Literature DB >> 33272879

Cardiac involvement in COVID-19: does echocardiography matter?

Pablo Jorge-Pérez1, Albert Durán-Cambra2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33272879      PMCID: PMC7674006          DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 1885-5857


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, After attentively reading the article by Rodríguez-Santamarta et al., we would like to provide some considerations regarding echocardiography for critically ill patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In the analysis of their patient series, the authors found no association between systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%) and a poor prognosis. These results led them to propose limiting echocardiography studies to patients with congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, electrocardiographic changes, or cardiomegaly. First, we wish to congratulate the group for an interesting and important study carried out in these difficult times of the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation has created a new scenario requiring constant efforts of adaptation, and studies such as this enable advances in the knowledge and treatment of this disease. In our opinion, the results provided should be analyzed with caution, as the study contains a small, single-center sample and the results contrast with those reported in previous articles on COVID-19 patients in intensive care units. In these studies, elevated biomarkers of myocardial injury and stress, such as cardiac troponin and the amino-terminal fraction of pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with a worse prognosis.2, 3 Of note, cardiac involvement in these patients is not limited to changes in left ventricular systolic function, the variable analyzed in association with the prognosis in the study. It seems that right ventricular dilation and dysfunction are even more common, likely resulting from increased pulmonary vascular resistance due to alveolar hypoxia and possible thromboembolic phenomena. Echocardiography, and more recently lung ultrasound, are first-line tests in the assessment of critically ill patients because of their wide availability and high diagnostic yield. We agree that it is important to balance the indication and benefits of conducting these studies when there is a potential risk of disease transmission, and in this regard, critically ill patient deserves special consideration. There is a non-negligible prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and myocardial injury in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19, as many have various underlying heart conditions (right ventricular systolic dysfunction and dilation or systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction) that require different clinical treatments. Echocardiography findings can imply a treatment change in up to 33% of these patients. Furthermore, in addition to assessing biventricular function (and the presence or absence of pericardial effusion), echocardiography provides other useful information, such as noninvasive estimation of cardiac output, diastolic function parameters—in particular the E/e’ ratio—and evaluation of right ventricular function and the pulmonary circulation, which is of considerable value in patients with severe hypoxemia requiring mechanical ventilation. Interpreting this set of parameters is helpful for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients regarding aspects such as optimizing positive end-expiratory pressure and progressing to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation.6, 7 Moreover, as there is a known relationship between COVID-19 and thromboembolic phenomena, ultrasound study can be useful to promptly recognize possible thromboembolic complications of the disease. Finally, ultrasound of the lung complements lung function study by enabling detection of pulmonary interstitial edema, subpleural consolidations, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion. In certain cases, it can obviate referrals for computed tomography examination, with a consequent decrease in the risk of contagion. In conclusion, in situations of elevated disease transmission, we should consider the balance between the risk of contagion and the expected clinical benefit of complementary examinations. Myocardial injury is common in critically ill patients with COVID-19, and echocardiography is important for diagnosing and treating these patients.
  8 in total

1.  Safe performance of echocardiography during the COVID-19 pandemic: a practical guide.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Maria Concetta Pastore; Michael Henein; Hatem Soliman Aboumarie; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Paolo Cameli; Federico Franchi; Sergio Mondillo; Serafina Valente
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.930

2.  Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Shaobo Shi; Mu Qin; Bo Shen; Yuli Cai; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Wei Gong; Xu Liu; Jinjun Liang; Qinyan Zhao; He Huang; Bo Yang; Congxin Huang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Anda Bularga; Rebecca T Hahn; Rong Bing; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Audrey White; Giovanni Di Salvo; Leyla Elif Sade; Keith Pearce; David E Newby; Bogdan A Popescu; Erwan Donal; Bernard Cosyns; Thor Edvardsen; Nicholas L Mills; Kristina Haugaa
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Echocardiography in Pandemic: Front-Line Perspective, Expanding Role of Ultrasound, and Ethics of Resource Allocation.

Authors:  Daniel H Drake; Michele De Bonis; Michele Covella; Eustachio Agricola; Alberto Zangrillo; Karen G Zimmerman; Frederick C Cobey
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  [Ultrasound in the management of the critically ill patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19): narrative review].

Authors:  V Fraile Gutiérrez; J M Ayuela Azcárate; D Pérez-Torres; L Zapata; A Rodríguez Yakushev; A Ochagavía
Journal:  Med Intensiva (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 6.  Bedside Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in COVID-19 from the Wuhan Epicenter: The Role of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Limited Transthoracic Echocardiography, and Critical Care Echocardiography.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Bin Wang; Jianhua Zhou; James Kirkpatrick; Mingxing Xie; Amer M Johri
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Spectrum of Cardiac Manifestations in COVID-19: A Systematic Echocardiographic Study.

Authors:  Yishay Szekely; Yael Lichter; Philippe Taieb; Ariel Banai; Aviram Hochstadt; Ilan Merdler; Amir Gal Oz; Ehud Rothschild; Guy Baruch; Yogev Peri; Yaron Arbel; Yan Topilsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence from front-line clinical observation in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qing Deng; Bo Hu; Yao Zhang; Hao Wang; Xiaoyang Zhou; Wei Hu; Yuting Cheng; Jie Yan; Haiqin Ping; Qing Zhou
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.164

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.