Pablo Jorge-Pérez1, Albert Durán-Cambra2. 1. Unidad de Cuidados Agudos Cardiológicos, Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. Electronic address: pablorge@gmail.com. 2. Unidad de Cuidados Agudos Cardiológicos, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
To the Editor,After attentively reading the article by Rodríguez-Santamarta et al., we would like to provide some considerations regarding echocardiography for critically ill patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19).In the analysis of their patient series, the authors found no association between systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%) and a poor prognosis. These results led them to propose limiting echocardiography studies to patients with congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, electrocardiographic changes, or cardiomegaly.First, we wish to congratulate the group for an interesting and important study carried out in these difficult times of the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation has created a new scenario requiring constant efforts of adaptation, and studies such as this enable advances in the knowledge and treatment of this disease.In our opinion, the results provided should be analyzed with caution, as the study contains a small, single-center sample and the results contrast with those reported in previous articles on COVID-19 patients in intensive care units. In these studies, elevated biomarkers of myocardial injury and stress, such as cardiac troponin and the amino-terminal fraction of pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with a worse prognosis.2, 3Of note, cardiac involvement in these patients is not limited to changes in left ventricular systolic function, the variable analyzed in association with the prognosis in the study. It seems that right ventricular dilation and dysfunction are even more common, likely resulting from increased pulmonary vascular resistance due to alveolar hypoxia and possible thromboembolic phenomena.Echocardiography, and more recently lung ultrasound, are first-line tests in the assessment of critically ill patients because of their wide availability and high diagnostic yield. We agree that it is important to balance the indication and benefits of conducting these studies when there is a potential risk of disease transmission, and in this regard, critically ill patient deserves special consideration.There is a non-negligible prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and myocardial injury in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19, as many have various underlying heart conditions (right ventricular systolic dysfunction and dilation or systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction) that require different clinical treatments. Echocardiography findings can imply a treatment change in up to 33% of these patients.Furthermore, in addition to assessing biventricular function (and the presence or absence of pericardial effusion), echocardiography provides other useful information, such as noninvasive estimation of cardiac output, diastolic function parameters—in particular the E/e’ ratio—and evaluation of right ventricular function and the pulmonary circulation, which is of considerable value in patients with severe hypoxemia requiring mechanical ventilation. Interpreting this set of parameters is helpful for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients regarding aspects such as optimizing positive end-expiratory pressure and progressing to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation.6, 7Moreover, as there is a known relationship between COVID-19 and thromboembolic phenomena, ultrasound study can be useful to promptly recognize possible thromboembolic complications of the disease.Finally, ultrasound of the lung complements lung function study by enabling detection of pulmonary interstitial edema, subpleural consolidations, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion. In certain cases, it can obviate referrals for computed tomography examination, with a consequent decrease in the risk of contagion.In conclusion, in situations of elevated disease transmission, we should consider the balance between the risk of contagion and the expected clinical benefit of complementary examinations. Myocardial injury is common in critically ill patients with COVID-19, and echocardiography is important for diagnosing and treating these patients.
Authors: Marc R Dweck; Anda Bularga; Rebecca T Hahn; Rong Bing; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Audrey White; Giovanni Di Salvo; Leyla Elif Sade; Keith Pearce; David E Newby; Bogdan A Popescu; Erwan Donal; Bernard Cosyns; Thor Edvardsen; Nicholas L Mills; Kristina Haugaa Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Daniel H Drake; Michele De Bonis; Michele Covella; Eustachio Agricola; Alberto Zangrillo; Karen G Zimmerman; Frederick C Cobey Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: V Fraile Gutiérrez; J M Ayuela Azcárate; D Pérez-Torres; L Zapata; A Rodríguez Yakushev; A Ochagavía Journal: Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) Date: 2020-05-04
Authors: Li Zhang; Bin Wang; Jianhua Zhou; James Kirkpatrick; Mingxing Xie; Amer M Johri Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.251