| Literature DB >> 33271907 |
Katarzyna Szurkowska1, Łukasz Szeleszczuk2, Joanna Kolmas1.
Abstract
Powders of α-TCP containing various amounts of silicon were synthesized by two different methods: Wet chemical precipitation and solid-state synthesis. The obtained powders were then physico-chemically studied using different methods: Scanning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM and SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD), infrared and Raman spectroscopies (FT-IR and R), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR). The study showed that the method of synthesis affects the morphology of the obtained particles, the homogeneity of crystalline phase and the efficiency of Si substitution. Solid-state synthesis leads to particles with a low tendency to agglomerate compared to the precipitation method. However, the powders obtained by the solid-state method are less homogeneous and contain a significant amount of other crystalline phase, silicocarnotite (up to 7.33%). Moreover, the microcrystals from this method are more disordered. This might be caused by more efficient substitution of silicate ions: The silicon content of the samples obtained by the solid-state method is almost equal to the nominal values.Entities:
Keywords: bioceramics; biomedical applications; calcium phosphates; physico–chemical properties; α-TCP
Year: 2020 PMID: 33271907 PMCID: PMC7729989 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1SEM microphotographs of the samples: 09Si-aTCP (A), 18Si-aTCP (B), 37Si-aTCP (C), 86 09Si-aTCPs (D), 18Si-aTCPs (E), and 37Si-aTCPs (F).
Figure 2Powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD) diffractograms of the x-aTCP (A) and x-aTCPs (B) samples (*—silicocarnotite).
Chemical compositions of the obtained powders (quantitative phase analysis, Si wt% contents) and lattice parameters from PXRD studies.
| Sample | Composition [wt%] | Si Content [wt%] | Lattice Parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si-α-TCP | SC | |||||||
|
| 97.15 | 2.85 | 0.85 (1.05 *) | 12.909 | 27.268 | 15.211 | 125.80 | |
|
| 97.62 | 2.37 | 1.59 (1.91 *) | 12.875 | 27.341 | 15.239 | 125.76 | |
|
| 96.94 | 3.06 | 2.44 (3.74 *) | 12.900 | 27.356 | 15.224 | 125.66 | |
|
| 96.60 | 3.40 | 1.06 (1.07 *) | 12.892 | 27.345 | 15.235 | 125.73 | |
|
| 94.96 | 5.04 | 2.06 (2.11 *) | 12.911 | 27.564 | 15.189 | 125.77 | |
|
| 92.64 | 7.33 | 3.78 (3.78 *) | 12.874 | 27.202 | 15.282 | 125.80 | |
* Nominal wt% of Si in the obtained sample.
Figure 3FTIR (A) and Raman (B) studies.
Main bands and their characteristic wavenumbers in FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy (α-TCP and SC (silicocarnotite)).
| IR (cm−1) | Raman (cm−1) | Normal Modes (Assignments) |
|---|---|---|
| 458 | 448 | symmetric P-O bending υ2 (α-TCP and SC) |
| 491–498 | υ2 SiO44− | |
| 556 | 567 | anti-symmetric P-O bending υ4 (α-TCP and SC) |
| 678 | υ1 SiO44− | |
| 791–793 | silica (SiO2) | |
| 868 | 844 | υ3 SiO44− |
| 935–938 | 969–954 | symmetric P–O stretching, υ1 (α-TCP and SC) |
| 1010–1013 | 1024 | anti-symmetric P–O stretching, υ3 (α-TCP and SC) |
Figure 431P BD NMR spectra of the obtained powders: 09Si-aTCP and 09SiaTCPs (A), 18Si-aTCP and 18Si-aTCPs (B), 37Si-aTCP and 37Si-aTCPs (C).
Designation and nominal composition of Si-αTCP powders.
| Sample | Synthesis Method | Silicon Source | Expected Chemical Formula | Expected Si Content [wt%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| precipitation | silicon acetate | Ca3(P0.95Si0.05O3.975)2 | 0.9 |
|
| Ca3(P0.9Si0.1O3.95)2 | 1.8 | ||
|
| Ca3(P0.8Si0.2O3.9)2 | 3.7 | ||
|
| solid state | fumed silica | Ca3(P0.95Si0.05O3.975)2 | 0.9 |
|
| Ca3(P0.9Si0.1O3.95)2 | 1.8 | ||
|
| Ca3(P0.8Si0.2O3.9)2 | 3.7 |