| Literature DB >> 33271872 |
Roman S Pavelyev1,2, Yulia F Zaripova2, Vladimir V Yarkovoi2, Svetlana S Vinogradova3, Sherzod Razhabov3, Khasan R Khayarov4, Sergei A Nazarychev1, Andrey S Stoporev1,2,5,6, Rais I Mendgaziev5, Anton P Semenov5, Lenar R Valiullin7, Mikhail A Varfolomeev1,2, Malcolm A Kelland8.
Abstract
The design of new dual-function inhibitors simultaneously preventing hydrate formation and corrosion is a relevant issue for the oil and gas industry. The structure-property relationship for a promising class of hybrid inhibitors based on waterborne polyurethanes (WPU) was studied in this work. Variation of diethanolamines differing in the size and branching of N-substituents (methyl, n-butyl, and tert-butyl), as well as the amount of these groups, allowed the structure of polymer molecules to be preset during their synthesis. To assess the hydrate and corrosion inhibition efficiency of developed reagents pressurized rocking cells, electrochemistry and weight-loss techniques were used. A distinct effect of these variables altering the hydrophobicity of obtained compounds on their target properties was revealed. Polymers with increased content of diethanolamine fragments with n- or tert-butyl as N-substituent (WPU-6 and WPU-7, respectively) worked as dual-function inhibitors, showing nearly the same efficiency as commercial ones at low concentration (0.25 wt%), with the branched one (tert-butyl; WPU-7) turning out to be more effective as a corrosion inhibitor. Commercial kinetic hydrate inhibitor Luvicap 55 W and corrosion inhibitor Armohib CI-28 were taken as reference samples. Preliminary study reveals that WPU-6 and WPU-7 polyurethanes as well as Luvicap 55 W are all poorly biodegradable compounds; BODt/CODcr (ratio of Biochemical oxygen demand and Chemical oxygen demand) value is 0.234 and 0.294 for WPU-6 and WPU-7, respectively, compared to 0.251 for commercial kinetic hydrate inhibitor Luvicap 55 W. Since the obtained polyurethanes have a bifunctional effect and operate at low enough concentrations, their employment is expected to reduce both operating costs and environmental impact.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion inhibitor; dual function inhibitor; flow assurance; kinetic hydrate inhibitor; methane-propane hydrate; waterborne polyurethane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33271872 PMCID: PMC7730648 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of waterborne polyurethanes (WPU).
Figure 1(a) Typical result of ramping experiment for a polyurethane solution (0.5 wt% WPU-3); color-filled areas correspond to P,T-conditions outside the thermodynamic stability of gas hydrate, white area matches hydrate stability zone; (b) P,T-curve illustrating the determination of hydrate onset subcooling (ΔT); dashed line—experimental data for the equilibrium conditions of hydrate formation for the gas mixture [40].
The results of ramping experiments by rocking cell technique.
| Sample | Concentration (wt%) | Standard Deviation of | Δ | Standard Deviation of Δ | α ** (%) | Standard Deviation of α (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distilled water | - | 12.4 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 13.9 | 2.8 |
| P(VCap-VP) | 0.25 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 12.3 | 0.7 | 11.2 | 2.7 |
| 0.5 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 13.6 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
| WPU-1 | 0.25 | n/a *** | |||||
| 0.5 | 9.5 | 0.5 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 29.5 | 2.3 | |
| WPU-2 | 0.25 | 8.6 | 0.4 | 8.9 | 0.4 | 16.1 | 10.2 |
| 0.5 | 7.6 | 0.1 | 9.8 | 0.1 | 26.8 | 1.8 | |
| WPU-3 | 0.25 | 7.4 | 0.4 | 10.0 | 0.4 | 15.2 | 11.8 |
| 0.5 | 6.7 | 0.4 | 10.6 | 0.3 | 21.1 | 7.9 | |
| WPU-4 | 0.25 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 11.0 | 0.4 | 6.7 | 3.1 |
| 0.5 | n/a *** | ||||||
| WPU-5 | 0.25 | 7.2 | 0.2 | 10.2 | 0.1 | 19.5 | 10.5 |
| 0.5 | n/a *** | ||||||
| WPU-6 | 0.25 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 11.6 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 2.4 |
| 0.5 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 11.2 | 0.4 | 6.6 | 4.6 | |
| WPU-7 | 0.25 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 11.6 | 0.2 | 6.3 | 1.8 |
| 0.5 | n/a *** | ||||||
* T is a hydrate onset temperature; ** α is relative pressure decrease; *** n/a means not available.
Figure 2The gas consumption in the absence and presence of polyurethanes and P(VCap-VP) at concentrations of 0.25 wt% (a) and 0.5 wt% (b); color-filled areas correspond to P,T-conditions outside the thermodynamic stability of gas hydrate, white area matches hydrate stability zone; red dashed lines are temperature plots; markers are mean values of relative pressure decrease for each sample; vertical color dashed lines show moment when a mean value for each sample becomes more than 0.07%.
Figure 3Mean hydrate onset subcooling ΔT for samples of synthesized polyurethanes at concentrations of 0.25 wt% (a) and 0.5 wt% (b). Error bars are standard deviations of ΔT.
Figure 4Interfacial tension (IFT) results for polyurethanes and P(VCap-VP) solutions.
Figure 5Dependence of the hydrate onset subcooling ΔT on the interfacial tension IFT for the samples at 0.25 wt%.
Figure 6Variation of open circuit potential with time for CS in 2M HCl solution without and with inhibitors (500 ppm); SCE—silver chloride electrode.
Figure 7Tafel slopes for CS in 2M HCl solution without and with inhibitors (500 ppm).
Kinetic parameters for corrosion in the presence of WPU inhibitors at various concentrations.
| Inhibitor Concentration (ppm) | % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 500 | −472.7 | 0.106 | 0.192 | −478.035 | 0.3195 | 9.25 | 7.8 |
| 100 | −462.3 | 0.187 | 0.206 | −518.553 | 0.7718 | 5.52 | - |
| 50 | −463.2 | 0.171 | 0.210 | −512 | 0.8586 | 4.76 | - |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
|
| |||||||
| 1000 | −470.6 | 0.098 | 0.209 | −459.867 | 0.213 | 13.62 | 38.6 |
| 500 | −471.5 | 0.133 | 0.143 | −482.371 | 0.2943 | 10.17 | 15.1 |
| 100 | −469.1 | 0.140 | 0.188 | −497.662 | 0.4293 | 8.12 | - |
| 50 | −477.6 | 0.115 | 0.167 | −490.414 | 0.4333 | 7.2 | - |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
|
| |||||||
| 1000 | −487.1 | 0.101 | 0.259 | −440.457 | 0.1468 | 10.85 | 57.7 |
| 500 | −470.8 | 0.097 | 0.167 | −478.511 | 0.2916 | 18.16 | 15.9 |
| 100 | −454.7 | 0.108 | 0.189 | −476.808 | 0.3738 | 8.004 | - |
| 50 | −457.7 | 0.087 | 0.128 | −488.887 | 0.4590 | 49.16 | - |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
|
| |||||||
| 1000 | −487.1 | 0.088 | 0.177 | −464.927 | 0.0587 | 43.38 | 83.1 |
| 500 | −460.8 | 0.090 | 0.205 | −459.099 | 0.1024 | 11.42 | 70.5 |
| 100 | −462.6 | 0.138 | 0.179 | −497.252 | 0.1473 | 9.52 | 57.5 |
| 50 | −464.2 | 0.090 | 0.154 | −486.421 | 0.1668 | 12.91 | 51.9 |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
|
| |||||||
| 1000 | −493.2 | 0.072 | 0.111 | −491.581 | 0.0374 | 50.9 | 89.2 |
| 500 | −491.6 | 0.075 | 0.114 | −487.208 | 0.0519 | 37.7 | 85.0 |
| 100 | −494.7 | 0.079 | 0.118 | −483.531 | 0.0889 | 23.2 | 74.4 |
| 50 | −497.7 | 0.074 | 0.107 | −492.829 | 0.0539 | 32.2 | 84.5 |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
|
| |||||||
| 1000 | −458.1 | 0.076 | 0.243 | −449.846 | 0.0313 | 80.3 | 91.0 |
| 500 | −483.1 | 0.09 | 0.208 | −478.083 | 0.0138 | 198.5 | 96.0 |
| 100 | −484 | 0.095 | 0.204 | −471.736 | 0.0235 | 119.5 | 93.2 |
| 50 | −491 | 0.091 | 0.10 | −484.843 | 0.0289 | 89.1 | 91.7 |
| 0 | −511.5 | 0.118 | 0.192 | −504.618 | 0.3467 | 9.12 | - |
* precipitates at 1000 ppm.
Inhibition efficiency, corrosion rate, and surface coverage of WPU-7 at different concentrations in 2M HCl.
| Concentration (ppm) | Weight Loss (g) | Corrosion Rate (mm/y) | Surface Coverage ( | Inhibition Efficiency (% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 0.5581 | 9.19 | - | - |
| 50 | 0.0266 | 0.44 | 0.90 | 90.1 |
| 100 | 0.0251 | 0.41 | 0.91 | 90.6 |
| Armohib CI-28 100 ppm | 0.0035 | 0.058 | 0.99 | 98.7 |
Biodegradation of WPU-6, WPU-7, and P(VCap-VP) based on the ratio of biochemical oxygen demand after 5, 15 and 30 days (BODt) and chemical oxygen demand (CODcr).
| Inhibitor | Time (Days) | BODt (mg L−1) | CODcr (mg L−1) | Degradation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P(VCap-VP) | 5 | 105 ± 23 | 690 ± 7 | 15.2 ± 3.5 |
| 15 | 166 ± 22 | 23.7 ± 3.3 | ||
| 30 | 173 ± 21 | 25.1 ± 3.3 | ||
| WPU-6 | 5 | 68 ± 23 | 700 ± 6 | 9.6 ± 3.4 |
| 15 | 138 ± 22 | 19.7 ± 3.3 | ||
| 30 | 164± 20 | 23.4 ± 3.1 | ||
| WPU-7 | 5 | 109 ± 22 | 678 ± 7 | 16.1 ± 3.4 |
| 15 | 182 ± 21 | 26.8 ± 3.3 | ||
| 30 | 199 ± 20 | 29.4 ± 3.3 |
Figure 8Biodegradation trends for WPU-6, WPU-7, and P(VCap-VP).