| Literature DB >> 33273554 |
Wiwittawin Sukmas1,2, Vichawan Sakulsupich1,2, Prutthipong Tsuppayakorn-Aek1,2, Udomsilp Pinsook1,2, Teerachote Pakornchote1,2, Rakchat Klinkla1,2, Thiti Bovornratanaraks3,4.
Abstract
A microscopic viewpoint of structure and dipolar configurations in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites is crucial to understanding their stability and phase transitions. The necessity of incorporating dispersion interactions in the state-of-the-art density functional theory for the [Formula: see text] perovskite (MAPI) is demonstrated in this work. Some of the vdW methods were selected to evaluate the corresponding energetics properties of the cubic MAPI with various azimuthally rotated MA organic cation orientations. The highest energy barrier obtained from PBEsol reaches 18.6 meV/MA-ion, which is equivalent to 216 K, the temperature above which the MA cations randomly reorient. Energy profiles calculated by vdW incorporated functionals, on the other hand, exhibit various distinct patterns. The well-developed vdW-DF-cx functional was selected, thanks to its competence, to evaluate the total energies of different MA dipolar configurations in [Formula: see text] cubic supercell of MAPI under pressures. The centrosymmetric arrangement of the MA cations that provide zero total dipole moment configuration results in the lowest energy state profiles under pressure, while the non-centrosymmetric scheme displays a unique behaviour. Despite being overall unpolarised, the latter calculated with PBEsol leads to a rigid shift of energy from the profile obtained from the dispersive vdW-DF-cx functional. It is noteworthy that the energy profile responsible for the maximum polarised configuration nevertheless takes the second place in total energy under pressure.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273554 PMCID: PMC7713306 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77852-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Details of energy barrier evaluation: (a) The cubic structure of MAPI with a lattice parameter of 6.317 Å as input structure embedding an organic MA cation, with labelled atoms; (b) Total energy per cation profiles calculated by different functionals, taking the lowest total energy as a reference[28]; Inset depicts an applied anticlockwise rotation about the a-axis for the MA cation.
Figure 2Two types of voids in space group. We introduce simplified notations of the structure and the voids. denotes a spherical void; x-D, y-D, and z-D denote dumbbell voids in their respective orientation. The MA cation in (a) and x-D void (b).
Figure 3Schematic orientation of the (MA) molecules. The diagram plane is in xy-plane and the lower diagrams show the bottom layer of the cell. Light red squares are the sphere voids (denoted by ), and cyan squares denote the dumbbell-like voids (denoted by , where denotes voids in lower layer and is for upper layer of the simulation cell. Arrows (and symbols) in the diagrams show the orientation of the molecule inside each void. The arrow head is N and the tail is C. Circle means that the arrow is pointing outward from the paper and the cross means that the arrow pointing into the paper.
Figure 5Energy of all schemes as a function of pressure. Energy of SCHEME A is selected as a reference.
Figure 4Schematic orientation of MA molecules. By structural optimisation starting from Scheme C in (a), the MA evolved into (b) and (c) at low pressure (0.55–2.5 GPa), and (d) at higher pressure (2.7–3.83 GPa).