| Literature DB >> 33269597 |
Haoran Zhang1,2, Xingming Zhang1,2, Xudong Zhu1,2, Yuchao Ni1,2, Jindong Dai1,2, Sha Zhu1,2, Guangxi Sun1,2, Zhipeng Wang1,2, Junru Chen1,2, Jinge Zhao1,2, Hao Zeng1,2, Zi Li3, Pengfei Shen1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It remained unclear whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) related renal impairment had impact on the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Entities:
Keywords: metastatic renal cell carcinoma; renal impairment; survival outcome; tumor response; tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33269597 PMCID: PMC8480366 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820977143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Control ISSN: 1073-2748 Impact factor: 3.302
Clinicopathological Parameters of Included Patients (N = 110).
| N (%) or n (±SD) | N (%) or n (±SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| MSKCC, n (%) | ||
| <65 | 81 (73.6) | Favorable | 17 (15.5) |
| ≥65 | 29 (26.4) | Intermediate | 74 (67.3) |
|
| Poor | 19 (17.2) | |
| Male | 77 (70) | Treatment duration, (m) | 26.2 (±24.0) |
| Female | 33 (30) | 1st-line TKIs drugs, n (%) | |
|
| Sunitinib | 65 (59.1) | |
| <24 | 73 (66.4) | Axitinib | 45 (40.9) |
| ≥24 | 37 (33.6) | Treatment cessation, n (%) | 9 (8.2%) |
|
| Primary Hypertension | 37 (33.6) | |
| ccRCC | 81 (73.6) | TKI-induced hypertension, n (%) | 32 (29.1) |
| Non-ccRCC | 29 (26.4) | Baseline | |
|
| BUN (mmol/L) | 6.2 (±3.0) | |
| <3 | 28 (25.5) | BUN >7.1 mmol/L, n (%) | 25 (22.7) |
| ≥3 | 82 (74.5) | eGFR (ml/(min/1.73m[ | 75.1 (±22.3) |
|
| eGFR (ml/(min/1.73m[ | ||
| <3 | 60 (54.5) | >60 | 83 (75.5) |
| ≥3 | 50 (45.5) | 30-60 | 24 (22.8) |
|
| <30 | 3 (2.7) | |
| 0 | 89 (80.9) | Proteinuria (g/L), n (%) | |
| 1 | 21 (19.1) | <0.3 | 80 (72.7) |
| ECOG, n (%) | 0.3-3.0 | 24 (21.8) | |
| 0-1 | 87 (79.1) | >3.0 | 6 (5.5) |
| ≥2 | 23 (20.9) | Post-treatment | |
|
| 52 (47.3) | BUN >7.1 mmol/L, n (%) | 46 (41.8) |
| | BUN increase > 10% | 61 (55.5) | |
| Lung | 65 (59.1) | eGFR (ml/(min/1.73m[ | |
| Bone | 30 (27.3) | >60 | 55 (50.0) |
| Liver | 11 (10.0) | 30-60 | 37 (33.6) |
| Brain | 3 (2.7) | <30 | 18 (16.4) |
| Lymph node | 15 (13.6) | eGFR decrease >10%, n (%) | 63 (57.3) |
| Others | 44 (40.0) | Proteinuria (g/L), n (%) | |
| Metastatic sites≥2 | 50 (45.5) | <0.3 | 46 (41.8) |
|
| 0.3-3.0 | 36 (32.7) | |
| Favorable | 17 (15.5) | >3.0 | 28 (25.5) |
| Intermediate | 66 (60.0) | Elevation of proteinuria, n (%) | 45 (40.9) |
| Poor | 27 (24.5) |
BMI: body mass index; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; non-RCC: including papillary, chromophobe and other types of RCC; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMDC: International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; MSKCC: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; AEs: adverse event; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; BUN, blood, urea nitrogen; eGFR estimated glomerular filtrating rate.
Figure 1.Dynamic change of renal function related parameters after TKIs treatment (n = 110). Tendency of renal function change after TKIs treatment: A-C stands for the dynamic change of BUN, eGFR, and proteinuria in the whole cohort; D-F stands for the dynamic change of BUN, eGFR, and proteinuria in patients without RI at baseline; G-I stands for the dynamic change of BUN, eGFR and proteinuria in patients with RI at baseline.
Figure 2.Correlations between post-treatment renal function related parameters and PFS of mRCC treated with TKIs (n = 110). Kaplan-Meier curves of different renal function related parameters in patients with normal renal function related parameters at baseline: (A) Relationship of post-treatment eGFR level and PFS; (B) Relationship of post-treatment proteinuria level and PFS; (C) relationship of elevated proteinuria level after TKIs treatment and PFS.
Multivariate Analysis of PFS and OS in mRCC Patients (n = 110).
| PFS | OS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |||
|
| ||||||
| <55 vs ≥55 | 2.975 (1.164-7.607) | 0.023* | 1.880 (0.970-7.014) | 0.062 | ||
|
| ||||||
| 0-1 vs ≥2 | 5.281 (2.665-10.465) | <0.001* | 3.998 (2.018-7.921) | <0.001* | ||
|
| ||||||
| Favorable | Ref. | 0.316 | Ref. | 0.011* | ||
| Intermediate | 0.834 (0.384-1.815) | 0.648 | 0.809 (0.331-1.978) | 0.809 | ||
| Poor | 0.518 (0.206-1.303) | 0.162 | 2.185 (0.873-5.470) | 0.095 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.022 (0.446-2.341) | 0.958 | – | – | – | |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m[ | ||||||
| <30 | – | – | – | Ref. | 0.831 | |
| 30-60 | – | – | – | 0.973 (0.111-8.499) | 0.980 | |
| >60 | – | – | – | 1.285 (0.156-10.595) | 0.816 | |
|
| ||||||
| <0.3 | Ref. | 0.062 | Ref. | 0.016* | ||
| 0.3-3.0 | 2.339 (1.099-4.977) | 0.027 | 2.062 (0.953-4.463) | 0.066 | ||
| >3.0 | 2.302 (0.697-7.602) | 0.171 | 6.298 (1.571-25.244) | 0.009 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.144 (0.572-2.287) | 0.705 | 1.205 (0.600-2.417) | 0.605 | ||
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m[ | ||||||
| <30 | Ref. | 0.048* | Ref. | 0.009* | ||
| 30-60 | 1.652 (0.716-3.814) | 0.240 | 0.082 (0.325-1.980) | 0.632 | ||
| >60 | 3.022 (1.216-7.508) | 0.017 | 2.749 (1.028-7.349) | 0.044 | ||
|
| ||||||
| <0.3 | Ref. | 0.039* | Ref. | <0.001* | ||
| 0.3-3.0 | 0.512 (0.246-1.068) | 0.074 | 0.370 (0.185-0.739) | 0.005 | ||
| >3.0 | 0.384 (0.176-0.836) | 0.016 | 0.174 (0.068-0.451) | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.121 (0.652-1.926) | 0.680 | – | – | – | |
|
| ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.682 (0.401-1.161) | 0.159 | 0.536 (0.301-0.954) | 0.034* | ||
|
| ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.529 (0.306-0.913) | 0.022* | 0.241 (0.124-0.468) | <0.001* | ||
ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMDC: International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; BUN, blood, urea nitrogen; eGFR estimated glomerular filtrating rate.
* p < 0.05.
Multivariate Analysis of PFS and OS in mRCC Patients Without Renal Impairment at Initial Diagnosis.
| PFS | OS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | |||
| Age | ||||||
| <55 vs ≥55 | 1.334 (0.571-3.121) | 0.506 | 1.330 (0.575-3.077) | 0.505 | ||
| ECOG | ||||||
| 0-1 vs ≥2 | 3.154 (0.957-10.392) | 0.059 | 1.551 (0.585-4.111) | 0.378 | ||
| IMDC | ||||||
| Favorable | Ref. | 0.620 | Ref. | 0.026* | ||
| Intermediate | 1.616 (0.488-5.349) | 0.432 | 0.755 (0.268-2.133) | 0.596 | ||
| Poor | 1.084 (0.223-5.279) | 0.921 | 2.240 (0.759-6.610) | 0.144 | ||
| After TKIs treatment | ||||||
| BUN >7.1 mmol/L | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.443 (0.619-3.364) | 0.396 | 1.219 (0.482-3.080) | 0.675 | ||
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m[ | ||||||
| <30 | Ref. | 0.086 | Ref. | 0.004* | ||
| 30-60 | 1.365 (0.322-5.775) | 0.673 | 3.379 (0.630-18.136) | 0.156 | ||
| >60 | 3.172 (0.960-10.482) | 0.058 | 19.392 (3.201-117.470) | 0.001 | ||
| Proteinuria (g/dl) | ||||||
| <0.3 | Ref. | 0.232 | Ref. | 0.014* | ||
| 0.3-3.0 | 1.032 (0.383-2.784) | 0.950 | 0.729 (0.313-1.699) | 0.464 | ||
| >3.0 | 0.388 (0.128-1.181) | 0.096 | 0.028 (0.002-0.318) | 0.004 | ||
| Dynamic change of renal function | ||||||
| BUN increase >10% | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.493 (0.561-3.975) | 0.432 | 0.505 (0.194-1.318) | 0.163 | ||
| eGFR decrease >10% | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.419 (0.156-1.129) | 0.085 | 0.243 (0.080-0.734) | 0.012* | ||
| Elevated proteinuria | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.311 (0.114-0.849) | 0.023* | 0.278 (0.111-0.699) | 0.006* | ||
ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMDC: International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; BUN, blood, urea nitrogen; eGFR estimated glomerular filtrating rate.
* p < 0.05.
Figure 3.Correlations between post-treatment renal function related parameters and OS of mRCC treated with TKIs (n = 110). Kaplan-Meier curves of different renal function related parameters in patients with normal renal function related parameters at baseline: (A) Relationship of post-treatment eGFR level and OS; (B) Relationship of eGFR decreased >10% after TKIs treatment and OS; (C) Relationship of post-treatment proteinuria level and OS; (D) Relationship of elevated roteinuria level after TKIs treatment and OS.
Figure 4.Correlations between post-treatment renal impairment and survival outcomes of mRCC patients in different IMDC risk groups (n = 110). Kaplan-Meier curves of renal impairment in patients with different IMDC risk groups: (A) Relationship of post-treatment eGFR level and OS in IMDC intermediate-risk group; (B) Relationship of eGFR decreased >10% after TKIs treatment and OS in IMDC intermediate-risk group; (C) Relationship of elevated proteinuria level after TKIs treatment and OS in IMDC poor-risk group.
Figure 5.Correlations between post-treatment eGFR level within 1 year and PFS and OS of mRCC treated with TKIs (n = 110). Kaplan-Meier curves of eGFR level within 1 year: (A) Relationship of post-treatment eGFR level within 1 year and PFS; (B) Relationship of post-treatment eGFR level within 1 year and OS.
Multivariate Analysis of the Dynamic Change of Renal Function Within 1 Year and PFS and OS in mRCC Patients (n = 110).
| PFS | OS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | |||
| BUN increase >10% | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 1.337 (0.764-2.342) | 0.310 | 1.435 (0.790-2.608) | 0.235 | ||
| eGFR decrease >10% | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.498 (0.270-0.920) | 0.026* | 0.474 (0.259-0.869) | 0.016* | ||
| Elevated proteinuria | ||||||
| No vs Yes | 0.866 (0.544-1.378) | 0.543 | 1.151 (0.650-2.040) | 0.630 | ||
BUN, blood, urea nitrogen; eGFR estimated glomerular filtrating rate.
* p < 0.05.