inc.; Cary, NC).

Evaluation of Pup1 introgressed ISM lines for bacterial blight resistance

The backcross derived plants grown in normal soil P plot were inoculated with a virulent isolate of the bacterial blight pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) DX-020. The Xoo strain was cultured and stored as described by Laha et al.[27]. The rice plants were clip inoculated with a bacterial suspension of 108–9 cfu/ml at the maximum tillering stage as described in Kauffman et al.[28]. Approximately 5–10 leaves were inoculated per plant, and disease reaction was scored after 14 days from the inoculation. The disease score was also calculated as per the IRRI standard evaluation system (IRRI-SES), based on the percent diseased leaf area[29].

Evaluation of a selected Pup1 containing line of ISM in multi-location trials

A selected NIL of ISM possessing Pup1, namely, A-13-144-139, which had the grain and cooking quality, agro-morphological traits and yield equivalent to ISM, was nominated for AICRIP trials. In this trial, a total of 21 entries derived from different ongoing rice breeding programs all over India were tested for their performance under normal (100% recommended dose of P) and reduced application of P (50% of the recommended dose of P), along with controls[30]. ISM was used as a negative control and Swarna was used as a positive control in the experiments. Supplementary Information.
  14 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Bertrand C Y Collard; David J Mackill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Introduction of bacterial blight resistance into Triguna, a high yielding, mid-early duration rice variety.

Authors:  Raman M Sundaram; M R Vishnupriya; Gouri S Laha; N Shobha Rani; P Srinivasa Rao; Sena M Balachandran; Gajjala Ashok Reddy; Nukala P Sarma; Ramesh V Sonti
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  F Hospital; A Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Developing rice with high yield under phosphorus deficiency: Pup1 sequence to application.

Authors:  Joong Hyoun Chin; Rico Gamuyao; Cheryl Dalid; Masdiar Bustamam; Joko Prasetiyono; Sugiono Moeljopawiro; Matthias Wissuwa; Sigrid Heuer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency.

Authors:  Rico Gamuyao; Joong Hyoun Chin; Juan Pariasca-Tanaka; Paolo Pesaresi; Sheryl Catausan; Cheryl Dalid; Inez Slamet-Loedin; Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza; Matthias Wissuwa; Sigrid Heuer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Delayed reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana improves fitness in soil with suboptimal phosphorus availability.

Authors:  Eric A Nord; Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.228

8.  Development and application of gene-based markers for the major rice QTL Phosphorus uptake 1.

Authors:  Joong Hyoun Chin; Xiaochun Lu; Stephan M Haefele; Rico Gamuyao; Abdelbagi Ismail; Matthias Wissuwa; Sigrid Heuer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  A marker-assisted backcross approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars.

Authors:  C N Neeraja; R Maghirang-Rodriguez; A Pamplona; S Heuer; B C Y Collard; E M Septiningsih; G Vergara; D Sanchez; K Xu; A M Ismail; D J Mackill
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 5.574

10.  A novel allele of the P-starvation tolerance gene OsPSTOL1 from African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud) and its distribution in the genus Oryza.

Authors:  Juan Pariasca-Tanaka; Joong Hyoun Chin; Khady Nani Dramé; Cheryl Dalid; Sigrid Heuer; Matthias Wissuwa
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  2 in total

1.  Marker assisted pedigree breeding based improvement of the Indian mega variety of rice MTU1010 for resistance against bacterial blight and blast and tolerance to low soil phosphorus.

Authors:  Laxmi Prasanna B; Dangi K S; Damodar Raju C H; Jagadeeshwar R; Rekha G; Pragya Sinha; Aleena D; Harika G; Mastanbee S K; Swapnil Ravindra K; Kousik M B V N; Mahadeva Swamy H K; Anila M; Kale R R R R; Dilip Kumar T; Punniakotti E; Hajira S K; Bhadana V P; Sundaram R M
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Multiparent-Derived, Marker-Assisted Introgression Lines of the Elite Indian Rice Cultivar, 'Krishna Hamsa' Show Resistance against Bacterial Blight and Blast and Tolerance to Drought.

Authors:  Jyothi Badri; Gandhudi Lakshmidevi; L R K JaiVidhya; Madamsetty Srinivasa Prasad; Gouri Shankar Laha; Vattikutti Jhansi Lakshmi; Subhakara Rao Isetty; Revadi Padmashree; Divya Balakrishnan; Yasaswini Vishnu Priya Varanasi; Aravind Kumar Jukanti; Uma Maheshwar Singh; Vikas Kumar Singh; Arvind Kumar; T Ram; Lella Venkata Subba Rao; Raman Meenakshi Sundaram
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.