Joseph P Grande1, Erika S Helgeson2, Arthur J Matas3. 1. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Department of Surgery, Transplantation Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glomerular size in renal allografts is impacted by donor-recipient factors and response to injury. In serial biopsies of patients with well-functioning grafts, increased glomerular size correlates with better survival. However, no previous study has addressed the association of glomerular size at the time of a for-cause biopsy and clinical/histopathologic markers of injury, or effect on long-term graft outcome. METHODS: Two cohorts of kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function study were evaluated. The prospective cohort (PC, n = 581): patients undergoing first for-cause kidney biopsy 1.7 ± 1.4 (mean ± SD) y posttransplant; and the cross-sectional cohort (CSC, n = 446): patients developing new-onset renal function deterioration 7.7 ± 5.6 y posttransplant. Glomerular planar surface area and diameter were measured on all glomeruli containing a vascular pole. Kidney biopsy was read centrally in a blinded fashion according to the Banff criteria. RESULTS: Glomerular area was significantly higher in the CSC than the PC; time from transplant to indication biopsy was associated with glomerular area in both cohorts (P values ≤ 0.001). Glomerular area was associated with indices of microvascular inflammation (glomerulitis, peritubular capillary infiltrates; P values ≤ 0.001) and segmental glomerulosclerosis (P value < 0.0001). In the CSC, higher glomerular area was associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (P value ≤ 0.001) and increased graft survival after accounting for microvascular inflammation (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.967; 95% confidence interval: 0.948-0.986; hazard ratio in biopsies without evidence of diabetes or antibody mediated rejection = 0.919, 95% confidence interval: 0.856-0.987). CONCLUSIONS: Glomerular size is associated with histopathologic features present at the time of indication biopsy and with increased graft survival in the CSC.
BACKGROUND: Glomerular size in renal allografts is impacted by donor-recipient factors and response to injury. In serial biopsies of patients with well-functioning grafts, increased glomerular size correlates with better survival. However, no previous study has addressed the association of glomerular size at the time of a for-cause biopsy and clinical/histopathologic markers of injury, or effect on long-term graft outcome. METHODS: Two cohorts of kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function study were evaluated. The prospective cohort (PC, n = 581): patients undergoing first for-cause kidney biopsy 1.7 ± 1.4 (mean ± SD) y posttransplant; and the cross-sectional cohort (CSC, n = 446): patients developing new-onset renal function deterioration 7.7 ± 5.6 y posttransplant. Glomerular planar surface area and diameter were measured on all glomeruli containing a vascular pole. Kidney biopsy was read centrally in a blinded fashion according to the Banff criteria. RESULTS: Glomerular area was significantly higher in the CSC than the PC; time from transplant to indication biopsy was associated with glomerular area in both cohorts (P values ≤ 0.001). Glomerular area was associated with indices of microvascular inflammation (glomerulitis, peritubular capillary infiltrates; P values ≤ 0.001) and segmental glomerulosclerosis (P value < 0.0001). In the CSC, higher glomerular area was associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (P value ≤ 0.001) and increased graft survival after accounting for microvascular inflammation (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.967; 95% confidence interval: 0.948-0.986; hazard ratio in biopsies without evidence of diabetes or antibody mediated rejection = 0.919, 95% confidence interval: 0.856-0.987). CONCLUSIONS: Glomerular size is associated with histopathologic features present at the time of indication biopsy and with increased graft survival in the CSC.
Authors: K Solez; R B Colvin; L C Racusen; M Haas; B Sis; M Mengel; P F Halloran; W Baldwin; G Banfi; A B Collins; F Cosio; D S R David; C Drachenberg; G Einecke; A B Fogo; I W Gibson; D Glotz; S S Iskandar; E Kraus; E Lerut; R B Mannon; M Mihatsch; B J Nankivell; V Nickeleit; J C Papadimitriou; P Randhawa; H Regele; K Renaudin; I Roberts; D Seron; R N Smith; M Valente Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Arthur J Matas; Erika S Helgeson; Robert Gaston; Fernando Cosio; Roslyn Mannon; Bertram L Kasiske; Lawrence Hunsicker; Sita Gourishankar; David Rush; J Michael Cecka; John Connett; Joseph P Grande Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Amgad E el-Agroudy; Nabil A Hassan; Mohamed A Bakr; Mohamed A Foda; Ahmed A Shokeir; Ahmed B Shehab el-Dein Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2003-08-06 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: A Loupy; M Haas; K Solez; L Racusen; D Glotz; D Seron; B J Nankivell; R B Colvin; M Afrouzian; E Akalin; N Alachkar; S Bagnasco; J U Becker; L Cornell; C Drachenberg; D Dragun; H de Kort; I W Gibson; E S Kraus; C Lefaucheur; C Legendre; H Liapis; T Muthukumar; V Nickeleit; B Orandi; W Park; M Rabant; P Randhawa; E F Reed; C Roufosse; S V Seshan; B Sis; H K Singh; C Schinstock; A Tambur; A Zeevi; M Mengel Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Flávio Vasconcelos Ordones; Pedro Ivo Rocchetti Pajolli; Rodrigo Guerra da Silva; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Fernando Fereira Gomes Filho; Paulo Roberto Kawano; João Luiz Amaro; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Haas; A Loupy; C Lefaucheur; C Roufosse; D Glotz; D Seron; B J Nankivell; P F Halloran; R B Colvin; Enver Akalin; N Alachkar; S Bagnasco; Y Bouatou; J U Becker; L D Cornell; J P Duong van Huyen; I W Gibson; Edward S Kraus; R B Mannon; M Naesens; V Nickeleit; P Nickerson; D L Segev; H K Singh; M Stegall; P Randhawa; L Racusen; K Solez; M Mengel Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-01-21 Impact factor: 8.086