Literature DB >> 33272626

Identification of a unique epigenetic profile in women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Kristina W Olsen1, Juan Castillo-Fernandez2, Andrew Cho Chan3, Nina la Cour Freiesleben4, Anne Zedeler5, Mona Bungum6, Alexia Cardona7, John R B Perry8, Sven O Skouby9, Eva R Hoffmann3, Gavin Kelsey10, Marie Louise Grøndahl9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether epigenetic profiles of mural granulosa cells (MGC) and leukocytes from women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) differ from those of women with normal or high ovarian reserve.
DESIGN: Prospectively collected material from a multicenter cohort of women undergoing fertility treatment.
SETTING: Private and university-based facilities for clinical services and research. PATIENT(S): One hundred and nineteen women of various ages and ovarian reserve status (antimüllerian hormone level) who provided blood samples and MGC. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Measures of epigenetic aging rates from whole-genome methylation array data: DNA methylation variability, age acceleration, DNA methylation telomere length estimator (DNAmTL), and accumulation of epimutations. RESULT(S): Comparison of DOR or high ovarian reserve samples to controls (normal ovarian reserve) showed differential methylation variability between DOR and normal samples at 4,199 CpGs in MGC, and 447 between high and normal (false-discovery rate < 0.05). Variable sites in MGC from DOR were enriched in regions marked with the repressive histone modification H3K27me3, and also included genes involved in folliculogenesis, such as insulin growth factor 2 (IGF2) and antimüllerian hormone (AMH). Regardless of ovarian reserve, very few signals were detected in leukocytes, and no overlaps with those in MGC were found. Furthermore, we found a higher number of epimutations in MGC from women with DOR (Kruskal-Wallis test, difference in mean = 3,485). CONCLUSION(S): The somatic cells of human ovarian follicles have a distinctive epigenetic profile in women with DOR. A high frequency of epimutations suggests premature aging. Ovarian reserve status was not reflected in the leukocyte epigenetic profile.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; epigenetics; granulosa cells; ovarian reserve; reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33272626     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Idiopathic early ovarian aging: is there a relation with premenopausal accelerated biological aging in young women with diminished response to ART?

Authors:  Mette W Christensen; David L Keefe; Fang Wang; Christine S Hansen; Isaac J Chamani; Carolyn Sommer; Mette Nyegaard; Palle D Rohde; Anders L Nielsen; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Ulrik S Kesmodel; Ulla B Knudsen; Kirstine Kirkegaard; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Peripheral mitochondrial DNA, telomere length and DNA methylation as predictors of live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Letizia Li Piani; Marco Reschini; Edgardo Somigliana; Stefania Ferrari; Andrea Busnelli; Paola Viganò; Chiara Favero; Benedetta Albetti; Mirjam Hoxha; Valentina Bollati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Biomaterials and advanced technologies for the evaluation and treatment of ovarian aging.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Yican Guo; Simin Wei; Liru Xue; Weicheng Tang; Dan Chen; Jiaqiang Xiong; Yibao Huang; Fangfang Fu; Chuqing Wu; Ying Chen; Su Zhou; Jinjin Zhang; Yan Li; Wenwen Wang; Jun Dai; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 9.429

4.  Associations between epigenetic age acceleration and infertility.

Authors:  Yunsung Lee; Jon Bohlin; Christian M Page; Haakon E Nustad; Jennifer R Harris; Per Magnus; Astanand Jugessur; Maria C Magnus; Siri E Håberg; Hans I Hanevik
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.353

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.