Literature DB >> 33273294

Ambulatory Care Fragmentation and Subsequent Hospitalization: Evidence From the REGARDS Study.

Lisa M Kern1, Joanna B Ringel1, Mangala Rajan1, Lisandro D Colantonio2, Lawrence P Casalino1, Laura C Pinheiro1, Evgeniya Reshetnyak1, Monika M Safford1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that highly fragmented ambulatory care increases the risk of subsequent hospitalization, but those studies used claims only and were not able to adjust for many clinical potential confounders.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the association between fragmented ambulatory care and subsequent hospitalization, adjusting for demographics, medical conditions, medications, health behaviors, psychosocial variables, and physiological variables.
DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of data (2003-2016) from the nationwide REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, linked to Medicare fee-for-service claims.
SUBJECTS: A total of 12,693 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older from the REGARDS study who had at least 4 ambulatory visits in the first year of observation and did not have a hospitalization in the prior year. MEASURES: We defined high fragmentation as a reversed Bice-Boxerman score above the 75th percentile. We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine the association between fragmentation as a time-varying exposure and incident hospitalization in the 3 months following each exposure period.
RESULTS: The mean age was 70.4 years; 54% were women, and 33% were African American. During the first year of observation, participants with high fragmentation had a median of 8 ambulatory visits with 6 providers, whereas participants with low fragmentation had a median of 7 visits with 3 providers. Over 11.8 years of follow-up, 6947 participants (55%) had a hospitalization. High fragmentation was associated with an increased hazard of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio=1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.24).
CONCLUSION: Highly fragmented ambulatory care is an independent risk factor for hospitalization.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33273294      PMCID: PMC7954814          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   3.178


  27 in total

Review 1.  Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Authors:  L D Fisher; D Y Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Fragmented ambulatory care and subsequent emergency department visits and hospital admissions among Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Joanna K Seirup; Mangala Rajan; Rachel Jawahar; Susan S Stuard
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Fragmented ambulatory care and subsequent healthcare utilization among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Joanna K Seirup; Mangala Rajan; Rachel Jawahar; Susan S Stuard
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  A quantitative measure of continuity of care.

Authors:  T W Bice; S B Boxerman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Disparities in stroke incidence contributing to disparities in stroke mortality.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Elsayed Z Soliman; Brett M Kissela; George Howard
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; James D Reschovsky
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-10

8.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits.

Authors:  Peter C Smith; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Caroline Bublitz; Bennett Parnes; L Miriam Dickinson; Rebecca Van Vorst; John M Westfall; Wilson D Pace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism report on moderate drinking.

Authors:  Lorraine Gunzerath; Vivian Faden; Samir Zakhari; Kenneth Warren
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Claire Lupo; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Health care fragmentation and blood pressure control among adults taking antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  Calvin L Colvin; Monika M Safford; Paul Muntner; Lisandro D Colantonio; Lisa M Kern
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.247

2.  Empirically identified networks of healthcare providers for adults with mental illness.

Authors:  Joshua Breslau; Beth Dana; Harold Pincus; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Luke Matthews
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.