Literature DB >> 33270425

Mass-Based, Field-Scale Demonstration of PFAS Retention within AFFF-Associated Source Areas.

David T Adamson1, Anastasia Nickerson2, Poonam R Kulkarni1, Christopher P Higgins2, Jovan Popovic3, Jennifer Field4, Alix Rodowa4, Charles Newell1, Phil DeBlanc1, John J Kornuc3.   

Abstract

Transport of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted sites is limited by various processes that can retain PFAS mass within the source area. This study used concentration data obtained via a high-resolution sampling and analytical protocol to estimate the PFAS mass distribution in source and downgradient areas of a former firefighter training area. The total PFAS mass present at the site was approximately 222 kg, with 106 kg as perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) and 116 kg as polyfluorinated precursors. Zwitterionic and cationic PFAS represented 83% of the total precursor mass and were found primarily in the source and up/side-gradient areas (75%), likely due to preferential hydrophobic partitioning, electrostatic interactions, and diffusion into lower-permeability soils. Based on the release history and the high percentage of total PFAS mass represented by precursors (primarily electrochemical fluorination-derived compounds), the estimated conversion rate of precursors to PFAAs was less than 2% annually. Eighty-two percent of the total PFAS mass was encountered in lower-permeability soils, which limited the potential for advection and transformation. This contributed to a 99% decrease in the mass discharge rate at the far-downgradient plume (0.048 kg/yr compared to the near-source area (3.6 kg/yr)). The results provide field-scale evidence of the importance of these PFAS retention processes at sites where AFFF has been released.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33270425     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

Review 1.  PFAS Molecules: A Major Concern for the Human Health and the Environment.

Authors:  Emiliano Panieri; Katarina Baralic; Danijela Djukic-Cosic; Aleksandra Buha Djordjevic; Luciano Saso
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  Uncovering PFAS and Other Xenobiotics in the Dark Metabolome Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Mass Defect Analysis, and Machine Learning.

Authors:  MaKayla Foster; Markace Rainey; Chandler Watson; James N Dodds; Kaylie I Kirkwood; Facundo M Fernández; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  A Tunable Porous β-Cyclodextrin Polymer Platform to Understand and Improve Anionic PFAS Removal.

Authors:  Ri Wang; Zhi-Wei Lin; Max J Klemes; Mohamed Ateia; Brittany Trang; Jieyuan Wang; Casey Ching; Damian E Helbling; William R Dichtel
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 18.728

4.  Impact of a Hydrocarbon Surfactant on the Retention and Transport of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Saturated and Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Yifan Ji; Ni Yan; Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Xilai Zheng; Mengfan Dai; Hejie Liu; Xin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 5.  Environmental Sources, Chemistry, Fate, and Transport of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: State of the Science, Key Knowledge Gaps, and Recommendations Presented at the August 2019 SETAC Focus Topic Meeting.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; Stephen Korzeniowski; Marc A Mills; Janet Anderson; Richard H Anderson; Jennifer A Arblaster; Jason M Conder; Ian T Cousins; Kavitha Dasu; Barbara J Henry; Linda S Lee; Jinxia Liu; Erica R McKenzie; Janice Willey
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.