Literature DB >> 33273596

Clinical features and KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer with bone metastasis.

Hyung Soon Park1,2, You Jin Chun3, Han Sang Kim3, Jee Hung Kim4, Choong-Kun Lee3, Seung-Hoon Beom3, Sang Joon Shin3, Joong Bae Ahn5.   

Abstract

Bone metastasis is known as a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clinical manifestations and outcomes are uncertain. CRC with bone metastasis was searched from January 2006 to April 2016. Of 11,551 CRC patients, 321 (2.7%) patients had bone metastasis. Bone-only metastasis was found in only 8.7% of patients. Synchronous bone metastasis was present in 147 (45.8%) patients. In patients with metachronous bone metastasis, the median time from CRC diagnosis to bone metastasis (TTB) was 27.2 months. KRAS mutation status was a marginally significant factor affecting TTB (median TTB, KRAS wild-type or mutation: 29 or 25.8 months, respectively, P = 0.068). Skeletal-related events (SREs) were noted in 200 (62.3%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of bone metastasis was 8.0 months. On multivariate analysis, multi-organ metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 2.7, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 123 were independent factors for OS. Palliative chemotherapy prolonged survival in CRC patients with bone metastasis (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.2-0.33). In conclusion, bone metastasis of CRC is rare, but it is related to SREs. Most patients have other organ metastasis and survival is 8.0 months. Attention should be paid to bone metastasis in CRC patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33273596      PMCID: PMC7713114          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78253-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the fourth most common cancer in the United States, with a total of 101,420 cases of newly diagnosed CRC in 2019[1]. The most common metastatic sites were liver (70%) and lung (37%)[2]. Bone metastasis was observed in 1.2–12% of patients with CRC. The ten-year incidence of bone metastasis from CRC has been reported to be 2.7%[3,4]. Recently, bone metastasis incidence has increased due to improvement of survival of patients with metastatic CRC and diagnostic imaging techniques[5]. Bone metastasis of CRC is related to poor survival outcome. The median survival of patients with bone metastasis of CRC ranges from 7 months to 9.4 months[6-8]. Previous studies have reported that multiple bone metastases, lung metastasis, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are poor prognostic factors in CRC patients. However, these factors have not been universally observed in previous reports. The prognostic factors of patients with bone metastasis are still uncertain. A prognostic model has not been suggested yet. In addition, the role of palliative chemotherapy in CRC patients with bone metastasis has been rarely studied. KRAS mutations have been detected in 40–50% of patients with CRC[9,10]. KRAS mutations at codon 12 or 13 account for approximately 90% of all mutation types. In general, clinical behaviors are more aggressively presented in patients with KRAS mutations. Recurrence-free survival is significantly worse and lung metastasis is significantly higher in CRC patients with KRAS mutations[11-13]. Although the prognostic value of KRAS mutations is still controversial, some studies have revealed that KRAS mutations are associated with poorer survival[12,14-16]. However, associations between KRAS mutations and bone metastases have not been reported yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the clinical features of CRC patients with bone metastasis, including time to bone metastasis (TTB), metastatic sites of bone, and skeletal-related events (SREs) by KRAS mutation status. In addition, prognostic factors for CRC with bone metastasis were evaluated, and a prognostic model for survival was also suggested.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of 11,551 CRC patients, colon cancer (7242, 62.7%) and rectal cancer (4309, 37.3%) with bone metastasis were diagnosed in 192 (2.7%) patients and 129 (3.0%) patients, respectively. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Their median age was 61 years old. There were 188 (58.6%) male patients. Colon cancer was slightly predominant (59.8%). Similar metastatic pattern were observed in both the synchronous and metachronous groups. There were 292 (91%) cases of adenocarcinoma. A total of 229 (71.3%) patients were classified as stage 4 at the initial time of CRC diagnosis. Bone-only metastasis occurred in 28 (8.7%) patients. Frequently observed metastatic sites of bone included the spine (68.8%) and pelvis (51.7%). Median laboratory values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and CEA at the time of bone metastasis were 3.5, 247 × 103/μL, 114 IU/L, and 75.4 ng/mL, respectively. Of patients whose KRAS mutation status was revealed, 126 (61.8%) patients had wild-type KRAS, while 78 (38.2%) patients had KRAS mutations. According to the presence of KRAS mutation, old age, females, and right-sided colon cancer patients were statistically predominant in the group with KRAS mutation. In addition, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, high ALP level and high CEA level were frequently observed at the time of bone metastasis in the group with KRAS mutation. Codon 12 mutation, codon 13 mutation, and mutation site unknown accounted for 58, 16, and 4 cases, respectively. Clinical differences by KRAS mutation type and tumor sidedness were also analyzed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2. A total of 212 (66%) patients received palliative chemotherapy.
Table 1

Characteristics of CRC with bone metastasis according to KRAS mutation status.

All patientsKRAS
Wild typeMutant typeP-value
No. (321)%No. (126)%No. (78)%
Age(Median, range)6128–875829–836228–790.007
SexMale18858.68164.33848.70.028
Female13341.44535.74051.3
Primary siteColon19259.87962.74861.50.868
Rectum12940.24737.33038.5
Tumor sidenessLeft side25077.910584.75571.40.023
Right side6319.61915.32228.6
Metastasis patternSynchronous14745.85543.73139.70.583
Metachronous17454.27156.34760.3
Histologic typeAdenocarcinoma2929111490.57393.60.325
SRC144.475.611.3
Mucinous carcinoma154.75445.1
Clinical stage at CRC diagnosis1 or 2195.975.767.70.283
36821.232261316.7
422971.38468.35975.6
Bone only metastasisYes288.797.122.60.211
No29391.311792.97697.4
Other organ metastasis
Liver metastasisNo13742.75946.82228.20.008
Yes18457.36753.25671.8
Lung metastasisNo15347.763502835.90.049
Yes16852.363505064.1
Peritoneal metastasisNo24375.79071.46076.90.387
Yes7824.33628.61823.1
Brain metastasisNo30695.312296.87089.70.062
Yes154.743.2810.3
Site of bone metastasis
SpineNo10031.23729.42937.20.246
Yes22168.88970.64962.8
PelvisNo15548.36047.63950
Yes16651.76652.43950
Long boneNo25278.510079.46279.50.983
Yes6921.52620.61620.5
Other boneaNo19761.47962.75064.10.84
Yes12438.64737.32835.9
Laboratory values at diagnosis of bone metastasis (median, range)NLR3.50.4–31.83.50.6–19.73.60.8–31.80.937
Platelet (× 1000/uL)24725–65424326–63724525–6540.903
ALP (IU/L)11417–15099817–89713632–15090.025
CEA (ng/mL)75.40.4–20,00077.70.4–20,000159.32.3–20,0000.041
Palliative CTxIrinotecan based9629.94737.332410.136
Oxaliplatin based7322.73326.21012.8
Othersb4313.41612.71114.1
No109343023.82532.1

CRC colorectal cancer, CTx chemotherapy, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, ALP alkaline phosphatase, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, No number.

aOther bone include skull, rib, scapula, knee, clavicle, sternum.

bOthers include fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy, target monotherapy (cetuximab, bevacizumab, regorafenib).

Characteristics of CRC with bone metastasis according to KRAS mutation status. CRC colorectal cancer, CTx chemotherapy, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, ALP alkaline phosphatase, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, No number. aOther bone include skull, rib, scapula, knee, clavicle, sternum. bOthers include fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy, target monotherapy (cetuximab, bevacizumab, regorafenib).

Natural course of bone metastasis

Metachronous bone metastasis occurred in 174 (54.2%) patients (Fig. 1). In metachronous bone metastasis patients, the median TTB was 27.2 months. TTB was analyzed by clinical factors (Table 2). The median TTB in patients with initial clinical stages 1/2, 3, and 4 were 35.9, 28.8, and 20.9 months, respectively (P < 0.001). KRAS mutation status was a marginally significant factor affecting time to bone metastasis. Patients with KRAS wild-type or mutation had a median TTB of 29 months or 25.8 months, respectively (P = 0.068). In addition, mucinous carcinoma had a shorter tendency of time to bone metastasis compared with that of non-mucinous carcinoma (median TTB, 16.2 months vs. 27.4 months, P = 0.269). SREs, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone, radiotherapy to bone, and hypercalcemia were observed in 26 (8.1%), 28 (87%), 43 (13.4%), 183 (57%), and 12 (3.7%) patients, respectively (Table 3). There was no significant difference in the SRE pattern between patients with KRAS wild-type and patients with KRAS mutation.
Figure 1

Time to bone metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis according to KRAS mutation status.

Table 2

Median time from primary cancer diagnosis to bone metastasis in metachronous patients.

CategoricalNo. of patientsMedian time (months)95% CIP-value
Age
 < 619227.424.530.30.171
 ≥ 618225.720.730.7
Sex
Male10627.323.930.70.831
Female6825.820.231.4
Primary site
Colon9125.921.929.90.498
Rectum8328.32531.6
KRAS mutation
Wild type712923.534.50.068
Mutant type4725.815.935.7
Tumor sideness
Left side14328.325.531.10.457
Right side2922.614.031.2
Histologic type
Adenocarcinoma or SRC16427.424.830.00.269
Mucinous carcinoma1016.211.121.3
Initial clinical stage
1 or 21935.923.248.6 < 0.001
36828.824.133.5
48220.916.325.5
Overall17427.224.230.2

SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, No number, CI confidence interval.

Table 3

Skeletal related events.

VariableAll, No. (321)KRAS wild type, No. (126)KRAS mutant type, No. (78)P-value
No%No%No%
SRE, total20062.38164.35570.50.359
Pathologic fracture268.1129.567.70.654
Spinal cord compression288.71310.3810.30.989
Surgery to bone4313.41915.11215.40.953
Radiotherapy to bone183577559.55165.40.403
Hypercalcemia123.75467.70.34

SRE skeletal related event, No number.

Time to bone metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis according to KRAS mutation status. Median time from primary cancer diagnosis to bone metastasis in metachronous patients. SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, No number, CI confidence interval. Skeletal related events. SRE skeletal related event, No number.

Survival analysis

The median follow-up time was 7.4 months. The median OS from diagnosis of bone metastasis was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.8–9.2 months). The statistically determined best cut-off point of NLR was 2.7. Survival was significantly extended in patients with low levels of NLR or ALP compared to patients with high levels of NLR or ALP (median OS, NLR: 12.2 months vs. 5.6 months, P < 0.001; ALP: 11.2 months vs. 5.2 months, P < 0.001; Fig. 2A,B). Patients with bone-only metastasis had the longest median OS of 20.4 months (Fig. 2C). Peritoneal carcinomatosis showed poor survival outcome (median OS: 9.2 months vs. 4.3 months, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2D). However, KRAS mutation status did not significantly affect survival outcome (median OS: wild-type vs. mutant type, 9.2 months vs. 8.4 months, P = 0.083).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) for all patients (n = 321) according to prognostic factors: (A) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), (B) alkaline phosphatase (ALP), (C) bone-only metastasis, and (D) peritoneal metastasis.

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) for all patients (n = 321) according to prognostic factors: (A) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), (B) alkaline phosphatase (ALP), (C) bone-only metastasis, and (D) peritoneal metastasis. According to univariate analysis, primary site; tumor sidedness; bone metastasis pattern (bone-only or multi-organ metastasis); presence of liver, lung or peritoneal metastasis; NLR; ALP level; and CEA level were all associated with OS at p-value < 0.05 (Table 4). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that multi-organ metastasis (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.43; 95% CI 1.39–4.25), peritoneal metastasis (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08–2.02), NLR ≥ 2.7 (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.17–2.04), and ALP ≥ 123 (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.32–2.34) were independent factors for OS. Bone-only metastasis was a prognostic factor with the highest hazard ratio for OS.
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis using cox regression for OS.

CategoricalUnivariateMultivariate
No. of patientsHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age
 < 6115410.057
 ≥ 611671.260.991.59
Sex
Male18810.876
Female1330.980.771.25
Primary site
Colon19210.041
Rectum1290.780.610.99
KRAS mutation
Wild type12610.085
Mutant type781.310.961.79
Tumor sideness
Left side25010.018
Right side631.441.061.94
Metastasis pattern
Synchronous14710.815
Metachronous1740.970.771.23
Histologic type
Adenocarcinoma29210.727
SRC141.150.662.00
Mucinous carcinoma150.840.481.47
Bone-only metastasis
Yes281 < 0.00110.002
No2933.021.884.872.431.394.25
Liver metastasis
No1371 < 0.001
Yes1841.871.452.40
Lung metastasis
No15310.022
Yes1681.321.041.67
Peritoneal metastasis
No2431 < 0.00110.016
Yes782.051.562.711.471.082.02
Brain metastasis
No30610.172
Yes151.460.852.50
NLR
 < 2.71101 < 0.00110.002
 ≥ 2.71951.721.332.211.541.172.04
ALP (IU/L)
 < 1231591 < 0.0011 < 0.001
 ≥ 1231352.171.672.811.761.322.34
CEA (ng/mL)
 < 5371 < 0.001
 ≥ 52532.291.523.45
Palliative CTx
No1091 < 0.001
Yes2120.250.200.33

NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, ALP alkaline phosphatase, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CTx chemotherapy, SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, OS overall survival, No number, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.

Univariate and multivariate analysis using cox regression for OS. NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, ALP alkaline phosphatase, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CTx chemotherapy, SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, OS overall survival, No number, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.

Prognostic model analysis

We divided patients into two subgroups based on four independent prognostic factors for OS: 171 patients with 0 to 2 adverse prognostic factors (low-risk group) and 122 patients with three to four adverse prognostic factors (high-risk group). These risk groups were significantly associated with OS (median OS for low- and high-risk groups: 11.9 months and 4.1 months, respectively, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A). Regardless of the risk group, palliative chemotherapy had a benefit for OS in patients with bone metastasis. Among 171 low-risk patients, 123 (71.9%) patients received palliative chemotherapy. As shown in Fig. 3B, patients treated with palliative chemotherapy had longer OS than patients who received the best supportive care, including radiotherapy (median OS: 16.7 months vs. 4.3 months respectively, P < 0.001). Among 122 high-risk patients, OS was also longer in the palliative chemotherapy group (median OS: 6.8 months vs. 2.3 months, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) curves according to risk group defined by number of adverse prognostic factors: (A) low-risk (0 to 2 adverse factors) and high-risk (3 to 4 adverse factors) groups, (B) palliative chemotherapy in the low-risk patients, and (C) palliative chemotherapy in the high-risk patients.

Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) curves according to risk group defined by number of adverse prognostic factors: (A) low-risk (0 to 2 adverse factors) and high-risk (3 to 4 adverse factors) groups, (B) palliative chemotherapy in the low-risk patients, and (C) palliative chemotherapy in the high-risk patients.

Discussion

Bone metastasis of CRC is rare, but it is related to SREs. Most patients have other organ metastasis and survival is 8.0 months in unselected patients. KRAS mutation affected different clinical manifestations in these patients. We showed that patients with KRAS mutation had a tendency to have shorter time to bone metastasis than patients with wild-type KRAS, but there were no significant survival differences between patients with KRAS wild-type and those with KRAS mutation. Several prognostic factors were noted in this study. Patients who received palliative chemotherapy showed prolonged survival compared to patients with supportive care, especially in patients with less adverse factors. The observed frequency of bone metastasis in CRC was 1.2–12%, with a wide range[3,4]. Each study included CRC with bone metastasis in various clinical settings dealing with resected patients or metastatic patients. It might be related to the wide range of bone metastasis incidence in CRC patients. Recently, systemic chemotherapy was more effective and survival was prolonged. In addition, diagnostic modality such as positron emission tomography (PET) coupled with computed tomography (CT) scan (PET-CT) was developed and possibility of bone metastasis detection would be increased. Asymptomatic bone metastasis could be detected on routine follow-up. It might help prevent SREs, but it has a possibility of overtreatment, such as chemotherapy regimen change or radiotherapy. Therefore, the role of asymptomatic bone metastasis detection should be investigated in further studies. In contrast, surveillance cannot be performed until death in various circumstances, and routine follow-up schemes without bone scintigraphy or PET-CT may not detect bone metastasis. These factors are related to the underdiagnosis of bone metastasis. In clinical practice, at the time of bone metastasis, multi-organ metastases were frequently observed. Bone-only metastasis was found in only 8.7% of subjects, and 91.3% of patients had other organ metastasis in this study. Commonly observed multi-organ metastases might be related to the poor prognosis in bone metastasis[5]. KRAS mutation has been studied as a metastasis promoting factor in CRC. The results of our study also showed that patients with KRAS mutation had a higher frequency of both lung and liver metastases at the time of bone metastasis. In addition, patients with KRAS mutation more frequently had high ALP and high CEA levels. Regarding KRAS mutation type (codon 12 vs. codon 13), there were no significant clinical differences between these two groups, except the NLR level. The median time to bone metastasis was 27.2 months in metachronous patients. Time to bone metastasis was shorter in patients with KRAS mutation compared to patients with wild type KRAS, although it was not statistically significant. It has been reported that KRAS mutation can lead to shorter time to metastasis in liver, lung, and bone[17]. Initial CRC stage was also a significant factor for time to bone metastasis. Based on our data, first surveillance for identification of bone metastasis might be considered within 2 years after primary CRC diagnosis and attention is needed, especially in patients with initial stage 4. Additional evaluation and close monitoring 2 years after CRC diagnosis should also be performed. Risk factors for bone metastasis in CRC have been reported in many studies[8]. Primary tumor location, tumor stage and histologic type were revealed as significant risk factors for bone metastasis. Regarding tumor location, other studies have shown that rectal cancer had a greater chance of bone metastasis than colon cancer. Although our studies showed more of a tendency for bone metastasis in rectal cancer compared to that in colon cancer, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.28). This study included all CRC patients treated in our institution, and the distribution of clinical factors, such as stage and histology, may have affected the results in the two groups. The prognosis of bone metastasis in CRC patients was poor. The median survival of these patients was approximately 8 months[7,18]. Prognostic factors for bone metastasis in CRC have been evaluated in several studies. Multiple bone metastases, primary site of colon/lung metastasis, and elevated CEA level have been identified as poor prognostic factors. In our study, four prognostic factors were revealed: multi-organ metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, high NLR (≥ 2.7), and high ALP (≥ 123 IU/L). Of these factors, whether a patient had bone-only metastasis was a prognostic factor with the highest hazard ratio for OS (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.39–4.25). The median survival was 7.8 months for patients with other organ metastasis and 20.4 months for those with bone-only metastasis. We also made a prognosis scoring model using the four independent factors. Risk group was categorized as low-risk (score 0–2) and high-risk (score 3–4) groups. The median survival of the low-risk group was 11.9 months. It was almost 1.5-fold (4 months longer) than that of unselected CRC patients with bone metastasis. Bone metastasis is an important factor for quality of life and survival. Proper treatment, including radiotherapy, surgery and medical therapy, improves bone metastasis symptoms, such as pain, and bisphosphonates could delay the development of SREs[8]. In addition, bone metastasis has been known to be a poor prognostic factor in metastatic CRC. In our study, palliative chemotherapy provided patients a chance to increase survival up to 16.7 months in the low-risk group. The high-risk group also had a survival gain from palliative chemotherapy, although the survival benefit was less than the low-risk group. We had to pay attention to the interpretation of this survival data analyzed by the presence of chemotherapy, because patients who did not receive chemotherapy might have poor performance status or comorbidities, which might be related to poor prognosis. Our results suggest the possibility of chemotherapy benefit in bone metastasis patients, and predictive markers for chemotherapy should be further studied. A prognosis scoring model might help predict the survival for CRC patients with bone metastasis and guide treatment decisions, including palliative chemotherapy, or the best supportive care according to their benefits. This study had several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study. Thus, the performance status could not be identified. Second, this study did not evaluate the impact of bisphosphonates on SREs. Bisphosphonates are not reimbursed in Korea. They are only permitted in hypercalcemia secondary to CRC. However, this study also has its strengths. Large numbers of patients were enrolled, and KRAS mutation status and tumor sidedness were analyzed to identify their roles in bone metastasis of CRC. In conclusion, bone metastasis of CRC is rare, but it is related to SREs. Most patients have other organ metastasis and survival is 8.0 months in unselected patients. It should receive more attention from clinicians. Time to bone metastasis and prognosis were not different according to KRAS mutation status in our study. Surveillance for bone metastasis might be considered in the first 2 years after CRC diagnosis, and additional evaluation and close monitoring 2 years after the CRC diagnosis should be performed. According to our prognosis scoring model, a patient’s prognosis could be predicted, and it may help to guide palliative chemotherapy in CRC with bone metastasis.

Methods

Patient selection

From January 2006 to April 2016, a total of 11,551 patients were diagnosed with CRC at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Diagnosis was made from surgical excision or tissue biopsy. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age > 18 years, (2) histologically confirmed diagnosis of CRC, (3) radiologically or pathologically confirmed bone metastasis, and (4) available electronic medical records (including treatment information). Patients with other histology types, such as neuroendocrine tumors, small cell carcinoma, melanoma, or lymphoma, were excluded. A total of 321 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Severance Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this retrospective study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was consistent with Good Clinical Practice.

Data collection

To diagnose bone metastasis, plain radiography, technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m MDP) whole body bone scintigraphy, CT scan, PET-CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. All available correlative radiographic studies were reviewed. The following baseline data were recorded at the time of bone metastasis: age, sex, tumor location, histologic type, initial stage, metastatic organ, and KRAS mutation status. For tumor sidedness determination, the splenic flexure was used for differentiation of the left side of the colon and right side of the colon. KRAS mutation status was identified by Sanger sequencing, the peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method[19], or pyrosequencing. Sanger sequencing and the PNA-mediated PCR clamping method were used to detect mutations in codons 12 and 13. Pyrosequencing was performed to detect mutations at codons 12, 13, and 61. Metachronous bone metastasis was defined as the time to bone metastasis being greater than 3 months from initial CRC diagnosis. Hematological and blood chemistry values included NLR, platelet count, ALP, and CEA. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. Parameters related to bone metastasis included time to bone metastasis, site of bone metastasis, and SREs defined by pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone, radiotherapy to bone, and hypercalcemia. After the diagnosis of bone metastasis, whether patients received palliative chemotherapy was also reviewed.

Statistical analysis

The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using the Chi square or Fisher exact test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons of continuous variables. In patients with metachronous bone metastasis, freedom from bone metastasis since CRC diagnosis was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of bone metastasis diagnosis to death from any cause. Hematological and blood chemistry values were initially recorded as continuous variables and later transformed into categorical variables according to lower or upper normal values (platelet count, ALP level, and CEA level) or the best cut-off point (NLR) determined by the Contal and O’Quigley method, which calculates the maximization of the hazard ratio based on log rank statistics and estimates the best cut-off value[20]. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate analysis was performed to determine associations of OS with the following prognostic factors: age; sex; tumor location and sidedness; timing of bone metastasis (synchronous or metachronous); histologic type; bone metastasis pattern (bone-only or not); liver, lung, peritoneal, and/or brain metastasis; NLR; ALP level; CEA level; KRAS mutation status; and palliative chemotherapy treatment. A stepwise multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model was performed using significant factors from the univariate analysis. Hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI, and χ2 scores were obtained for all regressions. Statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), SAS version 9.2 (SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA), and R version 3.1.3 (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria www.R-project.org). Supplementary Information.
  19 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Prognostic risk factors in patients with bone metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fangqi Liu; Jiang Zhao; Jie Xie; Li Xie; Ji Zhu; Sanjun Cai; Hongtu Zheng; Ye Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-12

3.  Natural history of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer: final results of a large Italian bone metastases study.

Authors:  D Santini; M Tampellini; B Vincenzi; T Ibrahim; C Ortega; V Virzi; N Silvestris; R Berardi; C Masini; N Calipari; D Ottaviani; V Catalano; G Badalamenti; R Giannicola; F Fabbri; O Venditti; M E Fratto; C Mazzara; T P Latiano; F Bertolini; F Petrelli; A Ottone; C Caroti; L Salvatore; A Falcone; P Giordani; R Addeo; M Aglietta; S Cascinu; S Barni; E Maiello; G Tonini
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Treatment and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Mutsumi Nozue; Yukio Oshiro; Masanao Kurata; Ken-Ichiro Seino; Naoto Koike; Toru Kawamoto; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Todoroki; Katashi Fukao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Bone metastases in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Fabienne Portales; Simon Thézenas; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat; Thibault Mazard; Marc Ychou
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial.

Authors:  Arnaud D Roth; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Pu Yan; Roberto Fiocca; Dirk Klingbiel; Daniel Dietrich; Bart Biesmans; György Bodoky; Carlo Barone; Enrique Aranda; Bernard Nordlinger; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Fred Bosman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cong Tan; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Association between KRAS mutation and lung metastasis in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A A L Pereira; J F M Rego; V Morris; M J Overman; C Eng; C R Garrett; A T Boutin; R Ferrarotto; M Lee; Z-Q Jiang; P M Hoff; J-N Vauthey; E Vilar; D Maru; S Kopetz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Matias Riihimäki; Akseli Hemminki; Jan Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Incidence of bone metastases in patients with solid tumors: analysis of oncology electronic medical records in the United States.

Authors:  Rohini K Hernandez; Sally W Wade; Adam Reich; Melissa Pirolli; Alexander Liede; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advancing Treatment of Bone Metastases through Novel Translational Approaches Targeting the Bone Microenvironment.

Authors:  Nan Sethakorn; Erika Heninger; Cristina Sánchez-de-Diego; Adeline B Ding; Ravi Chandra Yada; Sheena C Kerr; David Kosoff; David J Beebe; Joshua M Lang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Predictive models based on machine learning for bone metastasis in patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Honghong Huang; Shuocun Zhang; Yongdan Zhang; Haoren Jing; Tianwei Sun; Xipeng Zhang; Liangfu Lu; Mingqing Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20

Review 3.  Recent Updates on the Significance of KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Biology.

Authors:  Loretta László; Anita Kurilla; Tamás Takács; Gyöngyi Kudlik; Kitti Koprivanacz; László Buday; Virag Vas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.