Literature DB >> 3326979

Cancer and leukemia risks after low level radiation--controversy, facts and future.

B Modan1.   

Abstract

Quantification of delayed low dose radiation (LDR) effects is still controversial. The current concept of the shape of the dose-response curve, particularly at the very low levels, is derived primarily by extrapolation from high doses and is affected by economic, social and political implications of cancer yield. Evidence based on epidemiological studies of populations exposed to fallout, occupational, intrauterine or background LDR is limited, due to methodological drawbacks and the need for extremely large sample sizes. Nevertheless, recent data indicate that LDR-induced childhood leukemia and thyroid cancer may exceed the rates predicted on the basis of the linear quadratic curve. The high yield in utero and in early childhood could be associated with low cumulative load of background radiation, and a consequently more effective radiation increment. A long term follow up of children exposed to 90 mSv after scalp X-irradiation revealed a relative risk of 3.8 and an excess risk of about 1.08 per 1000 man-sievert per year for thyroid cancer. Application of these findings to the post-Chernobyl state of events suggests that an increment of up to 20% in thyroid cancer might occur in a population exposed to 5 mSv as an aftermath of a similar accident. Prediction of future risk estimates should therefore be made with alertness and an open mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3326979     DOI: 10.1007/bf02934511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother        ISSN: 0736-0118


  83 in total

1.  The relationship of intra-uterine radiation to subsequent mortality and development of leukemia in children. A prospective study.

Authors:  E L Diamond; H Schmerler; A M Lilienfeld
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Cancer following nuclear weapons tests.

Authors:  E G Knox; T Sorahan; A Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Cancer following nuclear weapons tests.

Authors:  E G Knox; T Sorahan; A M Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Implications of new Hiroshima and Nagasaki dose estimates: cancer risks and neutron RBE.

Authors:  T Straume; R L Dobson
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Army technologists: 29-year follow up for cause of death.

Authors:  S Jablon; R W Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A parallel analysis of cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors and patients with ankylosing spondylitis given X-ray therapy.

Authors:  S C Darby; E Nakashima; H Kato
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mortality and cancer frequency among military nuclear test (Smoky) participants, 1957 through 1979.

Authors:  G G Caldwell; D Kelley; M Zack; H Falk; C W Heath
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Preconception radiation, intrauterine diagnostic radiation, and childhood neoplasia.

Authors:  P H Shiono; C S Chung; N C Myrianthopoulos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Mortality from leukaemia and cancer in shipyard nuclear workers.

Authors:  T Najarian; T Colton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The estimation of low-dose hazards by extrapolation from high doses.

Authors:  H H Rossi
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct
View more
  1 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic correlates of neurological disturbances at remote periods of the effect of ionizing radiation (sequelae of the Chernobyl' NPP accident).

Authors:  L A Zhavoronkova; N B Kholodova; G A Zubovskii; N I Ryzhov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.