| Literature DB >> 33270381 |
Alicia T Widge1, Nadine G Rouphael2, Lisa A Jackson3, Evan J Anderson2, Paul C Roberts4, Mamodikoe Makhene4, James D Chappell5, Mark R Denison5, Laura J Stevens5, Andrea J Pruijssers5, Adrian B McDermott4, Britta Flach4, Bob C Lin4, Nicole A Doria-Rose4, Sijy O'Dell4, Stephen D Schmidt4, Kathleen M Neuzil6, Hamilton Bennett7, Brett Leav7, Mat Makowski8, Jim Albert8, Kaitlyn Cross8, Venkata-Viswanadh Edara2, Katharine Floyd2, Mehul S Suthar2, Wendy Buchanan4, Catherine J Luke4, Julie E Ledgerwood4, John R Mascola4, Barney S Graham4, John H Beigel4.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33270381 PMCID: PMC7727324 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2032195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: N Engl J Med ISSN: 0028-4793 Impact factor: 91.245
Figure 1Time Course of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Binding and Neutralization Responses after mRNA-1273 Vaccination.
Shown are data from 34 participants who were stratified according to age: 18 to 55 years of age (15 participants), 56 to 70 years of age (9 participants), and 71 years of age or older (10 participants). All the participants received 100 μg of mRNA-1273 on days 1 and 29, indicated by arrows. The titers shown are the binding to spike receptor–binding domain (RBD) protein (the end-point dilution titer) assessed on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on days 1, 15, 29, 36, 43, 57, and 119 (Panel A); the 50% inhibitory dilution (ID50) titer on pseudovirus neutralization assay on days 1, 15, 29, 36, 43, 57, and 119 (Panel B); the ID50 titer on focus reduction neutralization test mNeonGreen (FRNT-mNG) assay on days 1, 29, 43, and 119 (Panel C); and the 80% inhibitory dilution (ID80) titer on plaque-reduction neutralization testing (PRNT) assay on days 1, 43, and 119 (Panel D). Data for days 43 and 57 are missing for 1 participant in the 18-to-55-year stratum for whom samples were not obtained at those time points. Each line represents a single participant over time.